Opinions on this Chaps...

Opinions on this Chaps...

Author
Discussion

Pulsatingstar

1,717 posts

255 months

Friday 25th March 2005
quotequote all
Just ignore it. Its pretty common place on here that Jap cars arnt much liked.

I cant be bothered with arguements, Ill just laugh when I tear through them in 5th

Mr E

22,128 posts

266 months

Friday 25th March 2005
quotequote all
Ho ho.

If anything, the Evo is quoted at less BHP than it really has.

Mine should have 240-250bhp. I've seen stock cars put 200+ to the wheels, so guessing 260ish at the fly.

Toyota didn't want the GT-Four (255PS) stealing sales from the Jap spec Supra TT (280PS - but really quite a few more).

tuttle

3,427 posts

244 months

Friday 25th March 2005
quotequote all
Hmmmm,Jap manufs' tend to Understate power figs if anything.
I should ignore this ignorant tw*t,if I were you,he's obviously still confused about which is his ars* & which is his elbow.

trackdemon

12,318 posts

268 months

Saturday 26th March 2005
quotequote all
Quite. I've always thought it common knowledge that the japs underquoted the power outputs of most of the top-end stuff because of the silly "gentlemans agreement" to "limit" cars to 280PS (anyone know why that figure?); eg:

Skyline - 1500kg, 286bhp, 4wd trans losses but still 0-60mph sub 5.0? No way. I'd be suprised if the Supra, NSX, 300ZX, EVO, et al were below 300 "real" bhp given the relative performance of the vehicles. I wasn't *that* far behind a 360 Modena at VMAX, supposedly with another 124bhp over my car as well as the benefit of a 6 speed box.

The DJ 27

2,666 posts

260 months

Saturday 26th March 2005
quotequote all
The true power figure for a Supra is about 330bhp IIRC (I'm sure gazboy will correct me on this). Can't see a 300ZX or Skyline being much less than that.

tuttle

3,427 posts

244 months

Saturday 26th March 2005
quotequote all
Anyone wishing to do their own conversion,or just get the facts right in an argument Here's how to workit quick.
Power Conversion: ps to bhp examples:
1.0 Japanese PS = 0.98632 BHP
50 PS = 49.3 BHP
100 PS = 98.6 BHP
120 PS = 118.4 BHP
150 PS = 147.9 BHP
180 PS = 177.5 BHP
200 PS = 197.3 BHP
OR to do own DIY conversions
to convert BHP to KW multiply by 0.7457
"--------" KW to BHP "-----" by 1.3410
to convert BHP to PS "-----" by 1.0139
"--------" PS to BHP "-----" by 0.9863

vixpy1

42,676 posts

271 months

Saturday 26th March 2005
quotequote all
The UK evo's read bang on what Mitsi says. Almost to the horsepower.

Mr E

22,128 posts

266 months

Sunday 27th March 2005
quotequote all
Yup. 2 litre turbo, 250 bhp. 3 litre twin turbo, 276bhp? Don't think so. Don't think so at all.

nighthawk

1,757 posts

251 months

Sunday 27th March 2005
quotequote all
PS is a german unit of measurement, not a japanese one. I can't see where or why that guy thought japanese quoted horse power is greater than "good old english horses" some people just can't accept there is more to motoring life than a tvr.

nighthawk

1,757 posts

251 months

Monday 28th March 2005
quotequote all
Maybe so Gaz, the UK has used it since around 1990 too.

PS is an abbrievation for Pferdestärke, which roughly translates to horse strength.

daftlad

3,324 posts

248 months

Monday 28th March 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:



nighthawk said:
PS is a german unit of measurement, not a japanese one.





The Japs have been using PS for ages.



My apologies. The Japs used to quote SAE. Something I assumed they still did. I was also wrong with the relative values.
Nothing against Jap motors chaps, had lots of their motor cars and motor cycles.

>> Edited by daftlad on Monday 28th March 16:35

>> Edited by daftlad on Monday 28th March 16:41

daftlad

3,324 posts

248 months

Monday 28th March 2005
quotequote all
tuttle said:
Hmmmm,Jap manufs' tend to Understate power figs if anything.
I should ignore this ignorant tw*t,if I were you,he's obviously still confused about which is his ars* & which is his elbow.


Tut tut. Not very PC - or open.

tuttle

3,427 posts

244 months

Monday 28th March 2005
quotequote all
Naturally



tuttle

3,427 posts

244 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
No hard feelings intended DaftLad.
I feel we put up with a fair amount of Jap bashing(often ill informed,imo).I'm the first to admit that I can be a little defensive/oversensitive sometimes.

So, happy & safe driving fella
Regards
Matt-(OAP also)

M@H

11,298 posts

279 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
Anyone who thinks a standard 4.0 Chimaera is putting in the region of 230-240bhp out is being VERY optimistic anyway.

Matt.

M@H

11,298 posts

279 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
..blimey, I wouldn't have thought that just an air filter change would have made such a difference to a blown motor !!

daftlad

3,324 posts

248 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
tuttle said:
No hard feelings intended DaftLad.
I feel we put up with a fair amount of Jap bashing(often ill informed,imo).I'm the first to admit that I can be a little defensive/oversensitive sometimes.

So, happy & safe driving fella
Regards
Matt-(OAP also)


Well thank you. Very nice of you to post this.

Happy & safe driving to you too.

Mr E

22,128 posts

266 months

Tuesday 29th March 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:
turbo's love air!


You should hear the *noise* when on boost.

tuttle

3,427 posts

244 months

Wednesday 30th March 2005
quotequote all
Mr E said:


Gazboy said:
turbo's love air!




You should hear the *noise* when on boost.


Its one of those 'to live for things...'


Gazboy,I can't get the 'at wheels' chart link to work

>> Edited by tuttle on Wednesday 30th March 10:24