MR2 Turbo

Author
Discussion

gorvid

Original Poster:

22,286 posts

231 months

Monday 20th February 2006
quotequote all
What are the vital statistics for this little fella?

0-60 etc.....(I know..I know..I used to own one....)

But I don't recall ever getting the stats..

gorvid

Original Poster:

22,286 posts

231 months

Monday 20th February 2006
quotequote all
I don't think mine ever went as well as it should have.......

shadowninja

77,404 posts

288 months

Monday 20th February 2006
quotequote all
I've seen slightly slower quotes for 0-60mph. High 5 seconds.

bad_roo

5,188 posts

243 months

Tuesday 21st February 2006
quotequote all
Mine goes a lot slower because I have no skills.

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills.

shadowninja

77,404 posts

288 months

Tuesday 21st February 2006
quotequote all
bad_roo said:
Mine goes a lot slower because I have no skills.

Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills.


Surely getting there in 5.2s is a Bad Thing?

Dakkon

7,826 posts

259 months

Tuesday 21st February 2006
quotequote all
I thought it was around 5.5 for a rev 3's + slightly slower for the rev 1 & 2's, happy to be corrected.

The biggest trouble with em is that its one change at around 30mph then your changing from 2nd at around 60mph.

One of the reasons the Mac F1 is so quick 0-60 is it can do 70 in 1st gear.

gorvid

Original Poster:

22,286 posts

231 months

Tuesday 21st February 2006
quotequote all
One of the other reasons being 627BHP

ApexClipper

25,563 posts

249 months

Tuesday 21st February 2006
quotequote all
Tell me Gaz, what made you go from the MR2T to the Supe?

Reading between the lines, I get the impression you miss the MR2 now....

choc

328 posts

224 months

Tuesday 21st February 2006
quotequote all
arnt they stupidly tailhappy?

MrFlibbles

7,706 posts

289 months

Tuesday 21st February 2006
quotequote all
choc said:
arnt they stupidly tailhappy?


I dont think so, my fists of made of ham, and even with provocation i've never had a problem with mine.

timmy30

9,325 posts

233 months

Thursday 23rd February 2006
quotequote all
choc said:
arnt they stupidly tailhappy?


The Rev 1 Mk II cars were, Rev 2 got improved suspension which overall lowered the car by a couple of cm and largely sorted out the tail happiness. Mine is an original Rev one though, and provided you know the car I have no problems at all.

MrFlibbles

7,706 posts

289 months

Thursday 23rd February 2006
quotequote all
Is that your in your profile Tim?

Thats not a turbo is it?

Dakkon

7,826 posts

259 months

Thursday 23rd February 2006
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
ApexClipper said:
Tell me Gaz, what made you go from the MR2T to the Supe?

Reading between the lines, I get the impression you miss the MR2 now....


Err yes

Timmy30

9,325 posts

233 months

Thursday 23rd February 2006
quotequote all
MrFlibbles said:
Is that your in your profile Tim?

Thats not a turbo is it?




That's the fella. It's an NA so no, not a turbo.

By the way those horrid little Delta wheels are going, just bought a set of Fox 17" alloys to replace them.

Are those 17" inchers on yours? What tyres are those by the way? They look mean!



>> Edited by Timmy30 on Thursday 23 February 17:19

MrFlibbles

7,706 posts

289 months

Thursday 23rd February 2006
quotequote all
Timmy30 said:
MrFlibbles said:
Is that your in your profile Tim?

Thats not a turbo is it?




That's the fella. It's an NA so no, not a turbo.

By the way those horrid little Delta wheels are going, just bought a set of Fox 17" alloys to replace them.

Are those 17" inchers on yours? What tyres are those by the way? They look mean!

>> Edited by Timmy30 on Thursday 23 February 17:19


Lol, I was gonna mention the 3 spokes but thought better of it

Tyres are Eagle F1s in 235/40/17 rear and 215/40/17 front. Tramlines like buggery and is a bit dodgy in snow / ice but grip in "normal" conditions is great - I wouldnt use anything else. (That said, I did get that set at trade price )

I think its been dropped 20mm as well, but i'm not sure.

Turbo T

1,382 posts

254 months

Thursday 23rd February 2006
quotequote all
Every couple of Months I have thoughts of building a mad one.

_Al_

5,587 posts

264 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
Thought I'd best stick an oar in... Even with REALLY provocative behaviour on wet tarmac mine behaves perfectly (Rev2 turbo- same as MrF).

I'm running on absolutely useless koni suspension with standard size Toyo T1-S tyres. I used to have a mis-matched set of budgets on it. Handled beautifully anyway, though nowhere near as much grip.

I can understand Gaz trading up for a Supra. I can never drive past one without genuinely considering it but that said, I'd never want to loose the tubby.

I've only owned it since autumn but I've already had some utterly unbeatable drives in it. I can't imagine any car for sensible money that could beat it for thrills.

Turbo T

1,382 posts

254 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
Turbo T said:
Every couple of Months I have thoughts of building a mad one.


I think about it every day. Thing is, aside from cost, I wouldn't want to ruin the memories....


Yeah mine were 8+ years ago so pretty distant now. I occassionally get in my friends
thrash it within an inch of its life and remember what great cars they are

timmy30

9,325 posts

233 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
MrFlibbles said:

Lol, I was gonna mention the 3 spokes but thought better of it


they had become a source of considerable piss taking by my mates....then I saw some on a rusty old corsa being driven erratically down the North Circular in London.... that was the last staw.

By the way on the topic of building a powerful MR2, what do you lot think of this..... I was thinking of getting it and popping it into my MR2......

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dl

>> Edited by timmy30 on Friday 24th February 17:42

_Al_

5,587 posts

264 months

Friday 24th February 2006
quotequote all
It's not a Rev 2 engine. The rocker cover is completely different to mine. That means it's not a rev 1 engine either as my mates' Rev 1 turbo has the same rocker cover as mine.

Unless I'm mis-informed It's not a rev 3 engine either, the oil filter seems to be in the same place as my rev2, but I understand that the Rev 3 engine has its' filter in a different place? There's also Gazs' CT26 observation to back that up.

So what is it?