RE: Jaguar XK picks up more awards

RE: Jaguar XK picks up more awards

Wednesday 13th December 2006

Jaguar XK picks up more awards

While Richard Hammond picks up Man of the Year


Jaguar XK in Mumbai
Jaguar XK in Mumbai
The Jaguar XK has been crowned ‘Car of the Year’ and ‘GT of the Year’ at the 2006 Top Gear Awards, the first time Jaguar has received this accolade from the UK’s biggest selling motoring publication. The awards were held in London on Thursday 7 December and were presented by Jeremy Clarkson.

Magazine editor Michael Harvey said: “We feel justified in handing our big one to the fabulous XK, a car everyone now recognises as magnificently beautiful, that reclaims the lost role of the Grand Tourer and, we suspect, might reclaim the art of ride/handling compromise in the portfolio of skills any purveyor of so-called luxury cars must possess.”

US editor Jamie Kitman said: “This is not only the best Jaguar in 40 years, it is a real Jaguar; one knows it in seconds. Jaguar has thoroughly demonstrated with the XK that it is an utterly serious modern engineering entity with a priceless institutional memory of that which made Jaguars great.”

Design director Ian Callum collected the award for ‘Car of the Year’; he said: “It was a tremendous honour to receive this award for the XK and for Jaguar to be recognised for creating such an accomplished vehicle by real enthusiasts such as Top Gear. I feel very proud of everyone at Jaguar responsible for their contribution to the success of this car.”

Jaguar's UK boss Geoff Cousins said: “We are delighted Top Gear have chosen the XK as their ‘GT of the Year’ and ‘Car of the Year’, particularly as the awards represent the views from a panel of judges comprising BBC’s Top Gear TV and the magazine. To be the favourite is testament to just how great this car really is, and our sales figures show that the public think so too.”

Jaguar reckons it's sold over 2,000 XKs in the UK already, and dealers have taken over 800 advance orders for the supercharged XKR. Globally, Jaguar has already sold over 10,000 XKs since its launch and taken over 1,500 advance orders for the XKR.

The XK has already picked up otehr awards this year including ‘Most Exciting Car to be launched in 2006’ by What Car? magazine, ‘Car of the Year’ and ‘Best Coupe’ at the Auto Express New Car Honours 2006, ‘Scottish Car of the Year 2006’ and ‘UK TV People’s Car of the Year 2006’.

Across Europe and the United States it has also been gaining accolades including ‘Austrian Car of the Year’ for the convertible and ‘Most Chic Car of the Year’ by Spain’s biggest selling women’s magazine, Telva. Other awards were in recognition of safety features on the car: the Prince Michael Award for Safety and the World Traffic Safety Symposium’s Traffic Safety Achievement Award in the Automaker category.

Hammond

Meanwhile, Richard Hammond picked up Man of the Year award at the same ceremony.

Author
Discussion

HUGE

Original Poster:

1,138 posts

291 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
seem to remember on TG that Clarkson was "underwhelmed" due to the lack of innovation,and components carried over from the last one....was he outvoted or does nobody listen to him anymore??
The car seems to have been universally praised elsewhere,so is he the one dissenting voice ??

cathalm

606 posts

251 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
What components are carried over? I've had a pretty good poke around on a number of accasions and I can't see anything immediately obvious.

Velocity

18 posts

218 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
There is a couple of small switches but nothing that stands out as everything apart from these switches in the car are new. He did have a point about the ancient aerial mast

Phil Dicky

7,162 posts

270 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
cathalm said:
What components are carried over? I've had a pretty good poke around on a number of accasions and I can't see anything immediately obvious.


I think the only thing carried over is the engine, however re-worked and more BHP, but thats the case for all manufacturers at this level, I think...
Body wise and interior wise nothing is carried over.

turbo tim

20,453 posts

238 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
HUGE said:
seem to remember on TG that Clarkson was "underwhelmed" due to the lack of innovation,and components carried over from the last one....was he outvoted or does nobody listen to him anymore??
The car seems to have been universally praised elsewhere,so is he the one dissenting voice ??

Yes, he did didn't he - was he not aware of the groundbreaking, multi-award winning pedestrian impact system????

Felt a bit sorry for Jaguar in this case as, had they not had to spend the money on this system, they could have afforded a lot more technology for the driver/occupants.

Don't get me wrong, pedestrians safety is important, however the best pedestrian protection is shoutDON'T WALK ON THE BLEEDIN' ROAD IN THE FIRST PLACE - THAT IS WHERE THE CARS ARE!!

thirsty

726 posts

271 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
HUGE said:
seem to remember on TG that Clarkson was "underwhelmed" due to the lack of innovation,and components carried over from the last one....was he outvoted or does nobody listen to him anymore??
The car seems to have been universally praised elsewhere,so is he the one dissenting voice ??


If you listen to Clarkson, you'll never buy anything. He hates a car one week, and loves it the next. He is entertaining, but I have found that he is often wrong when talking about a car's attributes.

I think May and Hammond give a much better opinion of the cars they drive.

As for the XK ?? Damn nice car, although I wish they would change that fish mouth grille. I would consider this car based on everything I have read about it. I have only seen one in the flesh (in Switzerland) and I have to say that pictures don't do it justice.

a8hex

5,830 posts

230 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
HUGE said:
seem to remember on TG that Clarkson was "underwhelmed" due to the lack of innovation,and components carried over from the last one....was he outvoted or does nobody listen to him anymore??
The car seems to have been universally praised elsewhere,so is he the one dissenting voice ??



Most of what dear JC says, I think he just says to be controversial

triple7

4,015 posts

244 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
I want Jag to do really well, looking forward to the XF (infact I very surprised there has not been any sneaky pics, considering the unveiling is not going to be till next autumn!!), but the sales figures aren't massive? Only 1500 orders for the new XKR? Only 10,000 worldwide for a car that has been over 5 years in the waiting. The back log seems to be over for the XK, maybe this time next year so will the one for the XKR, is that when the prices will start their all-too-Jaguar-esque slide?

G

Road_Terrorist

5,591 posts

249 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
I got the impression Clarkson quite liked the XK, although he did mention that the TG producer had ordered one so he was deliberately giving it more a pasting than usual to wind him up hehe, in the group test against the Merc and BMW he rated it well and in his newspaper articles he has been singing it's praises more.

FNG

4,372 posts

231 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
I've seen a preview of Clarkson testing the XKR for the next TG series and he waxes lyrical. Not to say he hasn't got some gripes with it, I didn't see the whole piece, but let's face it he says what occurs to him at the time and that has more to do with delivering the next punchline than being objective or constructive with his comments...

Don't see the fuss over the aeriel BTW - it's a convertible. Sticking a shark fin on the bootlid would look plain odd.

Anyone point me in the direction of a car that does the same thing in an acceptable way?

I favour bonding it into the windscreen as on some porsches, but I'm out of touch with what the current vogue is.

fatboy b

9,570 posts

223 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
FNG said:
I've seen a preview of Clarkson testing the XKR for the next TG series and he waxes lyrical. Not to say he hasn't got some gripes with it, I didn't see the whole piece, but let's face it he says what occurs to him at the time and that has more to do with delivering the next punchline than being objective or constructive with his comments...

Don't see the fuss over the aeriel BTW - it's a convertible. Sticking a shark fin on the bootlid would look plain odd.

Anyone point me in the direction of a car that does the same thing in an acceptable way?

I favour bonding it into the windscreen as on some porsches, but I'm out of touch with what the current vogue is.



I have an A4 Cab. I've not found any trace of an aerial or shark fin yet, but I get an excellent radio reception.

FNG

4,372 posts

231 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
Thanks! I'll be staring at A4 cabs from now on looking for how they do it.

Should've added - Jag management are well aware of the criticism re the aeriel and I expect they won't let it happen twice.

Personally I wouldn't be bothered by it and it wouldn't stop me buying one, but then everything I drive is 10 years old at least so like I say I'm out of touch. My Nissan has a mast aeriel and I'm chuffed that it's electric

groomi

9,323 posts

250 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
I quite like having an old-fashioned ariel mast. At least it isn't another shapeless blob of plastic glued to an otherwise curvacious bodyshell.

triple7

4,015 posts

244 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
Its coz they couldn't get the reception on the aerial from sharks fin or the like with the alu body hence the ole mast.

BTW have you seen the horrendous XM sharks fm attenna on the back on the boot lid for American jags. urrrgh.

G

Washout

13 posts

224 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
Well done to Jaguar I say, its good to see an essentially British car manufacturer getting these accolades and I think shows how a foreign owned, UK based car manufacturing venture should be run

The 10K worldwide sales figure is pretty good considering the price bracket and market sector they are aiming for. Its not supposed to be flooding the roads in vast numbers but something to aspire to.

The "fish mouth grill" is the oval intake shape for pretty much all Jag sports/GT cars since the E-type (XJS excepted) and to do away with it would lose the Jaguar identity and personally I like it, otherwise I would have bought another "brand" (OK I like the Aston Martin grill better on a DB9, but that was the dirty business of finance intruding on my desires ).

The aerial is a minor but poor choice, as Jaguar have had a rear windscreen embedded aerial for quite sometime now (I had one in my 2001 SType and it worked flawlessly). Perhaps it was something to do with commonality of parts between the coupe and the convertible, as the embedded one would work in the former but not the latter and each difference in construction adds cost.

Phil Hopkins

17,111 posts

224 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
fatboy b said:
FNG said:
I've seen a preview of Clarkson testing the XKR for the next TG series and he waxes lyrical. Not to say he hasn't got some gripes with it, I didn't see the whole piece, but let's face it he says what occurs to him at the time and that has more to do with delivering the next punchline than being objective or constructive with his comments...

Don't see the fuss over the aeriel BTW - it's a convertible. Sticking a shark fin on the bootlid would look plain odd.

Anyone point me in the direction of a car that does the same thing in an acceptable way?

I favour bonding it into the windscreen as on some porsches, but I'm out of touch with what the current vogue is.



I have an A4 Cab. I've not found any trace of an aerial or shark fin yet, but I get an excellent radio reception.


It's in the boot lid on the A4 cab. Something Jaguar couldn't achieve given the aluminium construction.

steverod

300 posts

223 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
Phil Hopkins said:
fatboy b said:
FNG said:
I've seen a preview of Clarkson testing the XKR for the next TG series and he waxes lyrical. Not to say he hasn't got some gripes with it, I didn't see the whole piece, but let's face it he says what occurs to him at the time and that has more to do with delivering the next punchline than being objective or constructive with his comments...

Don't see the fuss over the aeriel BTW - it's a convertible. Sticking a shark fin on the bootlid would look plain odd.

Anyone point me in the direction of a car that does the same thing in an acceptable way?

I favour bonding it into the windscreen as on some porsches, but I'm out of touch with what the current vogue is.



I have an A4 Cab. I've not found any trace of an aerial or shark fin yet, but I get an excellent radio reception.


It's in the boot lid on the A4 cab. Something Jaguar couldn't achieve given the aluminium construction.


So what do Chevy do with the composite CORVETTE body or Ally bodied FERRARI or PORSCHE?
They don't go to Halfords for a 1970's Electric Aerial, thats for sure!!

Edited by steverod on Wednesday 13th December 17:58

FNG

4,372 posts

231 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
Thanks - I'd have spent quite some time looking for it wouldn't I?

kryten22uk

2,347 posts

238 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
Phil Hopkins said:
It's in the boot lid on the A4 cab. Something Jaguar couldn't achieve given the aluminium construction.


I dont get this. What is it about an alu body? Does it block/interfere with radio waves?

gep

459 posts

223 months

Wednesday 13th December 2006
quotequote all
so what, its a fricking aerial...

and anyway, why do you need a radio when you've got an engine that sounds that sexy?



Edited by gep on Thursday 14th December 20:05