RE: Jaguar XKR escapes

RE: Jaguar XKR escapes

Thursday 29th June 2006

Jaguar XKR escapes

Pics of supercharged beauty now out


Jaguar XKR
Jaguar XKR
Jaguar's new supercharged sports XKR -- due to make its global debut here in the UK at the British International Motor Show -- has escaped. Pictures were due at the show but they're all over the Web.

The XKR will be produced at the company's Castle Bromwich manufacturing centre in Birmingham. In addition to being the assembly plant for three of Jaguar's four models, this is also where the aluminium bodies and structures for the XJ and XK are constructed.

If you go, don't forget to come and say hello at the PistonHeads stand (no 548).

More pictures

Author
Discussion

darren

Original Poster:

94 posts

291 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
Oh, that's the new Maserati DB9, then...

sublimatica

3,201 posts

261 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
Yuk!
New overall design is a nice update to the last one but I don't like this MaxPower bling at all. Old XKR was a much more attractive alternative to the XK8.

a8hex

5,830 posts

230 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
Why's it so slow?
The standard XK only weights about 20KG more than the AMV8, the XKR will weight a bit more sure, but not enough to counter act all that power advantage over the Aston. So why is it being quoted so much slower to 60?

stumpage

2,133 posts

233 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
I think it is absolutely gorgeous.

cathalm

606 posts

251 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
OH GOD! I think I've had an accident....

triple7

4,015 posts

244 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
WTF!!!! Who is directed at kids, or would be Jag owners! The grilles look cheap and tacky, the rest of it is fine. I agree, why a car with 116BHP more than the standard XK is only 0.5sec faster to 62mph?

G

fatboy b

9,569 posts

223 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
If you go on looks alone. Jag - 1, any current production BMW - 0. Get the Kleenex!

Edited by fatboy b on Thursday 29th June 12:43

IPAddis

2,479 posts

291 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
Lower front valance, bigger wheels, some scoops in the bonnet, some bling bits and a higher price tag. Straight out of the 1988 Escort model range, XR3i page.

cathalm

606 posts

251 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
IPAddis said:
Lower front valance, bigger wheels, some scoops in the bonnet, some bling bits and a higher price tag. Straight out of the 1988 Escort model range, XR3i page.


You mean the same thing that every manufacturer does when they release a more extreme version of an existing car? Or do you mean the same things that were on the old xkr? Quite a shocker that Jag would put bigger wheels, skirts and some vents on a top level model eh? I was expecting it to have a bootlid which clearly doesnt fit the car to follow the german trend....

Stubby Pete

2,488 posts

253 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
darren said:
Oh, that's the new Maserati DB9, then...


annodomini2

6,908 posts

258 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
triple7 said:
WTF!!!! Who is directed at kids, or would be Jag owners! The grilles look cheap and tacky, the rest of it is fine. I agree, why a car with 116BHP more than the standard XK is only 0.5sec faster to 62mph?

G


Depends how the power is delivered.

groomi

9,323 posts

250 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
Looks photoshopped to me.

r988

7,495 posts

236 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
a8hex said:
Why's it so slow?
The standard XK only weights about 20KG more than the AMV8, the XKR will weight a bit more sure, but not enough to counter act all that power advantage over the Aston. So why is it being quoted so much slower to 60?



*cough* marketing hierarchy *cough*

People need a reason to buy an AMV8 otherwise they would all see that they can get an XKR that looks the same and goes faster for cheaper. Also there is an XKR-R model coming along at some point so they need to leave some wiggle room for that as well.

I would they would change the wheels for the proper XKR as well, making me think this is possibly a fanciful XK8 photochop.

triple7

4,015 posts

244 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
triple7 said:
WTF!!!! Who is directed at kids, or would be Jag owners! The grilles look cheap and tacky, the rest of it is fine. I agree, why a car with 116BHP more than the standard XK is only 0.5sec faster to 62mph?

G


Depends how the power is delivered.


With a blooming great big supercharger! :d Doesn't seem any point in getting it for the sake of 0.5 sec

G

john_r

8,353 posts

278 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
XKR 0-60 in >5 seconds'ish?!

The XJR saloon is: heavier, bigger, less aerodynamic(?), cheaper (although no confirmed prices on XKR yet), less powerful, better equipped, not styled by Halfords and... 0-60 in 5 secs.

Although I guess my views may change if I have a mid-life crisis, become obsessive with my gym membership and buy a hair-piece!

Now where did I leave that hair dye?

Edited by john_r on Thursday 29th June 14:30

potatoboy666

108 posts

237 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
groomi said:
Looks photoshopped to me.


Agreed. That's why it looks cheap.

cathalm

606 posts

251 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
r988 said:
a8hex said:
Why's it so slow?
The standard XK only weights about 20KG more than the AMV8, the XKR will weight a bit more sure, but not enough to counter act all that power advantage over the Aston. So why is it being quoted so much slower to 60?



*cough* marketing hierarchy *cough*

People need a reason to buy an AMV8 otherwise they would all see that they can get an XKR that looks the same and goes faster for cheaper. Also there is an XKR-R model coming along at some point so they need to leave some wiggle room for that as well.

I would they would change the wheels for the proper XKR as well, making me think this is possibly a fanciful XK8 photochop.


Agreed, another couple of explanations could be that these aren't the actual figures, seeing as this isn't the actual release of info but a leak, and that perhaps the gear ratios are such on the xkr that she needs another change up to hit 62 over the standard car. either way, 0-60 is increasing meaningless these days, a standing quarter mile of some such is more indicative.

225

1,331 posts

233 months

Thursday 29th June 2006
quotequote all
Front lower mesh grill does look tacky. Hopefully these are not the final design and it will look slightly different (and a bit quicker too!)

LuS1fer

41,708 posts

252 months

Friday 30th June 2006
quotequote all
The bottom grille doesn't go with the oval grille. It would need some integrated wedge shaped grilles to fill the ascending arcs either side.

fatboy b

9,569 posts

223 months

Friday 30th June 2006
quotequote all
Official 0-60 times for XKR Coupe are 4.9 secs. Conv 5.0secs