Legality of selling a frame with V5

Legality of selling a frame with V5

Author
Discussion

Stevie_P

Original Poster:

562 posts

184 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Hopefully the BB crowd can help with this one.

My brother has recently broken up a 1998 Fireblade to use the engine in a kit car project. (I know - sacrilege to some people).
He's selling / sold most of the bits but is unsure of the legality of selling the frame with the V5.
I have seen breakers doing this but I guess it could be open to plenty of abuse (Cloning / Ringing etc).
Is it legal?
Is it ethical?
The frame itself is slightly damaged though most of this is polished out.
It does mean however, that I doubt people would use it for a resto project etc.
Any thoughts?

srob

11,848 posts

245 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
I've just sold a Norton Featherbed frame with a V5.

Can't see any problems at all unless it's written off of course!

TallPaul

1,518 posts

265 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Yes, it is perfectly legal to sell a frame with a V5. The question you need to ask yourself is what use would that frame and V5 be to somebody.
Ringing will be the answer in 95% of the cases.

Biker's Nemesis

39,624 posts

215 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Theres no problem selling a bike without an engine.


Stevie_P

Original Poster:

562 posts

184 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
Theres no problem selling a bike without an engine.
Yes but it's just the frame as he's sold most of the other parts as well.

Biker's Nemesis

39,624 posts

215 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Stevie_P said:
Yes but it's just the frame as he's sold most of the other parts as well.
Still no problem, its his to do as he pleases.

3doorPete

9,927 posts

241 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
TallPaul said:
Yes, it is perfectly legal to sell a frame with a V5. The question you need to ask yourself is what use would that frame and V5 be to somebody.
Ringing will be the answer in 95% of the cases.
It's a cheap way of long term storing a private plate without incurring annual retention fees too.

catso

14,853 posts

274 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Stevie_P said:
Biker's Nemesis said:
Theres no problem selling a bike without an engine.
Yes but it's just the frame as he's sold most of the other parts as well.
Nothing wrong at all with it, I recently bought a frame with V5 as the basis for my current Monster project. Would have been cheaper to have bought a complete bike but that's another story...

Stevie_P

Original Poster:

562 posts

184 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
Still no problem, its his to do as he pleases.
Thanks all. I'll let his conscience decide.

TallPaul

1,518 posts

265 months

Thursday 7th April 2011
quotequote all
3doorPete said:
It's a cheap way of long term storing a private plate without incurring annual retention fees too.
Thats a very good point, I hadn't thought of that!
Although dont both vehicles need to be MOT'd & taxed?

catso

14,853 posts

274 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
TallPaul said:
3doorPete said:
It's a cheap way of long term storing a private plate without incurring annual retention fees too.
Thats a very good point, I hadn't thought of that!
Although dont both vehicles need to be MOT'd & taxed?
Not if it's on SORN.

Hooli

32,278 posts

207 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
catso said:
TallPaul said:
3doorPete said:
It's a cheap way of long term storing a private plate without incurring annual retention fees too.
Thats a very good point, I hadn't thought of that!
Although dont both vehicles need to be MOT'd & taxed?
Not if it's on SORN.
I believe it'd need to still have tax n MOT for the plate to be transferred to it.

bass gt3

10,364 posts

240 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Biker's Nemesis said:
Theres no problem selling a bike without an engine.
Thats called a 600 isn't it??

catso

14,853 posts

274 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
Hooli said:
catso said:
TallPaul said:
3doorPete said:
It's a cheap way of long term storing a private plate without incurring annual retention fees too.
Thats a very good point, I hadn't thought of that!
Although dont both vehicles need to be MOT'd & taxed?
Not if it's on SORN.
I believe it'd need to still have tax n MOT for the plate to be transferred to it.
Maybe but once transferred surely it is the same as any other vehicle? so free long-term storage.

catso

14,853 posts

274 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
bass gt3 said:
Biker's Nemesis said:
Theres no problem selling a bike without an engine.
Thats called a 600 isn't it??
rofl

Hooli

32,278 posts

207 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
catso said:
Hooli said:
catso said:
TallPaul said:
3doorPete said:
It's a cheap way of long term storing a private plate without incurring annual retention fees too.
Thats a very good point, I hadn't thought of that!
Although dont both vehicles need to be MOT'd & taxed?
Not if it's on SORN.
I believe it'd need to still have tax n MOT for the plate to be transferred to it.
Maybe but once transferred surely it is the same as any other vehicle? so free long-term storage.
True. So if the frame has MOT sell it quick while it's worth more.

VeeFour

3,339 posts

169 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
3doorPete said:
It's a cheap way of long term storing a private plate without incurring annual retention fees too.
Not really, no.

To get the plate back off the frame, you need tax and MOT on it. Last time I checked, you couldn't MOT a bare frame.

The other problem is that, once the plate is on a bike, you can't put it on a car - so you have to be really sure that you're only ever going to want to use it on a bike.

bimsb6

8,172 posts

228 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
VeeFour said:
Not really, no.

To get the plate back off the frame, you need tax and MOT on it. Last time I checked, you couldn't MOT a bare frame.

The other problem is that, once the plate is on a bike, you can't put it on a car - so you have to be really sure that you're only ever going to want to use it on a bike.
not true ,you can transfer bike to car but not car to bike .

joreco

185 posts

214 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
When did that rule of car to motorcycle come in? I have swapped a plate between car and bike and back again with no problem, albeit on both times bike and car were currently taxed.

3doorPete

9,927 posts

241 months

Friday 8th April 2011
quotequote all
VeeFour said:
3doorPete said:
It's a cheap way of long term storing a private plate without incurring annual retention fees too.
Not really, no.

To get the plate back off the frame, you need tax and MOT on it. Last time I checked, you couldn't MOT a bare frame.

The other problem is that, once the plate is on a bike, you can't put it on a car - so you have to be really sure that you're only ever going to want to use it on a bike.
Fair enough - just checked with DVLA - another con if you ask me. I'm sure it didn't used to be that way as I know of some wrecked classics that had their plates taken in 90's by my God dad's business.
Don't see why it needs to be taxed, insured and MoT'ed to transfer. They also say the vehicle must be available for inspection.

Government gravy train.