New Vanq 3 on the way

New Vanq 3 on the way

Author
Discussion

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Wednesday 1st May
quotequote all
AdamV12V said:
Grapevine says circa £400k and not mid engined…..
That's a shame, for £400k plus it needs to be mid-engineered. if not it's just another DB car with a different body again. I'm keeping Vanq2S forever more but I've moved to McLaren for my main fun because AML front engineered cars all a bit samey and slow these days. 835BHp in Mid-Engineered Vanq would get me back in the marque!

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Thursday 2nd May
quotequote all
A dealer told me yesterday that starting price will be £320k. Front engineered GT. Pretty much what we expected but not what we wanted. AML don't have the funds to sort a mid engineered super car

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Sunday 5th May
quotequote all
SJH_Vs said:
I think it’s hard enough deploying all the power in my DBSS let alone the new Vanquish, so I think you won’t be able to really tell much of a difference on real roads. Of course you can now also fit CarPlay into the DBSS to - I’m told it will be £400k for a reasonable spec so doesn’t really make sense if you already have a DBSS which you’d need another £250k to get an extra 100Nm. You can have it tuned to 800bhp anyway if you want! I think they know this so hence the ‘limited numbers’ element to set expectations.
I take the point up to certain point, the thing is that Astons are GT cars, DBSS included, they're not really capable getting turbo charged power down through the rear wheels. I can't see the Vanq3 being anything revolutionary so I can't imagine will be able to get the power down either. If moving to super car territory that's another story, a Ferrari, Lambo or McLaren manage it. Just such a shame AML didn't go ahead with the mid engine Vanq we all wanted.

I guess the thing is that to change the software on an existing engine is far more cost effective than designing a new car. Shame!

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Tuesday 7th May
quotequote all
AlexNJ89 said:
Frustrates the hell out of me on a regular basis.

My XJR with 550bhp was actually boring it was so fast. All it was going to achieve was getting me a driving ban eventually. It made the rest of the world seem so slow.

It's definitely a problem in that people seem to buy based on playing Top Trumps rather than how the car makes you feel.

What options do I have if I just want 400bhp in a premium package? The Emira was supposed to be that and I really didn't like it.

Or maybe I just need to drive something like a Ferrari 296 GTB to see what all the fuss is about, maybe I'm missing a thrill that I didn't know I wanted.

I put my money where my mouth is and bought an Alpine A110 and Vantage S. But I would love to see something like the Toyota GR86 with premium styling and interior.
I guess it all depends where you live, your age and how many limbs you have. if you're 90+ missing a leg and live in central London I can see how a (relatively speaking) slow car like an XKR would be boring. There's still plenty of (safe) fun to be had in the UK even with our over electronically policed system now.

I'm also not really sure people buy Astons for top trumps, because, as much as we all love them the reality is the same money (or even less!) in many different different brands will beat an Aston in any other "top Trump" measure. We buy Astons because we love the brand, the theatre and pleasure it brings, also maybe some patriotism. I think anyone who bought a Vanq3 because it had 835 BHP and that's the only reason, will be very disappointed because it will be out performed by many other cars, a good example being your Alpine in all likelihood!

Even a relatively slow PS electric car will get people in trouble quicker than many Astons now. Personally I think BHP in an Aston is irrelevant and I really can't see an 835BHP being quicker than an awful lot of other brands with much less BHP.

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Thursday 4th July
quotequote all
Some more details,
- limited to 214mph!
- rear end very much based on Valour
- biggest front kidney grill ever
- square quad exhausts
- 78 to be delivered in UK Q4 this year
- UK debut September

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Thursday 4th July
quotequote all
Calinours said:
Kidney grill?
big mouth? Grill at front smile

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Monday 12th August
quotequote all
I got to see the car in the flesh last week, very impressive. No photos allowed obviously. back to the grill - yes biggest ever seen on an Aston but it actually looks good I think. The rear ski slope from the valour I'm unsure of, it looks OK from some angles but not sure on a directly behind as it looks to be quite high. The quad exhausts also look great. I would say the side is vey similar to the new vantage, especially the vents behind front wheels.

All told I do think it's gorgeous but not sure the price is worth it, playing the configurator it's easy to go £400k plus with a few of the nicer options such as CF packs and paint. I'm told it will be at least October before a demonstrator is available

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Monday 12th August
quotequote all
Calinours said:
Interesting. With DB12 and new new Vantage they heavily revised the fronts and left the rears alone. With the new Vanq/DBS from what you say they have revised the rear even though there wasn't anything wrong with it. That car didn't get any criticism of its looks. I guess it goes without saying it has an ultra plush version of the new interior.

The reported weak points of the DBS SL were in the main just interior and traction.

Echoing another thread, early (2018-20) DBS SL now getting down much closer to GBP100k now look to be absolute bargains.
Agred,it's a bold step to change the back end so dramatically! Guess they fell in love the Valour back end or had some boot lids spare to used them on this smile

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Thursday 22nd August
quotequote all
[quote=cb804]A few spy shots I found online..


Not bad! Front grill much bigger though and the spy shots don't have the side grills/vents. Can't hide the Valour boot though¬

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Monday 2nd September
quotequote all
I'd guess around mid day so in time for europe or maybe later in time for US to be awake

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Tuesday 3rd September
quotequote all
I like the car, nothing much not to like except the price. With just 2 seats regardless of calling a GT its a lot of money for a 2 seat sports car. a LOT of competition out there for the same money and I can't see what the USP is, other than, it's an Aston.

I do hope it is a success though and good to see V12's still getting slotted into AMs

MMarkM

Original Poster:

1,644 posts

177 months

Thursday 12th September
quotequote all
Calinours said:
How's about a Kia comparison?? Wouldn't be the first time Miles and Marek had been 'influenced' by far east design...



Wow harsh but true!