Discussion
I had the pleasure of driving one that had that horrible tip type box. wasn't nioce, but you'd get used to it after a while I suppose. handling felt very nice indeed, and was like a dart, however, the 138 bhp is weak, and perhaps they should have given a 190 option, as in the celica.
The MK2 Turbo is the monster I would have , should both be standard. It has real performance, and very good handling, considering it's weight. get a turbo, or sc kit on the MK3, and it will be the choice for me.
Andy Mac said:
I had the pleasure of driving one that had that horrible tip type box. wasn't nioce, but you'd get used to it after a while I suppose. handling felt very nice indeed, and was like a dart, however, the 138 bhp is weak, and perhaps they should have given a 190 option, as in the celica.
The MK2 Turbo is the monster I would have , should both be standard. It has real performance, and very good handling, considering it's weight. get a turbo, or sc kit on the MK3, and it will be the choice for me.
Considering your post appeared right next to that ad for an uber souped up mk3 that could be your answer
steve bowen said:
Pre Cats, If you get an MR-S get the precats ripped out asap.
Go on a m3 club and search pre cats, world of pain
Go on a m3 club and search pre cats, world of pain
I've now searched on the MR2 Roadsters forum and have found an excellent guide to removing the pre-cats with all the whys and wherefores. However, it doesn't seperated between MR2 and MR-S. So is there any difference?
I have found avery promising MR-S locally, but want to make sure there is no performance spec difference first...
Gassing Station | Japanese Chat | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff