New ZT Images Out

New ZT Images Out

Author
Discussion

Muncher

Original Poster:

12,220 posts

256 months

Tuesday 27th January 2004
quotequote all
http://gallery.mg-rover.org/showgallery.php/cat/3139



Can't say I like it, has been toned down and has lost it's identity, no agression. It is possible to specify a Rover 75 with most (if not all) of the ZT options now That also includes a 4.6 V8 75.

I much prefer the old one

RichB

52,748 posts

291 months

Wednesday 28th January 2004
quotequote all
Looks like a sort of big Hyundi or other aisian car trying to be a limo' Sorry, but that's NOT a good styling job. Rich...

markpetrie

478 posts

255 months

Monday 9th February 2004
quotequote all
Not keen on new ZT at all. Its too much a Bentley wanna be type look. I much prefer the olde one

Newromancer

703 posts

269 months

Wednesday 11th February 2004
quotequote all
RichB said:
Looks like a sort of big Hyundi or other aisian car trying to be a limo' Sorry, but that's NOT a good styling job. Rich...


Yeah, I think you nailed it on the point.

But much more interesting for me is, how does it look on the inside? The old Version looked pretty muchlike a Rover with a leather-package For the price differense I would expact a bit more.

havanatopia

47 posts

248 months

Friday 5th March 2004
quotequote all
Chaps, sorry you got it all wrong about the new V8 MG/75.

Mate of mine is in Geneva and he is normally very critical of rover but he is amazed at the styling, the fabulous quality of the interior [makes the X type - which i never liked and thought was cramped - look like a mondeo which it is of course! ] and the sensational design when you get up close and personal which is exactly what i intend to do real soon.

the new grille is not bentley at all and even if it was this car wants nothing other than to be a true thoroughbred rover - it is pure Rover from the P5 days - audi nicked it like they do most things. can't wait to see it for real and swap in my ZT 160 which is Gorgeous as well.

>> Edited by havanatopia on Friday 5th March 19:38

>> Edited by havanatopia on Friday 5th March 19:38

Jimmer

729 posts

259 months

Thursday 11th March 2004
quotequote all
Mondeo is much more spacious than any 75/ZT, but going back to Havanatopia's comment about the V8...
I too heard that the V8's finish is superb, inside and out, and that the grille doesn't look so bad in the flesh.
If Rover can price a fully loaded 75 V8 against a mildly equipped mid-range 6 cylinder Merc/BMW they should have a winner on their hands - assuming that punters put their prejudices aside, and that Rover survive long enough to make it...

Muncher

Original Poster:

12,220 posts

256 months

Friday 12th March 2004
quotequote all
I don't think the 75 is any less spacious at all, there's already plenty of room in the mk1 75, with even more in the mk2 as the seats were adjusted to give more space front and back.

Supersonic

1,163 posts

269 months

Friday 12th March 2004
quotequote all
V.nice, although I still prefer the beautiful original.

hut49

3,544 posts

269 months

Friday 12th March 2004
quotequote all
Hopefully the new ZT-T body will take another slice of ££s off the 2002/3 models so I can pick up a used ZT-T190 at an even better price. Amazing value - just can't find a fully-loaded metallic black one at the moment.

gorrieman

84 posts

251 months

Thursday 22nd April 2004
quotequote all
I think the posts about it being a Limo from Asia, were directed towards the new ZT.....not the V8 75....which has a completely different front end.

The styling between the 2 models at the front end are dramatically different.

I really didn't like the picture of the ZT 260 either....but after seeing one in the flesh at the weekend...I'm perhaps... nah... sorry.. V8 75 is still miles nicer.

Strange that the Rover V8 derivative now looks much more in yer face than the MG model.