BHP

Author
Discussion

David Ryan

Original Poster:

70 posts

230 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
I noticed on an old posting by Fastbuck that he had checked the BHP of his 300 and foud it to be only 256 BHP.This was in his case due to the boost pressure from the supercharger being about half of what it should have been.

Has anyone else taken the trouble to check their BHP on a dyno or rolling road? Did it match the quoted figures?

I assume that the quoted Atom BHP's are measured at the crank and not at the wheels.

D.

datasafe

911 posts

236 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
I think James (fatsbuck!) has done more than anyone else in BHP stats etc, so he's your man.

JC

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
"Fatsbuck" im just big boned.
Anyway ,the supercharger as standard runs at 5 psi(all Atom 300's will run at this power).
Ariel THOUGHT they were running at 9 psi, but there not.
I've had 3 seperate rolling dyno tests and they all came out at around 260 bhp which is right if your charger is running at 5 psi.
If my charger was running at 9 psi i would have 300bhp.
Anyway, i've added 20 bhp so in Ariels eyes i've got a 320 but in my honest opinion ive got a 280bhp Atom.
Still the fastest Atom in the world i think!
p.s i'm have an intercooler made as we speak that will add on another 30bhp. 700bhp per ton, that fast enough for you.

datasafe

911 posts

236 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
Interesting! So when is an Atom 300 NOT an Atom 300??

Is there a procedure for getting the 9psi?

JC

>> Edited by datasafe on Saturday 30th July 16:50

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
of course, but it costs and you must have a cooler of some sort, we'll talk more when you've got your Atom.

datasafe

911 posts

236 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
Has anybody done a head to head - straightline speed test between the various Atoms?

I know it's not the definative as drivings skill & technique will vary but would be interesting to see how a 300 does against a 245 and 220 etc over say 1/4 mile.

JC

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
I would love that, i'm doing Santa Pod again on the 21st of August it would be great to have another Atom there(especially a 300).

monza

205 posts

246 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
Fast buck
Are your BHP on the wheels or somewhere else ?
If it's on the wheels you can add 10 to 11% to have the engine power, so 260 + 10% = 286 BHP, not far from the 300 announced by Ariel.
Ariel wrote me that they are between 5 and 6 psi with 550 injectors on the supercharged Atom, is it your configuration ?
I have asked ariel for an intercooler on my future Atom 300, not really to win HP, but to win on liability on hot summer trackday ! They have asked Jackson Racing for that.
JP

atom120

268 posts

236 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
fast buck said:
I've had 3 seperate rolling dyno tests and they all came out at around 260 bhp which is right if your charger is running at 5 psi.
So is the supercharger only adding 15bhp over the Atom 245? The most expensive 15bhp ever?

>> Edited by atom120 on Saturday 30th July 18:12

datasafe

911 posts

236 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
Conversly, is the 245 pushing out 200??

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
monza; from the factory mine was 5 psi with 550 injectors.Which is 260 bhp.

It's now 7 psi with 650 injectors which added a TRUE 20 hp.
p.s Your a better man than i am if you can get an intercooler from Jackson.

monza

205 posts

246 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
so you are speaking of BHP on wheels, not on clutch.
When a manufacturer annouces power, it's always on clutch.
My first Atom 220 was dyno-tested between 197 and 200 BHP on wheels and the transmission "loose" was exactly 10%, so about 220 on clutch. I'm not sure that the Hondata really gives 25 HP more after having driving one, but the engine is more drivable and smooth with less exhaust pollution, so agood choice ...
Conclusion : with 5 psi and 550 injectors, the supercharger gives about 5O-60 HP more.
JP

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
monza; power tests taken from the crank.

Honda civic type r jap spec engine= approx 210bhp
Hondata ecu= approx 20bhp
Jackson supercharger at 5 psi= Approx 30bhp
All dyno tests are different, some are kind to the customer and some are true.
It all depends on your re mapping and how fast your base engine is in the first place, but put it this way, i know a supercharged atom running at 5 psi will not produce 300bhp.
Unless something is wrong with my car(ive been told it's fine)there have been exagerations on the power outputs with supercharged Atoms.

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
clutch/crank i presume thats the same, not at the wheels.

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
the hondata ecu is in question but is needed to run the supercharger, proper speed freaks use a K Pro ecu rather than the k100 then you can re map it from your own lap top and run racing fuel!

monza

205 posts

246 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
Crank : i don't know what it is, if it's after the gear-box and LSD, it's similar result to wheels.
If it's before, i would like to know how it is possible to make the test without putting out the gearbox ???

If "crank" is like "cardan" in french, the result will be more accurate than on wheels, but very similar.
JP

Hart

48 posts

272 months

Saturday 30th July 2005
quotequote all
Possibly these 300 BHP are American prototype racing ponies invented by Joe McCarthy.

Search in SELOC, the lotus enthusiasts' forum and in Elise Talk Forums and also read Corky Bell`s books about Turbo- and Supercharging.

BTW: Thank you Dave for starting this thread. That`s mainly why I was still looking from time to time into this forum.

And be care full with your money however you make it .

Hartmut

David Ryan

Original Poster:

70 posts

230 months

Sunday 31st July 2005
quotequote all
It seems like I have opened a can of worms here.

Atom do quote 300 bhp for the 300 model and in fairness that is what the engine should produce.

From the responses on the forum one could suppose that this may well not be the case and also calls into question the true bhp output of the other engine options.

Bruce usually knows the answer to all things Atom but it would certainly seem sensible to ask Ariel for some accurate information.

I was seriously considering ordering a 300 but will certainly not spend the extra money if it does not do what it says on the tin. I would appear that Fast Buck is having to invest a lot of time and money to get where he should have been in the first place.

If the supercharger is only running at 5 psi, which is a very low boost pressure, it is hardly worth having. Any form of forced induction creates higher engine temps and must therfore be accompanied by additional cooling measures. This may be difficult to achieve given the Atom's design and weight constraints.

In any event, I would like to know the correct engine outputs before ordering.Most manufacturers quote bhp and torque figures at the crank. This involves attaching the drive shaft of the engine to a dyno. This can not realistically be done when the engine is mounted in the vehicle. Rolling road sofware will measure the output at the driving wheels and then extrapolate the crank BHP. There are a lot of rolling road test centres around the country and they usually charge about £60 to run a test for you. Why not get your Atoms tested?

D.

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Sunday 31st July 2005
quotequote all
"Atom do quote 300 bhp for the 300 model and in fairness that is what the engine should produce."

Tell me about it!!!!!! don't start me off again.

fast buck

238 posts

233 months

Sunday 31st July 2005
quotequote all
"It would appear that Fast Buck is having to invest a lot of time and money to get where he should have been in the first place."

If I had a true 300hp and i must add a true 500 kilo car i would be a happy man.
I have spoke to Ariel about this and there answer was that all rolling roads differ, ....... but 3 seperate ones being the same!!! make your own mind up.
At the end of the day I love the car to bits and wouldn't give it back, it's the fastest one they do, so that is that.
Mine was weighed at 600 kilos, very little fuel.
Even if i took my back wing off and changed my wheels to Mags it wouldn't be 500 kilos and i've got carbon fibre panels!
But i presume all scales are different too and i did only weight it once.
217.5 hp at the wheels and 600 kilos is not what it says on the tin! but love it anyway.
As you can see this has taken some of my time up so, if anyone has a 300 or 275 out there a dyno test would be interesting as i've just spent 40k on a car which is not 600bhp per ton. views greatly accepted.

>> Edited by fast buck on Sunday 31st July 09:14