Intercooler upgrade - MR2 Turbo

Intercooler upgrade - MR2 Turbo

Author
Discussion

Top Trump

Original Poster:

1,588 posts

227 months

Thursday 6th April 2006
quotequote all
Hi jap chatters, I'm new to this addictive forum and thought it was about time I joined in.

I've got an MR2 Turbo Revision 3, which I've had for about 6 months. I've been tweaking it here and there and have decided that I want to replace the stock intercooler with a better aftermarket one.

My question is, with my current mods (3" exhaust, decat downpipe, manual boost controller set at 1 bar amongst other things) will fitting a more effective intercooler significantly reduce turbo lag? It's not that it's bad at the moment but it would be nice if I could shapen up the throttle response a bit more. I want to get as much torque at low revs as possible for everyday driving.

Anyone with an MR2 or similar done this and had good results?





hookster

95 posts

243 months

Thursday 6th April 2006
quotequote all
not 100% sure with the mr2, but fitting a larger core usually increases lag due to the extra volume the air has to fill in the cooler, may not be noticable depdning on the size of it. however a more efficient cooler will increase torque low/mid range esp if the car has been sitting in traffic as the charge will be cooler into the engine than before. once moving though or on cold days theres probably not much difference unless the standard cooler is restrictive in its design.

you can make a big difference by taking off the cooler and washing it out with carb cleaner or petrol to get rid of any oil build up.

its worthwhile mod for modified cars as it give a bigger safety margin before det sets in.

MrFlibbles

7,706 posts

289 months

Thursday 6th April 2006
quotequote all
I always wanted the GT4 chargecooler upgrade when I had my tubby, but never got round to it.

Would that be a better option for you perhaps?

Mr E

22,054 posts

265 months

Thursday 6th April 2006
quotequote all
MrFlibbles said:
I always wanted the GT4 chargecooler upgrade when I had my tubby, but never got round to it.

Would that be a better option for you perhaps?


Where would you mount the additional rad?

MrFlibbles

7,706 posts

289 months

Thursday 6th April 2006
quotequote all
Mr E said:
MrFlibbles said:
I always wanted the GT4 chargecooler upgrade when I had my tubby, but never got round to it.

Would that be a better option for you perhaps?


Where would you mount the additional rad?


AFAIK the other rad gets mounted at the front - possibly at the expense of the aircon rad, but Im not too sure tbh.

Laterally thinking though, surely if the CC sits on top of the block, surely the rad could be side mounted in the room left front the i/c removal?

Top Trump

Original Poster:

1,588 posts

227 months

Thursday 6th April 2006
quotequote all
I've thought about a GT4 charge cooler but they are tricky to fit and more expensive (I think). As for the rad, it would have to go at the front - I've heard that a Fiat Cinquiento rad is up to the job but is fiddly to fit.

The advantage of fitting an intercooler is that it is side-mounted and fits straight into the standard spot. Less work involved.

My aim is to have as little turbo lag as possible. Although, it has to be said, the MR2 isn't bad in this respect. Full boost comes on at around 3-3,500rpm with peak torque probably around 5,000rpm.

Apart from the obvious benefits of more power (mid-high revs) and more resistance to detonation, I always thought that fitting an intercooler in the same spot (without longer pipes) would mean more torque at low revs - the best of both worlds. As Hookster points out, it may actually increase lag, so I'm not so sure now.

MrFlibbles

7,706 posts

289 months

Thursday 6th April 2006
quotequote all
An upgrade from the manual boost controller to a a full on electronice jobby might help. Most people comment on the improved response when they've fitted a decent EBC.

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

261 months

Thursday 6th April 2006
quotequote all
Front mounted IC gives you a lot more lag, as it has a far higher volume of air in it, die to all the piping. Keep it at the same and get an uprated one. I personally think the stock one is up to the job. Maybe work on getting some nice fresh air to it?

_Al_

5,587 posts

264 months

Friday 7th April 2006
quotequote all
From the owners club: The stock item isn't particularly wonderful, some people claim great things from the GReddy upgrade. Charge coolers are quite a neat solution but tricky to put on.

Andy: As I understand it the front-mounted rad with the charge cooler is for liquid coolant, the air-charge doesn't actually flow through it. From what I've seen the charge cooler would be the lowest lag solution as the air-flow is the most direct and involves the least direction changes.

That said I've never seen a cutaway so I might be totally wrong.

In your shoes I'd start with a GReddy and take Gazs' advice on the EBC.

MrFlibbles

7,706 posts

289 months

Friday 7th April 2006
quotequote all
_Al_ said:


In your shoes I'd start with a GReddy and take Russ' advice on the EBC, that Gaz then verified


*cough*

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

261 months

Saturday 8th April 2006
quotequote all
_Al_ said:

Andy: As I understand it the front-mounted rad with the charge cooler is for liquid coolant, the air-charge doesn't actually flow through it. From what I've seen the charge cooler would be the lowest lag solution as the air-flow is the most direct and involves the least direction changes.


My mistake. I thought he was on about an FMIC. Never connected it with any sort of charge cooler.

Has anyone thought about Water injection as a simple solution? Allows a nice tweak in boost too!

tuttle

3,427 posts

243 months

Saturday 8th April 2006
quotequote all
Andy Mac said:

Has anyone thought about Water injection as a simple solution? Allows a nice tweak in boost too!

Good thinking, it's really fairly easy(famous last words),light & cheap to setup too(kits start from sub £150 ,Aquamist are a top brand though more £££.Not many componants to fit, & bar the pump & nozzles most parts used can be plastics,so fabbing & fitting presents less probs. Hey! & once you've got H2O Inj you're only a step away from running some form of methanol inj, Alky is good

Homemade H2O inj

Top Trump

Original Poster:

1,588 posts

227 months

Sunday 9th April 2006
quotequote all
I know of a Greddy spec Intercooler that can be had for around £400, which is cheaper than the Greddy. It's supplied by a guy called Chris, who's an MR2 owner club affiliate ( the trades under the name GTSChris). It's called the 'Berk' intercooler and is, according to tests, actually better than the Greddy. It comes with fan, shroud, all hard pipes and looks to be top quality, so I'm tempted.

On reflection, I think my original question about turbo lag wasn't quite accurate. I think the intercooler will not reduce lag as such, but rather have the 'effect' of reducing it, as torque is increased with the onset of colder denser air flowing into the engine. I'm hoping that with a side-mounted intercooler in the original spot, throttle response will be better (feel more 'on it'), more like a NA engine. Also, with the 3" decat downpipe and exhaust in place it should make for a more responsive car.

This is my first turbo car. I've had beemers in the past, so I'm still learning the ways of forced induction. I love it by the way, and tweaking the car to suit the way you want it to drive is half the fun.

Thanks for your replies.

MrFlibbles

7,706 posts

289 months

Sunday 9th April 2006
quotequote all
I've heard good things about GTSChris in the past. I remember when I had my downpipe fitted it made a world of difference!

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

261 months

Sunday 9th April 2006
quotequote all
I remember him from my MR2 days over on t'other forums! Website here for anyone lurking...

www.gtschris.com/store/comersus_index.asp