Electronic Boost Controllers

Electronic Boost Controllers

Author
Discussion

MrFlibbles

Original Poster:

7,706 posts

289 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
Whats all that about then?

I presume they up the boost giving more happy power, but how do they actually work?

I was under the impression that the turbo controlled the boost?

Does an FCD need to be fitted at the same time?

How much would this little lot cost (fitted) and what kind of gains could I expect?

Gaz?

p.s. I've decided I need 300bhp by the end of the summer! (Nothing to do with my mate getting his Z3 turbocharged! )

Pierscoe1

2,458 posts

267 months

Monday 3rd January 2005
quotequote all
hmmm...

all this talk has got me thinking about an MRT again...

Damn you all!!!!


edited to ad: Gaz, you've driven NA's as well haven't you? if I got a test-drive in an NA (not many dealers around with MRT's), would it be a decent indication of the handling/poise/feel of driving an MRT (obviously not talking about the power here...)

>> Edited by Pierscoe1 on Monday 3rd January 23:59

Mr E

22,047 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th January 2005
quotequote all
Are we going to have the FCD debate again.

I really thing fitting a FCD and winding the boost up is 'chip it and hope' tuning, and asking for #3 piston to detonate......

Mr E

22,047 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th January 2005
quotequote all
And you need to have fuel maps for the boost you intend to run....

Mr E

22,047 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th January 2005
quotequote all
3rd gen 3s-GTE has maps for 17.5psi.

Fuel cut is at 17.5 psi. That's why it exists.

If you're having to bypass it, where is the ECU getting it's fuelling information from?

DanBoy

4,899 posts

249 months

Tuesday 4th January 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:

Pierscoe1 said:
hmmm...

all this talk has got me thinking about an MRT again...

Damn you all!!!!


edited to ad: Gaz, you've driven NA's as well haven't you? if I got a test-drive in an NA (not many dealers around with MRT's), would it be a decent indication of the handling/poise/feel of driving an MRT (obviously not talking about the power here...)

>> Edited by Pierscoe1 on Monday 3rd January 23:59



Oooooh it was a LONG time ago (+ drunk), er, have a go with an N/a to geta feel for it if it's on shi tyres you'll hate it though. Turbo's are nt as responsive for adjustability, but the limits are too high for most road use anyway- you'll crash n die if you cock it up, the MX5 is far more forgiving.
Also, the n/a is gutless compared to most turbo's, as they dont have the midrange. If all else fails have a go in mine.


Gutless - Yes.

Sod all below 4k rpm, but after that they go quite nicely. You have to keep them on the boil, but that's part of the fun.

They are still fast cars, the NAs, despite the lack of a turbo - Overtaking is dead easy.

Mr E

22,047 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th January 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy said:

Mr E said:
3rd gen 3s-GTE has maps for 17.5psi.

Fuel cut is at 17.5 psi. That's why it exists.

If you're having to bypass it, where is the ECU getting it's fuelling information from?



Fuel cut on Rev2 MR2's is set artificialy low at 12-13psi, but the ECu reads to 17.5psi.


Ah, in that case, carry on.

tuttle

3,427 posts

243 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Gazboy,your 'A' spec(iirc) head gasket,is it much thicker than a standard gasket(i.e. 0.2mm or< )? If so,lower compression ratio is achieved & higher(not huge tho) levels of boost are safely possible(so long as the I/C can cool enough air).Lowered compr can also help to negate increased boost/detonation probs & therefore save melting holes in your pistons

Mr E

22,047 posts

265 months

Wednesday 5th January 2005
quotequote all
Mmmm. But the one thing the Deuce isn't good at is cooling. Engine is in a silly place.....



WI could well help, but I wouldn't push a 3S-GTE much past 300bhp on stock internals...