no viper classified?

[hazzardv8]

so where can you advertise a viper?,not on pistonheads,there is no subsection under dodge

[sophia123]

I have one to list but can't seem to be able to work it out either!

[Viper]

the 'Viper' kit car guy threatened PH with legal stuff,
so the area was removed a few months ago

[woolfie]

but the cars which were badged dodge viper..cant be retrospectively changed, makes no sense, as the term is used in printed publications.......

[viper_larry]

There's a Dodge > SRT-10 section which you can put it in. Not ideal, but best you can do.

[hazzardv8]

what about RT/10 and GTS sections?

[hazzardv8]

an answer please,(moderator)where can we advertise vipers, or parts on pistonheads?

[PetrolTed]

Please stick 'em under SRT-10 for now. Anyone wanting a Viper will know to look there.

I've had someone on my back about the trademark which is why the name was changed. I've taken advice on the matter (££££!) and for now the simplest solution is to leave the category badged as is.

Edited by PetrolTed on Tuesday 12th September 18:40

[hazzardv8]

ted,
what is wrong with GTS/RT10? this title makes no mention of the dreaded word v*per ,or does this 'person'own those terms too?
an SRT10 is a completely different car!
john

[PetrolTed]

Category now named "SRT-10/GTS/RT10"

Happy?

Edited by PetrolTed on Wednesday 13th September 20:00

[Viper]

cool, thanks PT

SRT-10/GTS/RT10 that sounds like Bazs car
LOL

Edited by Viper on Wednesday 13th September 20:18

[bigviper]

dose that mean baz,s car is a gen 321, should change its name to Dusty Bin

[V1PER]

Its a GEN 2.5 and abit....

[woolfie]

its a 'kin viper....just back in from a long day /night. Mr Ted work out a way of letting people advertsise their Vipers..by not differentiating..So its just Dodge. Then we can use the word Viper in our descriptions. Simple. People who are not afficiandos do not understand the other badged names.

[viper paul]

Check out Exchange and Mart and Autotrader both still list Viper.

For gods sake it was made as a VIPER and advertising it as not a Viper may leave you open under the Trades Description Act for not describing the item correctly.

[hazzardv8]

i think this has to be a reasonable compromise with the risk of very expensive legal action looming
john