Tweaking my MR2 T-bar for more Performance

Tweaking my MR2 T-bar for more Performance

Author
Discussion

timmy30

Original Poster:

9,325 posts

234 months

Monday 6th June 2005
quotequote all
Well I just got my old T-bar back from the dead, it was in the middle of a nettle patch with 1/4 in of water in the footwell a month ago.

Rather than stuffing a 3GTSE turbo engine in I just want to tweak up the performance a bit. My first thoughts have turned to an air induction system ( any recommendations, are they worth it ) and a 'Power Module' plugged in between the car's sensor and the ECU, the ones that tell the car engine that cold air is coming in and advance the ignition timing ( again any experiences / recommendations ). Are these mods worth it? Or should I start to look at more expensive/ permanent options like a performance 'chip' or even a supercharger conversion?

Any suggestions much appreciated.

greg_D

6,542 posts

253 months

Monday 6th June 2005
quotequote all
sell it and buy a turbo, end of. Modification of the standard item would be an idiotic way forward.

Greg

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

262 months

Monday 6th June 2005
quotequote all
Cost of moddifying an NA is absurd compared to the cost of just buying a turbo... Go to any mr2 forum and they will tell you the same thing. I had my NA 6 months before I chopped it in for a turbo...

MrFlibbles

7,711 posts

290 months

Monday 6th June 2005
quotequote all
Buy a turbo.

Sponge Bob

226 posts

253 months

Monday 6th June 2005
quotequote all
Hmm - are we definately talking about a Mark 2 here... it's not been specified, and no cars in the profile!!

Although I guess either way - slap in the 3sgte and make a beast out of it

Dakkon

7,826 posts

260 months

Monday 6th June 2005
quotequote all
Listen to advice already mentioned, just sell it and buy a turbo, will be a lot cheaper overall

Tonyrec

3,984 posts

262 months

Monday 6th June 2005
quotequote all
Speak to Gazboy.....this is right up his street.

timmy30

Original Poster:

9,325 posts

234 months

Tuesday 7th June 2005
quotequote all
Okay I'm getting the consensus here a turbo would be the best solution.

Just out of interest is it that the mods mentioned just won't help much ( excluding the supercharge which I imagine would )?

It's a MK2 buy the way, NA 16v 2.0, no cat.

Was thinking about sticking the turbo engine in, Fensport do a complete unit incl ancillaries for £1500, fitting I guess another £1000, then I need to uprate the shocks and springs £800 (?)... Oh buggerit I might as well have the summer then sell it and get a turbo for next year.....

MrFlibbles

7,711 posts

290 months

Tuesday 7th June 2005
quotequote all
timmy30 said:
Okay I'm getting the consensus here a turbo would be the best solution.

Just out of interest is it that the mods mentioned just won't help much ( excluding the supercharge which I imagine would )?

It's a MK2 buy the way, NA 16v 2.0, no cat.

Was thinking about sticking the turbo engine in, Fensport do a complete unit incl ancillaries for £1500, fitting I guess another £1000, then I need to uprate the shocks and springs £800 (?)... Oh buggerit I might as well have the summer then sell it and get a turbo for next year.....


Rogue Systems will do a complete turbo conversion for £2500 (IIRC).

IMO, much better to just sell your motor and buy a nice tubby

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th June 2005
quotequote all
Just buy a turbo!
Try your damnest to get a rev 3, as they are 245 stock, as opposed to 225, and are significantly quicker in a straight line.

MrFlibbles

7,711 posts

290 months

Wednesday 8th June 2005
quotequote all
Andy Mac said:
Just buy a turbo!
Try your damnest to get a rev 3, as they are 245 stock, as opposed to 225, and are significantly quicker in a straight line.


*Ahem* but Rev 2's arent slow....

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

262 months

Wednesday 8th June 2005
quotequote all
never said they were, its just that the rev 3's are quicker. I waited 6 months for a rev 3 to come up.
Rev 2 0-60 is about 5.7, and rev 3 is 5.2... or there abouts... Both are quick,but rev that little bit quicker!

timmy30

Original Poster:

9,325 posts

234 months

Wednesday 8th June 2005
quotequote all
Hmmm what if the running costs of a turbo ( ahem insurance etc ) were a tad fierce and so I wanted to get a bit more ooommff out of my NA, would cheapish things like a KN air box do me any good at all?

Steve_Evil

10,689 posts

236 months

Wednesday 8th June 2005
quotequote all
You'll notice about as much difference as farting out the window. It will sound a little throatier but that's it. Put the money into the turbo piggy-bank.

timmy30

Original Poster:

9,325 posts

234 months

Wednesday 8th June 2005
quotequote all
Steve_Evil said:
You'll notice about as much difference as farting out the window. It will sound a little throatier but that's it. Put the money into the turbo piggy-bank.


Might just do that, the saving my pennies for a turbo, not the farting out of the window, mind you I could try that too