Why I hate tail tidies

Why I hate tail tidies

Author
Discussion

Tribal Chestnut

Original Poster:

3,001 posts

188 months

Tuesday 14th September 2021
quotequote all
Worst fooking bike mod ever.


Tribal Chestnut

Original Poster:

3,001 posts

188 months

Tuesday 14th September 2021
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
It will be coming off, don’t worry, just need to source an OEM one. st comparison btw.

Jazoli

9,199 posts

256 months

Tuesday 14th September 2021
quotequote all
I agree, they are a stupid invention made for gixxer riders who only go out when the sun is shining with no chance of rain, I have removed plenty off bikes I've bought and would never fit another as they are form over function and not fit for purpose.

carinaman

21,897 posts

178 months

Tuesday 14th September 2021
quotequote all
Your helmet will be feeling all matt and dusty and too.

Carlososos

976 posts

102 months

Tuesday 14th September 2021
quotequote all
I thought rear huggers were meant to stop the rubbish flying up? I loved my tail tidy. It made my tail look tidy.

Jazoli

9,199 posts

256 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
Carlososos said:
I thought rear huggers were meant to stop the rubbish flying up? I loved my tail tidy. It made my tail look tidy.
Huggers do stop the underside of the tail of the bike getting filthy but they don't stop the spray from the rear of the tyre that ends up all over your jacket and helmet and ends up running down the back of your neck.

snagzie

540 posts

66 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
Jazoli said:
I agree, they are a stupid invention made for gixxer riders who only go out when the sun is shining with no chance of rain
U wot m8

Dog Star

16,387 posts

174 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
Jazoli said:
I agree, they are a stupid invention made for gixxer riders who only go out when the sun is shining with no chance of rain, I have removed plenty off bikes I've bought and would never fit another as they are form over function and not fit for purpose.
Form over function? They're not even that - there is no "form"; they just look gash, most have a tiny little bracket that leaves the plate jammed, flapping, up against the tailpiece, invariably at an odd angle. They just look really Heath-Robinson. R&G - I'm looking at you.

This sort of thing..... vomit



or check out this aesthetic masterpiece.....





snagzie

540 posts

66 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
Dog Star said:
Jazoli said:
I agree, they are a stupid invention made for gixxer riders who only go out when the sun is shining with no chance of rain, I have removed plenty off bikes I've bought and would never fit another as they are form over function and not fit for purpose.
Form over function? They're not even that - there is no "form"; they just look gash, most have a tiny little bracket that leaves the plate jammed, flapping, up against the tailpiece, invariably at an odd angle. They just look really Heath-Robinson. R&G - I'm looking at you.

This sort of thing..... vomit



or check out this aesthetic masterpiece.....

Pretty confident that the originals were worse!

Dog Star

16,387 posts

174 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
snagzie said:
Pretty confident that the originals were worse!
No. No. No.

Freakuk

3,389 posts

157 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
Carlososos said:
I thought rear huggers were meant to stop the rubbish flying up? I loved my tail tidy. It made my tail look tidy.
The issue with modern bikes is that they've made the seat units smaller so the rear wheel is now exposed, I think by law that the bodywork has o extend beyond the back wheel, to get around this manufacturers fit huge/long plate holders to extend the bike but knowing full well it will get replaced with a tail tidy and provide the aesthetics that they originally intended.

I have to agree, I've never fitted one in 20+ years until my current SDR1290R because the numberplate was a good foot on a bracket to meet the above, it does look much better but I have exactly the same crap on my back now.

Matt_E_Mulsion

1,706 posts

71 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
I've had a tail tidy on my R6 since I bought it back in 2003. The original item it left the showroom with was hideous. Mine is only a toy so I don't tend to go out in the rubbish weather to find out how much crap gets flung up.

clive_candy

688 posts

171 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
snagzie said:
U wot m8
Liked this.

TheInternet

4,878 posts

169 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
How well do these arrangements function?


Jazoli

9,199 posts

256 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
TheInternet said:
How well do these arrangements function?

Very, although I did fit a tail tidy to my MT09 as I thought it looked terrible hehe

TimmyMallett

2,971 posts

118 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
I dont like them either, unless you have a gopping back end that has those awful US 'fenders', having said that, I'm not entirely sure they stop your back getting filthy, as you're sat on top of the bike, forward of the back wheel, isn't more of that to do with low pressure behind you sucking it into your back? Ir is the lack of TT to break up that low pressure creating the issue?

catso

14,844 posts

273 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
TheInternet said:
How well do these arrangements function?

Don't know but that type of plate just looks shyte...

lukeyman

1,025 posts

141 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
TheInternet said:
How well do these arrangements function?

The number plate bracket is the least of that bike’s problems!

Fastdruid

8,819 posts

158 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
Freakuk said:
Carlososos said:
I thought rear huggers were meant to stop the rubbish flying up? I loved my tail tidy. It made my tail look tidy.
The issue with modern bikes is that they've made the seat units smaller so the rear wheel is now exposed, I think by law that the bodywork has o extend beyond the back wheel, to get around this manufacturers fit huge/long plate holders to extend the bike but knowing full well it will get replaced with a tail tidy and provide the aesthetics that they originally intended.

I have to agree, I've never fitted one in 20+ years until my current SDR1290R because the numberplate was a good foot on a bracket to meet the above, it does look much better but I have exactly the same crap on my back now.
^ *THIS*

It's a form over function lunacy because every manufacturer seems to want to design a MotoGP bike...then apparently gets surprised after it's all been signed because they have to fit indicators, tail lights, reflectors and a registration plate. So they hand it to the work experience lad to knock something up on Friday while they go down the pub and then sign off his 10 minutes of half arsed stty work after a heavy liquid lunch because no one gives a fk and all the promotional photos will be taken without it.

They are almost without exception utter gash. Stupid wky registration plate on a stick because the tail is too fking small. Or worse the abortion that is the stupid "thing" hanging off the swingarm. fk them all.

The regulations should not be a surprise. fk the MotoGP replicas. Design something that looks good *while* taking the regulations into account not something that only looks good after you've ripped massive bits of plastic off. It's not rocket science.

gareth_r

5,926 posts

243 months

Wednesday 15th September 2021
quotequote all
Most bikes - well, most nakeds - remind me of ste German streetfighters rather than MotoGP. smile





Edited by gareth_r on Wednesday 15th September 12:05