Gearing to 167 mph?

Gearing to 167 mph?

Author
Discussion

donatien

Original Poster:

1,113 posts

265 months

Saturday 8th March 2003
quotequote all
Not wishing anyone to incriminate themselves on here but if the Griff 500 does 167 as stated isn't that way past peak power?

Is it deliberately low geared to get the sheer oomph? I've never got close to that cos I think it gets very woolly at 150+ (on a track orf course)

bennno

12,756 posts

276 months

Saturday 8th March 2003
quotequote all

I hit that on the speedo in mine in Italy.

In reality it was probably more like 150 with the speedo inaccuracy.

Bennno

>> Edited by bennno on Saturday 8th March 22:14

donatien

Original Poster:

1,113 posts

265 months

Saturday 8th March 2003
quotequote all
So what RPM Benno? I reckon we have around 83-84 @ 3,000. That makes exactly 167 @ 6,000 which is a little high. I thought 5,500 is about as high as you want to go with the Rover V8

Which leads me on - if the Griff was higher geared would it pull 180 or so? I realise it's not the most aerodynamic car and you'd need to be a bit mad to try it but it just might be capable of more.


julianhj

8,792 posts

269 months

Sunday 9th March 2003
quotequote all
At Duxford last year I could only comfortably reach 145mph (indicated) before feeling the need to hit the brakes for the end of the straight. It was roof-off, and rate of acceleration dropped off noticably after around 130 mph. Is this common? I'm looking forward to Bruntingthorpe in May, as I'd like to see just how fast she'll go - I am concerned about high speed handling though, anyone got much experience of this?

gerjo

1,627 posts

289 months

Sunday 9th March 2003
quotequote all
Don't have a lot of experience but my 500 pulls quite strongly up till around 150 mph (probably 140 mph in reality). Haven't tried top speed, but once hit 160 mph (on the speedo) with the roof off. Handling is fine but then I have uprated dampers which is supposed to make the difference.

shpub

8,507 posts

279 months

Sunday 9th March 2003
quotequote all

donatien said: So what RPM Benno? I reckon we have around 83-84 @ 3,000. That makes exactly 167 @ 6,000 which is a little high. I thought 5,500 is about as high as you want to go with the Rover V8



Depends on the Rover V8. the 500s have a 6000 red line.

donatien

Original Poster:

1,113 posts

265 months

Sunday 9th March 2003
quotequote all

shpub said:

donatien said: So what RPM Benno? I reckon we have around 83-84 @ 3,000. That makes exactly 167 @ 6,000 which is a little high. I thought 5,500 is about as high as you want to go with the Rover V8



Depends on the Rover V8. the 500s have a 6000 red line.


Yes but your bible points out peak power @ 5500. In which case the claimed top speed is past this.

Not the first time a car hits the max by going over the power band of course, I was just curious.

kevinday

12,311 posts

287 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
Top speed will arrive when the engine produces the same amount of power as is required to overcome drag, therefore if the gearing is such that the engine still produces enough power after peak power is reached the car will still accelerate until the equation is balanced.

shpub

8,507 posts

279 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
Peak power does not mean or indicate the maximum speed. Providing the engine is producing sufficient power to accelerate the car, it will continue to go faster. If that occurs over the peak power point the car will go faster. With some engines, the power drops off and the car will slow but on others it doesn't.

Steve

anonymous-user

61 months

Monday 10th March 2003
quotequote all
...or until your at the redline.

Has anyone tried a different diff ratio?

Painey

534 posts

263 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
Went to Bruntingthorpe yesterday for one of Don Palmers "Creative Car Control" courses in my Griff 500 and was bloody good fun.

About the top speed question, I'd just about hit 167mph down the straight when Don informed me that the roof might come off so I backed off a bit. It was still accelerating but I must admit that I didn't notice what the rev counter was saying as there were a few birds about on the track and I was a bit worried about one of them ruining the car!!

apache

39,731 posts

291 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
less than the limiter at 6200 then, was it stable at that speed?

RichB

52,782 posts

291 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all

Painey said:I'd just about hit 167mph down the straight... I didn't notice what the rev counter
No wonder you didn't notice the rev counter you must have been concentrating closely at the speedo to make out the exact speed as opposed to just somewhere between 165 & 170 ! Rich...

davidd

6,531 posts

291 months

Tuesday 11th March 2003
quotequote all
I saw over 160 in mine on the way back from lemans one year. I felt better than I thought it would, no idea of the rpm as my passenger was screaming at me to slow down.

Painey

534 posts

263 months

Wednesday 12th March 2003
quotequote all
Yeah the car was quite stable at those speeds even though it was quite windy on Monday. I was aiming to get over 170 and I think that it would have got to it , or rather what was marked on the speedo anyway!

Pulled strongly up to about 150ish but was still gaining speed when I backed off. The straight there at Bruntingthorpe is bloody long so I'd be interested to here what anybody else could get. The other guy on the course took his M3 to an indicated 160 with 3 of us in it and I thought they were supposed to be restricted!!!

jvaughan

6,025 posts

290 months

Monday 24th March 2003
quotequote all

shpub said:

donatien said: So what RPM Benno? I reckon we have around 83-84 @ 3,000. That makes exactly 167 @ 6,000 which is a little high. I thought 5,500 is about as high as you want to go with the Rover V8



Depends on the Rover V8. the 500s have a 6000 red line.


Interesting .... My limiter is set to 6500 on my 4litre .... I cannot get past 150 - 155. without bouncing off the rev limiter. I suspect my problem is gearing. ( see post on wedge forum)

donatien

Original Poster:

1,113 posts

265 months

Monday 24th March 2003
quotequote all
Well my whole point was that if you "nominate" a top speed then is would make sense for that to co-incide with peak power whilst in top. The Griff seems a bit short-geared to me, which of course in some way accounts for its' blistering acceleration. No complaints there of course

I've never had it that far but it seems that 167 would be about 6,000 rpm. 500 rpm over peak power. As Steve Heath has said the car will accelerate if the engine is still delivering enough power to do so.

The question then really is maybe, how high could you raise the gearing? Would a Griff touch 180 with a different final drive?

For comparison how are the Cerberas & Tuscans geared. Assuming you could pull peak power in 5th what would that equate to in road speed?

Dave

Leadfoot

1,905 posts

288 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all
My Griff will definately pull 600rpm in 5th But obviously I needed a long 'test track' It also felt pretty stable at the time.

donatien

Original Poster:

1,113 posts

265 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all

Leadfoot said: My Griff will definately pull 600rpm in 5th But obviously I needed a long 'test track' It also felt pretty stable at the time.


I should hope so too - 600rpm is lower than idle! Probably 17mph.

I'm sure you meant 6000 rpm

Leadfoot

1,905 posts

288 months

Tuesday 25th March 2003
quotequote all