Temperature sender Part number.

Temperature sender Part number.

Author
Discussion

V8Bart

Original Poster:

788 posts

197 months

Friday 9th April 2021
quotequote all


Please can anyone identify this sender as a general part number rather than tvr one? 40-120 gauge on griffith 500

Been searching without any luck.

MikeE

1,850 posts

291 months

Friday 9th April 2021
quotequote all
£17.94 on Parts fir TVR

V8Bart

Original Poster:

788 posts

197 months

Friday 9th April 2021
quotequote all
Many thanks, I just want to buy without tvr tax at my local part's store couple of miles away. I know it'll be a standard land rover or such part.

scottliv

156 posts

53 months

Saturday 10th April 2021
quotequote all
You might find it is not a rover part but one matched to the dash temperature gauge. You will need the appropriate sender for the make of gauges that you have.

bobfather

11,186 posts

262 months

Saturday 10th April 2021
quotequote all
scottliv said:
You might find it is not a rover part but one matched to the dash temperature gauge. You will need the appropriate sender for the make of gauges that you have.
In fact you will find that it's not a rover part. That sender was retrofitted by TVR to match the gauge, the Rover dash sender is there but unused sitting next to the ECU temperature sender. The best solution is to buy the matched sender that fits where the Rover dash sender is and wire to that. Much more responsive and accurate than the TVR jerry-rigged mess that leaves the sender in a dead space outside of the coolant flow.

Mutley00

278 posts

130 months

Sunday 11th April 2021
quotequote all
A long post I know but worth a skim through, some very knowledgable stuff about the merits of re-locating your sender.

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

Steve_D

13,795 posts

265 months

Sunday 11th April 2021
quotequote all
See this thread
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...

The temp gauge is known to give low readings and be unresponsive at higher temps which is the very thing you do not want.

Leave the existing sender where it is and replace the LR sender up top beside the ECU temp sender with a TT6811.03 from Caerbont.

This lack of accuracy is so common we now have a box in our service sheet showing how accurate/inaccurate the gauge is.

Only downside is Carebont will only sell min quantity of 2 so you may want to see if you can find a friend.

Steve

Englishman

2,237 posts

217 months

Sunday 11th April 2021
quotequote all
Or, if you don't want to buy two, go to Caterham Cars and buy a single TT6811-3 for about £14 IIRC which is what I did for my Griff.

https://caterhamparts.co.uk/senders/17-temperature...

Seems they have gone up a bit though frown

scottliv

156 posts

53 months

Sunday 11th April 2021
quotequote all
I have a ‘92 4.3 but don’t seem to have the LR sensor fitted. I am expecting to see it next to the ECU sensor.


QBee

21,400 posts

151 months

Sunday 11th April 2021
quotequote all
You may well not have Caerbont gauges either Scottliv

This is what you would expect to see with the new sender as described by Steve D, fitted on top of the engine. Once you have fitted it, you just pull the wire off the TVR sender down the front of the engine and connect it up. Dead accurate, as confirmed by my optional extra oil temperature gauge. Easy to fit, even I did it, and my only mechanicking qualification is a Pink Socks in Origami.



That's the nearside front corner of the fuel rail, with the new sender just under it and with the TVR sender wire attached with the bright blue shroud on the connector, right next to the ECU temperature sender.

Edited by QBee on Sunday 11th April 16:02

scottliv

156 posts

53 months

Sunday 11th April 2021
quotequote all
QBee said:
You may well not have Caerbont gauges either Scotliv
No I don’t I have the black ones. Was just curious why I don’t have the alternative one fitted.

QBee

21,400 posts

151 months

Sunday 11th April 2021
quotequote all
scottliv said:
QBee said:
You may well not have Caerbont gauges either Scotliv
No I don’t I have the black ones. Was just curious why I don’t have the alternative one fitted.
No idea. While my Chimera is a 1999 car, my engine is a Range Rover block of unknown vintage. There was a Range Rover sender in the hole where I have inserted the new TT6811-3 sender. I just removed the Range Rover sender. Here's a photo taken with the ECU sender removed to give better access, but the RR one in place..



But if you have the previous gauges, then I doubt the TT6811 sender will help. Steve D has a million times more knowledge than me, having run Southways TVR for decades, and will be along with the right information soon I imagine.

V8Bart

Original Poster:

788 posts

197 months

Sunday 11th April 2021
quotequote all
Cheers guys,

Spotted that lengthy posting over the weekend and can see there has been a lot of discussion. Will sort out one tomorrow for the decent location actually in the water jacket flow as suggested.

V8Bart

Original Poster:

788 posts

197 months

Saturday 17th April 2021
quotequote all


Installed and working thanks for the advice. Not sure what the "normal" should be but sitting at 95 in traffic.

KugaWestie

127 posts

98 months

Friday 12th August 2022
quotequote all
Has anyone fitted the alternative sender in the Range Rover location when using the black bezel white faced instruments and been successful?

KugaWestie

127 posts

98 months

Wednesday 17th August 2022
quotequote all
KugaWestie said:
Has anyone fitted the alternative sender in the Range Rover location when using the black bezel white faced instruments and been successful?
Just to confirm the alternative sender does not work with these instruments.

If anyone wants a sender that is compatible with the Caerbont instruments, I have one spare.