No rear footrests = MOT Failure?

No rear footrests = MOT Failure?

Author
Discussion

scorcher

Original Poster:

4,008 posts

240 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
Seems a bit harsh but presumably its part of the MOT. Guy at work has a DT125 and is a learner so is highly unlikely to be carrying a passenger. Surely a full licence holder would refuse to be a passenger with no pegs?Presumably single seaters are exempt ,but how about a sportsbike with a removable plastic seat hump?

shibby!

923 posts

204 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
Mine passed in October there with no rear foot rests.

I did have the plastic cover on though.




B3njamin

1,129 posts

193 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
My Aprilia RS125 passed its MOT with the rear foot pegs removed.

pozi

1,723 posts

193 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
You only need rear foot pegs if you are carrying a pillion, Mr MOT tester is not interested if they are there or not.

RemaL

24,995 posts

240 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
I am not inured to carry pillion, rear footrests have been removed and blank plates put on. and have a seat cowl on so no one can use the rear pillon seat. I can't see that being a issue \I hope

Dontlift

9,396 posts

264 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
If he fails you on that, i would be talking to the authorities and questioning his ability to carry out a bike MOT

Johnny

9,652 posts

290 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
No bh pegs on mine for the last few years, never had an issue come MOT time...

Hooli

32,278 posts

206 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
My mate was told you dont need pilly pegs if there is a grab rail or its a single seater.

Nels0n

235 posts

187 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all

@well

41 posts

208 months

Wednesday 3rd February 2010
quotequote all
I don’t have passenger pegs on my Firebolt but do have a seat cowl, the MOT tester mentioned it at the last test and wrote single seat only on the certificate.

y2blade

56,202 posts

221 months

Thursday 4th February 2010
quotequote all
NO

3doorPete

9,924 posts

240 months

Thursday 4th February 2010
quotequote all
No footpegs on my 7R although there was a plastic seat cover on the pillion seat. Sailed through MoT.

Pothole

34,367 posts

288 months

Thursday 4th February 2010
quotequote all
Nels0n said:
nobody looks at links here...

Pillion foot rests are not required on motor bicycles that only have a single seat. In addition some motor bicycles used on or after 14 June 1993, which are intended to carry a passenger may not be fitted with footrests but with hand holds attached to the motor bicycles frame adjacent to, or part of the seat. Refer to manufacturers information eg owners handbook

MarJay

2,174 posts

181 months

Thursday 4th February 2010
quotequote all
Yes he's right, although a DT125 is a bit of a grey area because competition enduro bikes have long seats so riders can move their weight forward and backwards to negotiate obstacles.

I'd try to argue the case, but for the sake of a couple of pillion pegs I might just cave in.

fieldarcher

2 posts

111 months

Thursday 23rd July 2015
quotequote all
My sons RS125 has failed its mot with one cause being no rear footrest. On checking this, VOSA state that a bike with a pillion seat must have foot rests. 6.2 . Therefore a tester has the right to fail your bike, however most are unlikely too, if that is the only reason for a failure, especially if its a small bike.

Desiato

959 posts

289 months

Thursday 23rd July 2015
quotequote all
shibby! said:
Mine passed in October there with no rear foot rests.

I did have the plastic cover on though.
Mine has a seat cowl and I had removed the left hand peg and bracket, but left the right side as it also holds the exhaust. When it was MOT'd this year the tester removed the peg and pin as he said if there is one there must be both, but neither was fine. He gave me the bits in a bag.
Fine by me as I never carry pillions, and the sort of service I expect from my regular bike shop.

accident

582 posts

262 months

Thursday 23rd July 2015
quotequote all
my understanding is,
seat and no pegs = fail.
seat cover = no seat

graham22

3,297 posts

211 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
Desiato said:
Mine has a seat cowl and I had removed the left hand peg and bracket, but left the right side as it also holds the exhaust. When it was MOT'd this year the tester removed the peg and pin as he said if there is one there must be both, but neither was fine. He gave me the bits in a bag.
Fine by me as I never carry pillions, and the sort of service I expect from my regular bike shop.
Could have told him Heather Mills is your girlfriend.



Alex@POD

6,307 posts

221 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
It's nice to find helpful MOT testers like that. I took the car for MOT once and the tester found the exhaust hangers had snapped off. I explained I would go and weld them on but it would take me a couple of hours to drive home and back, so he just pulled his welder out and tacked them on himself to pass it smile

gsxr renegade

126 posts

121 months

Friday 24th July 2015
quotequote all
Yup, as above, i've had an MOT man mention it to me before - if it has the facility to carry a passenger (pillion seat basically) then it must have rear footrests.

With no passenger footpegs and the little plasitc cowl in place you'll be fine.

(Luckily my MOT man was lenient and let me off)