ROC t/day @ Rockingham Sun 01 Nov

ROC t/day @ Rockingham Sun 01 Nov

Author
Discussion

fergus

Original Poster:

6,430 posts

281 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Forecast is for heavy rain. Do you guys run full wets for trackdays, or use R888 or equivalents?

martvr

480 posts

277 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Full wets on the Radical but haven't got any for the 7 so that'll be on CR500's. Gonna take a rain check biggrin on that weather forecast though, too far ahead at the moment.

splitpin

2,740 posts

204 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Being daftly superstitious, my policy is not to talk about the weather, particularly as it seems to me that despite all the kit they've got at their disposal nowadays, what they say doesn't always actually happen. Thank Heavens.

So as far as Willbee (& me) is concerned, Whatever will be will be ............ scratchchin

Willbee

340 posts

204 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
I've got my fingers crossed that the rain will hold out having never driven the Radical in the wet.

Anyone got any hot tips. Presumably keeping 'high on the exits to avoid too much of the racing lines and driving like there's an egg under the pedals (smoothly does it)?

dsl2

1,475 posts

207 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Disconnecting the roll bars front & rear is a good start.....

Depending on how grippy you find the track on the day- I found myself going faster in the wet at Donnington (which was very slippy) by concentrating on getting the car stopped accurately, into the corner apex with little or no understeer, then being pretty aggressive with the throttle on the way out. Tried carrying more speed through the corner & less throttle on the way out but was slower for me. As a contrast however Brands was so grippy in the wet you could drive like you were on slicks more or less (was only 3.5 secs ish off a full on dry lap time that day)

The PR6 is absolutely superb in the wet, with generally faithful handling & still excellent braking ability, saying that I would build up carefully before going flat out round that banking!

dsl2

1,475 posts

207 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
The general recommendation seems to be to wind the brake bias further rearward for the wet (I don't), however I wouldn't be to hasty to do that as the last thing you want is the car swapping ends whilst jumping on the brakes a tad too aggressively when in anything other than straight line.........

fergus

Original Poster:

6,430 posts

281 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
dsl2 said:
The general recommendation seems to be to wind the brake bias further rearward for the wet (I don't), however I wouldn't be to hasty to do that as the last thing you want is the car swapping ends whilst jumping on the brakes a tad too aggressively when in anything other than straight line.........
Do you know what the rationale for that is? I've never got to the bottom of it - means trail braking becomes a *very* tricky exercise!

splitpin

2,740 posts

204 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Always going to sound a bit weird to us Bikers who only ever use the brake at the back to stop the back coming round when the counter-steering needs a bit more help! Like seldom used.

Even set to maximum to the back, I suspect that on a Radical at least 60/70% will be going to the front?


RobC

967 posts

290 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
fergus said:
dsl2 said:
The general recommendation seems to be to wind the brake bias further rearward for the wet (I don't), however I wouldn't be to hasty to do that as the last thing you want is the car swapping ends whilst jumping on the brakes a tad too aggressively when in anything other than straight line.........
Do you know what the rationale for that is? I've never got to the bottom of it - means trail braking becomes a *very* tricky exercise!
Never understood it either, locking the fronts is a lot easier to control vs locking the rears eek

GeoffW

360 posts

256 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Just booked the last available place for Sunday, my first time out in the Rad this year and hoping it will persuade me to race it next year (it's currently up for sale). And now I've just read this thread predicting rain, don't mind that but makes me pleased I reserved a garage. Then again, not sure I fancy being flat out round the banking quite as much now... cheers Geoff ps pic of the circuit we'll be on (from BAT):

dsl2

1,475 posts

207 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
I believe its to do with the lesser amount of forward weight transfer when braking in the wet as there's less purchase between tyre & track surface. Therefor the rear wheels are not so lightly loaded & able to have a greater share of the braking load put through them.

splitpin

2,740 posts

204 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
dsl2 said:
I believe its to do with the lesser amount of forward weight transfer when braking in the wet as there's less purchase between tyre & track surface. Therefor the rear wheels are not so lightly loaded & able to have a greater share of the braking load put through them.
Absolutely spot on (the only difference being that you're good enough for it to be real and meaningful, whereas with me, it's purely theory!)

Without getting too anorak, on any given track, if you've got the bias set up the way you like it on a dry track, if it then rains, it almost certainly won't remain to your liking. On tarmac you get a huge weight transfer to the front under heavy braking, so if the track becomes wet, as there is far less grip, you don't get anywhere near as much of a transfer of weight; the front brakes would lock while the back would be doing bugger all. Result? A spin. That's why you increase the bias to the rear to compensate for the reduced front end weight transfer. How much bias whether dry or wet depends on your preferences; some like it 'tight', others like it 'loose'; most who know far more than any of us reckon the right starting point with a race car is just a touch of understeer.

PS Great to hear you're coming Geoff! Look forward to meeting you biggrin

Edited by splitpin on Wednesday 28th October 20:15

Willbee

340 posts

204 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
GeoffW said:
Just booked the last available place for Sunday, my first time out in the Rad this year and hoping it will persuade me to race it next year (it's currently up for sale). And now I've just read this thread predicting rain, don't mind that but makes me pleased I reserved a garage. Then again, not sure I fancy being flat out round the banking quite as much now... cheers Geoff ps pic of the circuit we'll be on (from BAT):
Great to hear Geoff. Hopefully we should all be placed next to one another. See you there!biggrin

RobC

967 posts

290 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
splitpin said:
dsl2 said:
I believe its to do with the lesser amount of forward weight transfer when braking in the wet as there's less purchase between tyre & track surface. Therefor the rear wheels are not so lightly loaded & able to have a greater share of the braking load put through them.
Absolutely spot on (the only difference being that you're good enough for it to be real and meaningful, whereas with me, it's purely theory!)

Without getting too anorak, on any given track, if you've got the bias set up the way you like it on a dry track, if it then rains, it almost certainly won't remain to your liking. On tarmac you get a huge weight transfer to the front under heavy braking, so if the track becomes wet, as there is far less grip, you don't get anywhere near as much of a transfer of weight; the front brakes would lock while the back would be doing bugger all. Result? A spin. That's why you increase the bias to the rear to compensate for the reduced front end weight transfer. How much bias whether dry or wet depends on your preferences; some like it 'tight', others like it 'loose'; most who know far more than any of us reckon the right starting point with a race car is just a touch of understeer.

PS Great to hear you're coming Geoff! Look forward to meeting you biggrin

Edited by splitpin on Wednesday 28th October 20:15
Understeer.....wash your mouth out...next you'll mention the devils tranmission (FWD) tongue out

Makes sense Darren, for me I never changed it....braking was never a problem in the wet....putting the power down...well thats another story! biggrin

dsl2

1,475 posts

207 months

Thursday 29th October 2009
quotequote all
I hate understeer with a passion too Rob, what I try to get is a front end that goes where I point it & as a consequence end up with a slightly oversteery back end that helps take the turn out of the corner.

But being brought up on powerful Caterham's I do tend to like a bit of oversteer!






splitpin

2,740 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th October 2009
quotequote all
Hey ease up guys. I said a touch of understeer, meaning that side of the neutral line; I should have said that and added "the merest whiff". With 100% neutral or the merest whiff of understeer, the car should go exactly where it's pointed and oversteer should be available on demand.

As to Caterhams etc, with their handling dynamics, don't you simply decide how much oversteer you want to deal with? hehe

fergus

Original Poster:

6,430 posts

281 months

Friday 30th October 2009
quotequote all
Does anyone have a spare propeller they can bring with them on Sunday? A bouyancy aid would also be appreciated thumbup

http://news.bbc.co.uk/weather/forecast/4272 click on the rolling forecast on the map image and scroll to 'Sunday'.....

splitpin

2,740 posts

204 months

Friday 30th October 2009
quotequote all
Thanks for the POETS Day Pep Talk hehe

I'll forever take comfort in the Michael Fish Factor ............. so much technology and still a country mile out laugh

martvr

480 posts

277 months

Friday 30th October 2009
quotequote all
Not getting much better is it? No doubt that 'little system' has to pass across the UK some time but I was hoping they'd got their timing wrong and it would either have passed or still be approaching. Time yet smile!

If it doesn't change I'll probably be supporting you guys a bit more obviously as I've a set of wets for the Rad instead of slipping and sliding around on CR500s.

Anybody know about allocated garages? I've booked one and will be in no. 25.

Edited to add that I blame that Rob C guy tongue out . Every time so far has been a downpour for the first half easing to a wet / dry / wet second half. Observation of Sundays conditions will be made and inevitable comparisons will follow biggrin

Edited by martvr on Friday 30th October 21:19

splitpin

2,740 posts

204 months

Friday 30th October 2009
quotequote all
martvr said:
If it doesn't change I'll probably be supporting you guys a bit more obviously as I've a set of wets for the Rad instead of slipping and sliding around on CR500s.

Anybody know about allocated garages? I've booked one and will be in no. 25.

Edited by martvr on Friday 30th October 21:19
Like they say "Every Cloud Has A Silver Lining" !

I've asked Jonny what two garages the Rads wwill be in, but he has yet to reply .......... I'll ask again and when I know I'll post up.