RE: BMW M5

Thursday 4th March 2004

BMW M5

V10 powered fat man car could hit the streets in 12 months


After some leaked pictures appearing last week we've now got official word from BM about the next M5.

Translating Formula 1 technology directly into a road car, the BMW Concept M5 is powered by a massive V10 engine – a BMW first. It's joined the power struggle in Germany and BMW have raised the ante by de livering around 500 bhp and 500 Nm of torque.

Such levels of performance are made possible by specially modified Bi-VANOS camshaft timing, individual throttle butterflies and engine electronics derived from the BMW Williams F1 car. These are linked to an enhanced DSC traction control system, a variable limited slip differential and adapted brakes

Alongside the engine developments, Formula 1 technology is carried over to the gearbox. The Concept M5 is equipped with a seven-speed Sequential Manual Gearbox – another first for BMW.

Under the skin, the BMW Concept M5 is based on the 5 Series saloon launched in 2003, both cars benefiting from an aluminium chassis and lightweight aluminium front body panels. Visually, the BMW Concept M5 stands apart from its ‘standard’ 5 Series brethren by the addition of modified front and rear air dams, side sills, side air vents and four exhaust tailpipes. Additionally, it has M alloy wheels of an exclusive design measuring 8.5J x 19 on the front and 9.5J x 19 on the rear, with 255 / 40 ZR 19 and 285 / 35 ZR 19 tyres respectively.

BMW are claiming that the the show car is strictly a concept, but adding that a production version of the car could (will) be available within a year.

Author
Discussion

dino ferrana

Original Poster:

791 posts

258 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
I see they still haven't managed to make the boot look like it actually is shut!

britten_mark

1,593 posts

259 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Yes, it gets no better looking does it? Usually when they make a "GT" version of some twat-chariot it always manages to look vaguely appealing; not this time eh?

dick dastardly

8,315 posts

269 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
I've got to disagree with you guys, I think it's gorgeous. Can't wait to see them on the road

Frik

13,546 posts

249 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Seems like a bit of a styling oppotunity missed. BMW's M cars are usually at least more visually exciting than their equivalents at Merc. What about the M-style mirrors? Then again, it seems you can't polish a Bangle designed turd...

powelly

490 posts

288 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Front air dam from a mondeo? Wing mirrors from a compact? Design from a turd?

craigw

12,248 posts

288 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
be an interesting comparison with the new audi rs6 which will have the gallardo engine..

The Witchfinder

94 posts

251 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Completely hideous. Hopefully they'll be sub-25 grand in three years' time like the old one

bad company

19,355 posts

272 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Well I think it looks great and I cant wait to get my hands on one. I put a deposit down about a year ago so I will be at the front of the queue.

chippy69

3,740 posts

249 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
I think it looks great, I remember people saying the E39 looked rubbish when it first came, they also (I know it's a cliche)look much better in the flesh,
The M5 was always supposed to be the subtle M car and the M3 was supposed to be lairy and in your face


>> Edited by chippy69 on Thursday 4th March 13:38

conner

131 posts

257 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Is it me or does it look like a TVR!!!!!!

ScoobyZoom

6,578 posts

254 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
conner said:
Is it me or does it look like a TVR!!!!!!


just you mate

thanuk

686 posts

269 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
I mostly like it, but even with 19" wheels it's still looks like the back wheels are too small. The wedge shape does that I guess.

conner

131 posts

257 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
thanuk said:
I mostly like it, but even with 19" wheels it's still looks like the back wheels are too small. The wedge shape does that I guess.


See SCOOBY DOO!!!!


Thank you Thanuk for point out which model of TVR it looks like.
It's the WEDGE I should of guessed!!!

medic_02

12 posts

248 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
V10 and 500hp... i know there are no displacement figures but damn, i can see the viper/truck engine hp/liter arguments coming.

flooritforever

861 posts

249 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
BMW said:
...a massive V10 engine producing 500 bhp and 500 Nm of torque


With those kind of figures it can afford to be ugly! Can't wait to see the performance stats for this thing.

Dogsharks

427 posts

252 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Well let's hope BMW can figure out what connecting rod bearings are for and avoid all the blown up motors they had with the M3. BMW can build a powerful motor, but they seem to have designed in some major flaws in the past. I hope they fired that engineer, who-ever the heck it was.

http://members.roadfly.com/jason/m3engines.htm

Dogsharks

>> Edited by Dogsharks on Thursday 4th March 18:59

laner

127 posts

261 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Well i for one would be happy to be sat in it!!

B 7 VP

633 posts

248 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Specifcation Looks the BIZ, Do we hope they got it right with the Bi-Vanos ??.Many E36 M3 car owners are still paying for being the development Department of M tec, Garching.

Waveboy14

276 posts

250 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
Like the front very much, getting used to the back, but the roofline reminds me of the previous Lexus 430LS! (not nice!)

neon_fox

379 posts

290 months

Thursday 4th March 2004
quotequote all
I don't think it looks like a TVR, but it sure is 'urg-ley' enough!

Am I the only person slavering over a seven-speed sequential _manual_ box?

Fox in a Box
---