XJR-6 seems a bit slow - worn out blower?

XJR-6 seems a bit slow - worn out blower?

Author
Discussion

richardxjr

Original Poster:

7,561 posts

217 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Hi there, newbie here so please be gentle!

Tried out an XJR-6 auto which I was expecting tremendous performance from. First supercharger I've tried but this car seems more N/A. Could only hear a faint whine and a nice kick 5000rpm+, doesn't seem to do anything below that. In fact, in the higher gears it feels like a wall at 4000 rpm.

Not what I was expecting at all. High mileage though, so is the blower worn out? anything else I could easily check?

Apart from that, fantastic car!

(btw for comparison I run a 270bhp Fiat Coupe 20VT which is similar power-to-weight)
(this XJR feels like similar performance to a previously-owned v8 740i there must be something wrong with the supercharger??)

Hope you guys can help!
Many thanks.
Richard

triple7

4,015 posts

244 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Superchargers don't wear out as far as I am aware. If its done high miles you may need a compression check and a blow by check to see if the poor ole gal is worn out or not?

G

richardxjr

Original Poster:

7,561 posts

217 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Weird that, plenty people out there offering rebuilds, why would this be necessary if they don't wear?

I'd do a comp test anyway, but the engine itself feels strong enough - just feels like no 'boost' until 5k.

I'm used to turbo engines, I thought blowers did their stuff from like 1000 rpm up?

groomi

9,323 posts

250 months

Thursday 19th October 2006
quotequote all
Superchargers are constant, there is no 'step' in power at any point as they are directly driven from the engine. If you can feel a step then there is a problem somewhere and it certainly isn't working properly. Could it be the gearbox perhaps or is it definately at particular revs?

P700DEE

1,138 posts

237 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
Superchargers do not wear out like Turbos but they do have bearings. When the bearings go you can buy a new supercharger or get one of those companies to replace the bearings for much less
Your performance description sounds wrong, get the engine checked out by an expert hopefully it might just be dirty plugs or AFM not like the Top Gear "Supercar" for under £10K where all the horses had bolted

triple7

4,015 posts

244 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
richardxjr said:
Weird that, plenty people out there offering rebuilds, why would this be necessary if they don't wear?


As P700 has said they either work or the bearings are shot and the make one hell of a noise or stop altogether. The paddles pushing air into the engine don't wear so as to reduce the pressure of the charge. Are the belts slipping on the s/c pulley. is there the distinctive whine as the charger runs up?

G

w824gb3

259 posts

229 months

Friday 20th October 2006
quotequote all
I ran an XJR6 for 2 years & there was no "wall" or power steps. It was just seamless power right through the rev range. The car you have driven is faulty. Its unlikely to be engine or supercharger wear. The supercharger has an air bypass system that basically recurculates the high pressure air when its not needed to improve economy. There maybe something wrong in there or it could be an electronic fault. Get the car checked at a reputable indepentant Jag specialist.

richardxjr

Original Poster:

7,561 posts

217 months

Saturday 21st October 2006
quotequote all
Thanks for the replies. Got an indy lined up to investigate, and will try another out this weekend for comparison.

gtevo

8 posts

217 months

Friday 27th October 2006
quotequote all
well they are NOT very powerful you know....

I get far more power from a naturally aspirated motor than that old Eaton compressor system and there is no fade from running the compressor high boost.

It really wasn't a very good system from the word go, and it DRINKS fuel.

Frankly in view of the extra weight and poor handling a properly modified 4L atmo will easily outperform it and do about 10mpg better.

My atmo 3.6L does over 150mph and has fantastic fuel economy up to 30mpg

GT

groomi

9,323 posts

250 months

Friday 27th October 2006
quotequote all
gtevo said:
well they are NOT very powerful you know....

I get far more power from a naturally aspirated motor than that old Eaton compressor system and there is no fade from running the compressor high boost.

It really wasn't a very good system from the word go, and it DRINKS fuel.

Frankly in view of the extra weight and poor handling a properly modified 4L atmo will easily outperform it and do about 10mpg better.

My atmo 3.6L does over 150mph and has fantastic fuel economy up to 30mpg

GT


Jag engines are not meant to be ultimately 'powerful'. The emophasis is on smoothness and driveability, for which you need lots and lots of torque.

I agree that the Eaton 'charger is not as efficient as others, but I guess there were cost and perhaps reliabilty issues which stopped Jaguar from going for another supplier.

What model is your 3.6L? 30mpg sounds very good, as does 150mph...

gtevo

8 posts

217 months

Friday 27th October 2006
quotequote all
I put together a conversion that offends a lot of people.

It basically turns the XJS 3.6/4.0L into a V12 killer, and so V12 drivers even with 6.0L cars have a hard time!
U can check up the figures in this year's woodbridge speed trial where the 3.6L car in question hit 140mph and caned away all the 5.3L cars dead easy.
Why be upset?
It drinks HALF the juice of a V12
Will drive rings round a V12 in the corners
Brake far more safely than a V12
Has torque come in a huge slodge from 1500rpm like a diesel and remains pretty much flat to revs which are beyond the range of a V12 (6500+), all this achieved without changing the cams or original exhaust manifolds.
Do that (which I have also done), and you get the figures I am talking about.....150mph+ and if needed throttle back to a steady 80-85mph for 30mpg.

I like win-win, and nothing would ever bring me back to a thirsty compressor car or 8/12 cylinder Jaguar, never mind the age!

GT

richardxjr

Original Poster:

7,561 posts

217 months

Friday 27th October 2006
quotequote all
OK I drove another and performance is the same. The only difference between the cars was that mine has a very long accelerator travel, and the other, lower mileage one, had a quite short travel.
The other car was therefore less hard work to hussle along (different to explain what I mean there!)

I'm coming to the conclusion the Jag is just 'different' to what I'm used to. Holding gears in manual mode brings out the sort of performance I was expecting (together with audible compressor whine throughout the rev-range so I'm reassured about the blower being OK); the auto box certainly doesn't help here.

Still got her booked in with a specialist; a service and good check-over won't do any harm. By now I think a strip-down and clean of the throttle body which I've read can get a bit bunged-up may help too.

There's plenty of scope with this engine to improve the breathing, and may have a bit of a play with boost through alternative pulleys to improve the lower end. I'll be looking to add a bit of grunt without losing any refinement if poss.

Thanks for your comments & assistance

richardxjr

Original Poster:

7,561 posts

217 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
Solved

Took a while I know but it's sorted now!

Well there was a problem, was only producing 0.15bar of boost. Someone had taken the throttle and 'charger bypass valve off before, and not reassembled it correctly, so it was *always* bypassing the supercharger.

Now it's sorted, running the full 0.7bar and WHAT a transformation!

I reckon I was down 100+bhp. Let's just say I'm very happy with the performance now.

Thinking of buying an XJR-6? The problem I had is not common. Go try one, you'll love it

groomi

9,323 posts

250 months

Monday 11th December 2006
quotequote all
thumbup Good stuff!

Enjoy... driving

a8hex

5,830 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th December 2006
quotequote all
richardxjr said:
Solved

Took a while I know but it's sorted now!

Well there was a problem, was only producing 0.15bar of boost. Someone had taken the throttle and 'charger bypass valve off before, and not reassembled it correctly, so it was *always* bypassing the supercharger.

Now it's sorted, running the full 0.7bar and WHAT a transformation!

I reckon I was down 100+bhp. Let's just say I'm very happy with the performance now.

Thinking of buying an XJR-6? The problem I had is not common. Go try one, you'll love it


Good to hear you've got it sorted.

I hadn't noticed your posting before so hadn't commented. One of the people I work for occasionally drives a 740i and I often used to follow him down a section of road on the way into the office. The performance of his 740i seemed incredibly similar to my 3.2 XJ6. So if your XJR was feeling like that it must have been really sick.

johnniem

2,696 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th December 2006
quotequote all
Hi! Glad to hear that all is well with the XJR6. I have had a manual version now for almost six years and still get a buzz each time I get in her. When I first picked her up from an old family friend who happens to be a Jag indie, he told me to be blooody careful because I would never had driven a car with that much power before. He was right to a degree but the trouble is that one gets used to the power and some smaller, much less costly, cars are capable of keeping up. It can be very frustrating to have such power but not notice it!

richardxjr

Original Poster:

7,561 posts

217 months

Tuesday 12th December 2006
quotequote all
Manual must be sweet. Sounds like some subtle mods needed! Have you thought about this at all? Airfilter, exhaust, intercooler pipe wrapping plus a 10% pulley should do the trick