That 94 Griffith

[jhough]

Got a few pictures of it and some more details. It''s RED red, with a dark blue interior. Looks to be in excellent condition. Here''s the big question everyone wants to know: How''d they get it registered in california? The answer is funny. It''s registered as a 1967 Griffith. emissions regulations for cars that old are pretty easy to pass. And what DMV employee would know the difference? Anyway, I assume he''ll put the pics he sent me on his site soon, if you''re interested. Jason TVR and Aston Fanatic Audi TT owner Former Acura NSX owner

[USTVRDUDE]

I talked with the person who originally "did" the conversion (0n paper) to that 94 griff. He lived in the right place and got lucky. Missed out on test driving and owning it. (He was selling it for a LOT less) But I give creative credit here, if you didn't know, wouldn't a 67 Griff 500 follow a 66 Griff 400? Bill

quote:Got a few pictures of it and some more details. It''s RED red, with a dark blue interior. Looks to be in excellent condition. Here''s the big question everyone wants to know: How''d they get it registered in california? The answer is funny. It''s registered as a 1967 Griffith. emissions regulations for cars that old are pretty easy to pass. And what DMV employee would know the difference? Anyway, I assume he''ll put the pics he sent me on his site soon, if you''re interested. Jason TVR and Aston Fanatic Audi TT owner Former Acura NSX owner

[Miko]

Whomever passed this off as a '67, I give major credit to. I don't think I could pull that passed anyone but the most ridiculous idiot.


More pics @ www.wirewheel.com/Cars/Auto_Generated_Pages/997887054.shtml/

[USTVRDUDE]

Hey,
If you lived in the California High Desert and had never even HEARD of
TVR, much less seen one in person, how could you tell what year it was?
New TVRs are supposed to loook kinda retro.....

I'm trying to treat all DMV people nice...you never know what I may
need to have them do? umm, believe?