Discussion
I had a KTM500 motocrosser, fitted a new chain & sprockets and had (mistakenly) set the chain too tight to allow for the full suspension travel.
First ride out over some bumps & rough stuff on a local green lane and the chain snapped, rather the clip link broke/came off and the rest of the chain was fine.
Fitted a new link, loosened the chain and all was good again so, on that experience I would deduce that the link is in fact the weakest link.
As such I wouldn't fit one on a powerful/heavy bike though, I suppose you could argue that the link breaking on my KTM might have saved greater damage...
First ride out over some bumps & rough stuff on a local green lane and the chain snapped, rather the clip link broke/came off and the rest of the chain was fine.
Fitted a new link, loosened the chain and all was good again so, on that experience I would deduce that the link is in fact the weakest link.
As such I wouldn't fit one on a powerful/heavy bike though, I suppose you could argue that the link breaking on my KTM might have saved greater damage...
airsafari87 said:
I would, while wearing shorts.
And the loud, straight through can would sound epic when the bike hits the limiter after the chain flys off.
I take it you'll be wearing a t-shirt with your shorts so you'll get the lovely sensation of skin on tarmac when the chain locks up the rear wheel and throws you up the road at .5 beyond warp speed? And the loud, straight through can would sound epic when the bike hits the limiter after the chain flys off.
So the last couple of replies kind of highlight the reason for this question.
Perceived wisdom says no but, as said, there are many examples where clip links are used with no issues.
If a 520 chain is OK on a 50hp enduro bike and a 200hp track weapon (accelerated stretching accepted) is the clip link such a weak link on a superbike but ok for the enduro....
Just thinking out loud like......
Perceived wisdom says no but, as said, there are many examples where clip links are used with no issues.
If a 520 chain is OK on a 50hp enduro bike and a 200hp track weapon (accelerated stretching accepted) is the clip link such a weak link on a superbike but ok for the enduro....
Just thinking out loud like......
Steve Bass said:
So...
Based on our survey......
What's the limit, capacity or BHP beyond which you wouldn’t use a clip link chain?
Given a 520 is a 520 where is the threshold for riveted vs clip??
see my previous reply, it shouldnt make any difference, but for some reason i prefer a rivit, the plates arent any difference, so they shouldnt be any different torque difference, but would always prefer a fixed link than a clip that can fly off. there is no reason why a split link should be weaker.Based on our survey......
What's the limit, capacity or BHP beyond which you wouldn’t use a clip link chain?
Given a 520 is a 520 where is the threshold for riveted vs clip??
Steve Bass said:
So...
Based on our survey......
What's the limit, capacity or BHP beyond which you wouldn’t use a clip link chain?
Given a 520 is a 520 where is the threshold for riveted vs clip??
When did the manufacturers start fitting "endless" final drive chains? 80 bhp? 90 bhp? When the O-ring chain arrived? My 68 bhp CB750 had a 530, or 5/8 x 3/8 as it was then, split link in 1975.Based on our survey......
What's the limit, capacity or BHP beyond which you wouldn’t use a clip link chain?
Given a 520 is a 520 where is the threshold for riveted vs clip??
Gassing Station | Biker Banter | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff