Mazda 323 turbo engine in to MX5 ???

Mazda 323 turbo engine in to MX5 ???

Author
Discussion

ajb

Original Poster:

854 posts

250 months

Friday 18th June 2004
quotequote all
I remember reading somewhere that the engine in the early MX5s is the same as the Mazda 323 1.6 turbo,
without the turbo of course.

Now the Mrs has got a 1996 1.6 MX5 and she wants a bit more poke. (insert nob gag here)

So instead of paying out for a HKS or similar turbo kit at circa to 2,000 quid.

Could the engine from a 323 turbo be transplanted?
Or could the turbo and manifold and other bits be taken off a 323 and fitted to the MX5?


Anyone with any knowledge about this?

benjc

677 posts

255 months

Saturday 19th June 2004
quotequote all
If she just wants a "bit" more poke, I would suggest a second-hand Jackson racing supercharger. There is one on e-bay at about 500 quid at the moment.

In fact there is quite a good market in second-hand lower power turbo/super units, as people get the power bug and upgrade!

The 323 engine transplant has been done, but tbh it's more hassle than it's worth. I would always prefer a path that has been well troden before, with all the ins and outs covered.

cptsideways

13,648 posts

259 months

Sunday 20th June 2004
quotequote all
Greddy turbo kits are cyrrently £950 delivered, kinda makes the whole engine route rather dudd.

Good for 250 bhp with intercooling allegedly.

benjc

677 posts

255 months

Monday 21st June 2004
quotequote all
I know of a 1.6 greddy using a tecIII running 225hp at the wheels. If you want more advice try www.tracktec.co.uk , they are very good.

jazzybee

3,056 posts

256 months

Monday 21st June 2004
quotequote all
ajb said:

Now the Mrs has got a 1996 1.6 MX5 and she wants a bit more poke.


If its a '96 UK MX-5, it will have the lower spec 90 bhp engine that bares little resemblence to the earlier 116bhp engine - more of a std. 323 engine.

If uprating the engine, I would think upgrading of the bakes to 1.8 MX-5 spec at least, as well as the clutch. Stiffer shocks and springs would be good too imho

benjc

677 posts

255 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2004
quotequote all
Well spotted Ijaz! I can't believe I missed that!

As Ijaz says, tuning options are VERY limited on the post 94 uk 1.6. You would be better off chopping it in for a 1.8. Cost to change, and all that, would probably be less than an engine transplant. Also insurers aren't too keen on 1.6s turning into 1.8s, you also have to consider re-sale if it's not a car that will be kept for a long time.