RE: BMW 645Ci Convertible

RE: BMW 645Ci Convertible

Tuesday 1st June 2004

BMW 645Ci Convertible

Robert Farago goes gliding


 
 
The instant you fire-up BMW’s new 645Ci, a chime buried deep in the dash rings out.  “BLING!”  In fact, it does it twice:  BLING!  BLING!  Point taken.  From its backlit kick panels, to the chrome “eyelids” over the kidney-shaped grills, to the gigantic wheels and tires filling massive, flared arches, the 645Ci boasts more street style than a Bronx block party.  The hard-top 6 seeks a home with BMW’s traditional Euro-snob consumers, but the drop-top 6 wants to chill on the driveway of one of MTV’s crib-tastic celebs.       

And why not?  Forget all that wind-in-the-hair BS.  Anyone who’s actually owned a convertible knows the genre is an open invitation to sunburn, sunstroke, earache, deafness, bad hair and (lest we forget) decapitation.  Convertibles are all about posing.  A $76k Beemer cabriolet is, by its very nature, a technological tour de force.  But it don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that bling. 

Like I said, the 645Ci is all that.  A large part of the car’s gangsta chic is down to BMW’s infamous “flame surfacing”: the exterior style currently afflicting the 5 and 7-Series.  This time it works.  The 645Ci’s farrago of bulges, curves, creases, cuts and canvas is so odd, so utterly different depending on the viewing angle, even jaundiced car reviewers find themselves staring in silent wonder.  Sure, the design will date faster than a theoretically divorced Brad Pitt.  Meanwhile, the 645Ci’s eye-candy street cred reigns supreme.    

BMW 645Ci Convertible If onlookers somehow manage to miss the point, just press the roof button.  Mercedes may have invented the flipping, turning, rotating and stowing tin top routine, but the 645Ci’s canvas version is no less impressive, and you get a heated glass window that pops back up to [slightly] deflect unwelcome wind.  How dope is that?        

So why is the 645Ci’s cabin as austere as a monk’s cell?  iDrive.  The universally reviled mouse controller replaces the ever-mounting array of switches and dials needed to control a luxury car’s festival of toys, which leaves… nothing much.  BMW’s designers have made ample use of this nothing much, spreading it around the cabin evenly, blending it with black plastic, leather and brushed aluminum; to no appreciable effect whatsoever.  No props to them, then. 

Hopefully, BMW will extend its “Individual” program to the 645Ci.  Discerning buyers could then bling-up their convertible Beemer with, say, orange leather seats, a champagne leather dash and piano-finished black interior trim stripes.  Given the 654Ci’s funereal functionalism and the drop-top driver’s need to show off, even the oddest choices are bound to make perfect sense.  

BMW 645Ci Convertible You may have noticed that I haven’t said a word about what it’s like to drive the 645Ci.  So here’s the word: numb.  Numb steering.  Numb gearbox.  Numb chassis.  Numb brakes. 

I’ve got nothing against numb cars.  Mercedes originally earned my affection by building luxury transportation so completely devoid of sensation you felt as if you’d beamed yourself to your destination.  But times have changed; even Lexus offers drivers a dose of road feel (albeit highly filtered).  You’d hardly expect BMW, self-proclaimed provider of the “ultimate driving machine”, to create a car that harkens back to the glory days of brain-dead luxo-barges.    

The 645Ci’s engine adds to the sense of disappointment-- because it’s so good.  The 4.4-liter V8 is a bit sluggish (numb?) at low revs, but once it inhales a proper hit of gas, it’s like rousting a lion with a pointy stick.  Thanks to a "variable-effect resonator" in the exhaust system, the soundtrack switches from contented purr to demented roar, and the 645Ci leaps into action. 

Zero to sixty takes six seconds - not bad for a car weighing over two tons.  The company claims their all aluminum powerplant gets the job done with just 325hp, but I’d swear The Boys from Bavaria are hiding an extra 50 horses somewhere.  Again, you’ve got to stoke the engine above 3600rpms to gain access to maximum shove (330ft.-lbs. of torque), but once you do, you’ll be glad you did. 

Until you come to a corner.  The weird thing is that the 645Ci actually corners quite well.  Its Active Roll Stabilization system tightens-up the big Beemer’s roll bars on the appropriate side to create astounding poise through the curves.  But there’s no joy in it.  Remote control steering, stiff run-flats and a no-motion chassis makes it nearly impossible to judge what the car is up to at any given moment.  If you don’t switch off the handling nanny, the only indication that fun’s out there - somewhere - is a sudden and dramatic loss of engine power.  

BMW 645Ci Convertible And there you have it: a posemobile that’s sexy, fast and dynamically dull.  If you’re a wealthy buyer who enjoys “stunting” and “flossing”, or are prepared to learn what that means, the 645Ci is your ride.  If you like driving, your Porsche awaits. 

Author
Discussion

Rambofanso

Original Poster:

79 posts

255 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
Looks a bid like the old fasioned Saab!
Actually the sylist needs sacking!
He ought to look at Pininfarina, Giugiario or Bertone for inspiration
:shoot

dinkel

27,112 posts

264 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
"If you’re a wealthy buyer who enjoys “stunting” and “flossing”, or are prepared to learn what that means, the 645Ci is your ride.  If you like driving, your Porsche awaits."

Robert, which Audi compares?

The Admiral

74 posts

251 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
I had a shot of a 645i at Rockinham (along with M3CSLs etc) and I Loved it - it's engine sounds fabulous (especially with the top down), it's engine and transmission were spot on, and it handles beautifully - excellent turn in, little roll, enough power to be adjustable... Will maybe be able to afford one second-hand in 10 years or so...

alanb

26 posts

290 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
Saw one in the flesh yesterday - outside the local Majestic booze warhouse. Roof down, I thought it looked great. 2 tons though.... more than 4 times my Caterham!

Marki

15,763 posts

276 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
The M6 will be interesting mhhh V10 mhhh

The Wiz

5,875 posts

268 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
Think its quite a nice looking car actually.

Marki

15,763 posts

276 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
The Wiz said:
Think its quite a nice looking car actually.


i am over the "Bangle" effect now , i like the 7 i am getting used to the 5 , and this is ok , the trouble is the new 6 will of cource be compared to the old 6 which was such a gracefull looking car its hard to better

agent006

12,058 posts

270 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
Rambofanso said:

Actually the sylist needs sacking!
He ought to look at Pininfarina


Go and find a Hyundai Matrix. That's styled by pininfarina.

veewhy

708 posts

258 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
There's more than a hint of Carrera about it from the profile, it even alludes to the rear wheel arches with their flared out wide flanks. All in all though, it's just a pile of automotive confection that looks very overstyled.

RichB

52,528 posts

290 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
Marki said:

The Wiz said:
Think its quite a nice looking car actually.



i am over the "Bangle" effect now , i like the 7 i am getting used to the 5 , and this is ok , the trouble is the new 6 will of cource be compared to the old 6 which was such a gracefull looking car its hard to better

Hummm, to me a shit car always looks shit.

Bodo

12,405 posts

272 months

Tuesday 1st June 2004
quotequote all
Marki said:

The Wiz said:
Think its quite a nice looking car actually.



i am over the "Bangle" effect now , i like the 7 i am getting used to the 5 , and this is ok , the trouble is the new 6 will of cource be compared to the old 6 which was such a gracefull looking car its hard to better

The only of the recent beemers which had grown on me is the Roller. And hey - I'd even see myself in one. Chauffeured of course

Honest now. The 7' isn't that bad because it is big enough, but the 5' and the 6' have ugly light arrangements, and look too cramped/enforced individually. IMHO

kevinday

12,028 posts

286 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2004
quotequote all









I cannot see the point of this car, other than as Robert describes it - a posemobile.

oagent

1,893 posts

249 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2004
quotequote all
obviously at 2tonnes it will never handle as well or hit 60 as quick as the old 635CSI but from all accounts BMW have succeded in making a good merc 500SEC type barge. Maybe once the styling house (still not sure which one they intend using) have ripped off all those horrid pannels used to discuise the final look of the thing from the press it will look nicer.

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2004
quotequote all
It actually weighs 1.7 tonnes. That is 300kg less than 2 tonnes or the weight of three to four people.

jumjum

347 posts

264 months

Wednesday 2nd June 2004
quotequote all
They are atually supposed to be superb drive, lots of mags

The americans have got the coupe to grip to 0.94g on a 200ft skid pan, thats actually better than an M3 and up with a 996 turbo, at 1700kg it might not transfer the weight so well, but on the grip it's impressive.

I still think it looks a bit too funny, but that review smacks of bias, just like Jermey Clarkson slaggging off something perfectly good just for the sake of it

GRIFF2

2 posts

245 months

Thursday 3rd June 2004
quotequote all
Of all the ridiculous looking new BMW fleet, this one takes the biscuit. Golf club 'comittee chairmen' everywhere lining up at local dealership to test drive. Whatever happened to BMW??????

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Thursday 3rd June 2004
quotequote all
Err, they continued to make fantastically engineered cars that people buy. They introduced controversial avant-garde styling that is not to everyone's taste.

GRIFF2

2 posts

245 months

Thursday 3rd June 2004
quotequote all
err, yes, and fantastically overpriced for what you get, or do not get if you are at all interested in 'driving'.

Zod

35,295 posts

264 months

Thursday 3rd June 2004
quotequote all
compared to plastic cars from Blackpool perhaps, but not when compared with the products of Mercedes and Porsche.

RichB

52,528 posts

290 months

Thursday 3rd June 2004
quotequote all
Zod said:
compared to plastic cars from Blackpool perhaps, but not when compared with the products of Mercedes and Porsche.
Wow are they massivly overpriced as well then