Tuono V4 1100 engine thoughts

Tuono V4 1100 engine thoughts

Author
Discussion

Caddyshack

Original Poster:

11,831 posts

213 months

Tuesday 23rd July
quotequote all
I an considering a Tuono V4 and before I travel to test ride I wanted to gather some thoughts on the engine power delivery and smoothness.


I had an Aprilia RS660, it was a great bike but I did not really like the power delivery and sound of the Twin engine, it had lots of low down torque but zero reward for revving it out, it just went a bit diesel turbo like at the top and ran out of puff. I swapped this for a 2012 GSXR 600 and that screams to 15,500 with a swelling reward for each extra rev you pile on and it sounds like a 90's F1 car.

I then added a V2S 2023 Multistrada 950 Ducati as a comfy cruiser for longer journeys but I find the engine a bit vibey being a V twin, I thought that it would not bother me as a longer distance bike but when I am on slower roads I still find it a bit chuggy and again, it goes flat over 9000. I added a link pipe and re-map which helped but still not perfect.

I wondered if the V4 Tuono is a smooth engine compared to the twins, I know with 175hp - 190hp I wont be able to rev it out much on the road but does it ride smoothly, less vibes than a twin and reward when you do open up the engine...if not I guess it will be something like an S1000R but liked the small fairing on the Tuono.

I will book a test ride but just an hour in the seat doesn't always tell you what it's like after the honeymoon period.

airsafari87

2,859 posts

189 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Epic.

milu

2,419 posts

273 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
I’ll keep an eye on replies to this too. I still have my Tuono 660 which I enjoy. But I do fancy a couple more cylinders and the 1100 seems quite the machine. Probably too quick for me really.

For reasons I can’t explain, I quite fancy the Suzuki GSX S1000 naked. The most recent version.
Just a bit tamer than the V4 Aprilia

trickywoo

12,305 posts

237 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
The only negatives I’ve heard is that it can be chuggy right at the bottom but who rides it there anyway.

The other one I’ve heard from a few different people, all with big bike experience, is that the power delivery can be a bit scary at times in the way it piles on in a bit of a spikey way.

STe_rsv4

783 posts

105 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
I moved from a 2010 RSV4 (so the 1000cc not 1100) down to the RS660. I know what you mean about the "dieselly" top end as I still manage to keep hitting the rev limiter as I cant distinguish the sound of the revs when pushing on.

Sounds obvious but you will find on the V4 that it has so much extra grunt compared to the 660 that you wont be using the top end of the rev range and will mostly be sat below 8k RPM. When you do get to use that band above 8k its so rewarding as you get that throaty V4 increasing howl but as you will be doing north of 120mph in 2nd/3rd , it will be rare you get to enjoy this unless you live in the north of Scotland ;-)

The V4 doesn't like being below 4k rpm so its not enjoyable when in town or slow roads and expect your legs and balls to be roasted in traffic as the rear headers cook you!

Krikkit

26,995 posts

188 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
STe_rsv4 said:
The V4 doesn't like being below 4k rpm so its not enjoyable when in town or slow roads and expect your legs and balls to be roasted in traffic as the rear headers cook you!
My Tuono 1100 doesn't do the cooking thing.

Fuelling below 4k is a bit rough, the only tricky bit is behaving in 20mph limits.

Otherwise it's an absolute gem of a motor, I think it's very smooth and bags of power/torque everywhere. I'm in love with mine.

Caddyshack

Original Poster:

11,831 posts

213 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Thanks all for the notes.

I wonder if the fuelling might be better with a Cat off remap which would richen it up?

Caddyshack

Original Poster:

11,831 posts

213 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
milu said:
I’ll keep an eye on replies to this too. I still have my Tuono 660 which I enjoy. But I do fancy a couple more cylinders and the 1100 seems quite the machine. Probably too quick for me really.

For reasons I can’t explain, I quite fancy the Suzuki GSX S1000 naked. The most recent version.
Just a bit tamer than the V4 Aprilia
The GSXS 1000 naked was on my hit list before I bought the multistrada, the only things that put me off are: the electronics suite (traction etc) is very basis compared to others like the Tuono, It may be too similar to my GSXR and I should try something more different and the total lack of fairing might make it bad for long journeys. (My friend has the 750 and he said the wind is bad on dual carriageways and he is experimenting with small screens.

It is a cheap second hand buy though and that appeals.

The engine is also very responsive to tuning as it was tamed a lot for the naked, I believe it has something like 70% throttle locked when at 100% on the wrist so you get a lot more performance with the throttle locks off.

Steve Bass

10,364 posts

240 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
One of the best engines ever... great low end, zinging top end (in RSV4 form) and the best sound bar none...

You won't regret it

GreaseNipple

429 posts

248 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
I've got a '22 RSV4, the engine is lovely, smooth and with a great midrange, not buzzy through the bars or pegs like an inline four might be. The quickshifter and blipper are very good too. It does 'chug' under 2.5k ish but compared to an LC4 it doesn't count as chugging to my mind! Top end isn't the most exciting, it doesn't die away but doesn't reach a crescendo either. I test rode a tuono when I was buying but can't really remember any big differences in the engines apart from there was a noticeable difference in power

Caddyshack

Original Poster:

11,831 posts

213 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Thanks, I think I will book a test ride then.

Appreciate the input.

rev-erend

21,536 posts

291 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Another tuono v4 factory owner here.

The 1100 v4 engine is epic. Moto GP soundtrack.

Handling is fantastic.

Clutch being cable can be hard work in towns with heavy traffic.

Very comfortable.

Low speed fueling is much better in race mode, weird I know.

KobayashiMaru86

1,329 posts

217 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
I'm still partially considering one too but yet to test one. My issue is my nearest dealer is Fowlers in Bristol and I'm in Swansea so if I have issues it's a faff to get back there.

Freakuk

3,463 posts

158 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Mate has the latest 1100 so we've swapped bikes a few times on runs out (me on my Gen3 SDR). Engine is lovely, makes a lovely noise with an Akra, silky smooth, but didn't wow me, it's not a brute like my SDR which I am comparing against. Still a lovely motor.

What I will say is being 6ft tall it felt a little cramped for my frame/legs, it made it feel a bit like riding a toy. Also, the clocks were pretty dated in this day and age, again it's subjective.

He's had a few issues with it though, sump leaking and now has no fuel gauge which apparently is a common issue, the sender fails, but the part hasn't been updated so will ultimately fail again (2 years old by the way just out of warranty) so he's not going to bother replacing it for it to fail again. His only other issue is the lack of dealers near him, most are a good 90 mins to 2 hours away.

Caddyshack

Original Poster:

11,831 posts

213 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Freakuk said:
Mate has the latest 1100 so we've swapped bikes a few times on runs out (me on my Gen3 SDR). Engine is lovely, makes a lovely noise with an Akra, silky smooth, but didn't wow me, it's not a brute like my SDR which I am comparing against. Still a lovely motor.

What I will say is being 6ft tall it felt a little cramped for my frame/legs, it made it feel a bit like riding a toy. Also, the clocks were pretty dated in this day and age, again it's subjective.

He's had a few issues with it though, sump leaking and now has no fuel gauge which apparently is a common issue, the sender fails, but the part hasn't been updated so will ultimately fail again (2 years old by the way just out of warranty) so he's not going to bother replacing it for it to fail again. His only other issue is the lack of dealers near him, most are a good 90 mins to 2 hours away.
I was a little worried about things like common issues as the RS660 wasn't without it's faults. Nearest dealer to me is Brighton which is about 40 miles.
I am 6ft and quite long in the leg so that is a consideration.

I have stayed away from the SDR due to also hearing reliability issues and also the big thumper engine again, I understand it is one of the best bug thumpers but still a bug thumper.

Krikkit

26,995 posts

188 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Freakuk said:
Mate has the latest 1100 so we've swapped bikes a few times on runs out (me on my Gen3 SDR). Engine is lovely, makes a lovely noise with an Akra, silky smooth, but didn't wow me, it's not a brute like my SDR which I am comparing against. Still a lovely motor.
Very much chalk and cheese in terms of motors aren't they - the 1100 is definitely more like a traditional high-RPM performer.

The guy I bought my Tuono off has bought a Superduke gen 4 to replace it for something completely different.

Caddyshack

Original Poster:

11,831 posts

213 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Freakuk said:
Mate has the latest 1100 so we've swapped bikes a few times on runs out (me on my Gen3 SDR). Engine is lovely, makes a lovely noise with an Akra, silky smooth, but didn't wow me, it's not a brute like my SDR which I am comparing against. Still a lovely motor.
Very much chalk and cheese in terms of motors aren't they - the 1100 is definitely more like a traditional high-RPM performer.

The guy I bought my Tuono off has bought a Superduke gen 4 to replace it for something completely different.
The high RPM performer is defo my scene, as one poster above mentioned - banging in to the rev limiter is annoying where the engine is flat at the top and you do not realise you are at the peak. My V2S does this easily.

Freakuk

3,463 posts

158 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Caddyshack said:
Freakuk said:
Mate has the latest 1100 so we've swapped bikes a few times on runs out (me on my Gen3 SDR). Engine is lovely, makes a lovely noise with an Akra, silky smooth, but didn't wow me, it's not a brute like my SDR which I am comparing against. Still a lovely motor.

What I will say is being 6ft tall it felt a little cramped for my frame/legs, it made it feel a bit like riding a toy. Also, the clocks were pretty dated in this day and age, again it's subjective.

He's had a few issues with it though, sump leaking and now has no fuel gauge which apparently is a common issue, the sender fails, but the part hasn't been updated so will ultimately fail again (2 years old by the way just out of warranty) so he's not going to bother replacing it for it to fail again. His only other issue is the lack of dealers near him, most are a good 90 mins to 2 hours away.
I was a little worried about things like common issues as the RS660 wasn't without it's faults. Nearest dealer to me is Brighton which is about 40 miles.
I am 6ft and quite long in the leg so that is a consideration.

I have stayed away from the SDR due to also hearing reliability issues and also the big thumper engine again, I understand it is one of the best bug thumpers but still a bug thumper.
I'm not trying to sway you, I've pretty much only ridden twins my whole biking like (nearly 30 years now), this includes racing and track days. My SDR hasn't been any less reliable than any other bike I've owned, and certainly better than others. So I would take your fears/concerns witha pinch of salt.... And I will say the Gen3 has by far the best twin engine I've experienced in terms of smoothness and the torque is wild, it completely blows me away how easy it is around town and then an animal when unleashed. I never change rider modes just stick it in performance so I would expect low down to be bad, but it isn't by any stretch. Is it IL4/V4 smooth... possibly not, but it's damn good.

I've not ridden a Gen4 (Gen3.5 if you like) yet so I don't know if it's a leap forward or just an improvement.

airsafari87

2,859 posts

189 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
Freakuk said:
I'm not trying to sway you, I've pretty much only ridden twins my whole biking like (nearly 30 years now)
I think that’s the key thing here.

Last year I looked at swapping my Tuono V4 for an SDR. I had a canny test ride on it but it left me feeling a little underwhelmed. Not because it’s a poor bike, not because it doesn’t have a great engine, not because inferior to the V4, it purely because it’s different to what I like and am used to.
It’s a conversation I had with the salesman at the time and various other people since. It seems as though you’re either a Superduke type of person or a V4 Aprilia type of person. Both absolutely stonking bikes, just in different flavours.

From your comments on your 660, and I have a 660 Tuono in the garage as well, It sounds as though you’d also be a ‘Tuono guy’ as well rather than a ‘SDR guy’.

FWIW. I’m 6’-2” and my Tuono Factory is probably the most comfortable bike I’ve owned. I can do full day rides on it in total comfort.

Yes they have their niggles, mine has had the fuel sender thingy problem, it’s had the oil weep problem and a couple of other issues. All dealt with without quibble by the dealer and nothing which would stop me from going out and buying another V4 Tuono tomorrow, and the day after, and the day after.

KurtFlew

421 posts

60 months

Wednesday 24th July
quotequote all
This thread is good timing as I'm looking to change from my ZX10 to a Tuono in the next few weeks...I love the screaming IL4 but I rarely ride it up at 12krpm+ on the road, and the riding position is slowly killing me.