Cygnet first video...

Cygnet first video...

Author
Discussion

XXXAngelXXX

Original Poster:

1,711 posts

234 months

Murph7355

38,669 posts

262 months

Sunday 3rd January 2010
quotequote all
Just when I thought that car couldn't get any more st...

Speedraser

1,663 posts

189 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
vomithurl

XXXAngelXXX

Original Poster:

1,711 posts

234 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
laughlaughlaugh

steve_amv8

1,906 posts

216 months

Monday 4th January 2010
quotequote all
We should be impressed that such a video was allowed in the current H&S climate! I could almost hear the "Health & Safety Champion" freaking out in the background ...

nzaston

21 posts

213 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Is it true, that only customers who already own or buy a "big" Aston Martin can buy this one? If yes, that would be acceptable for me. But if everyone can buy one, then this could cause a brand damage to Aston Martin!

nzaston

21 posts

213 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all

Murph7355

38,669 posts

262 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
nzaston said:
I agree with his sentiment. Couple of things

- I'm not sure that Ferrari's "line extensions" haven't hurt the "brand". They license some right old tat, and there's something increasingly....chavesque about the "brand" as a result. Don't get me wrong, they make some great cars (still not convinced about the California mind). But have Ferrari branded weather stations and underpants really, really added to the brand value and kept the company afloat?

I suspect it more likely that cross platform sharing (engine and gearboxes for a start, across Maser and Alfa) has been of more benefit. And they've done that job well.

- Aston seem to have cited all along that the Cygnet is down to emissions legislation (I think). But I can't help thinking they'd have been better off licensing a hybrid powertrain to address this. Or perhaps toughing it out and waiting for the EU to give concessions to low volume car makers (as I'm pretty sure will ultimately happen).

Link up with Toyota by all means, but do so to leverage their technology, not their shopping trolleys! I cannot believe Toyota would stipulate taking an iQ and slapping it round the face as part of any technology usage deal!

GR1FF1F

523 posts

240 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
At the mooted price I can only see this ever being a novelty item for pampered women and deb's popping out to Harrods. Don't really see there being a danger of the roads becoming congested with them. So I don't see this is as a kamikaze marketing manoeuvre, but equally cannot imagine the business model underlying the project - it's not going to be a money spinner.

MogulBoy

2,964 posts

229 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Murph7355 said:
I cannot believe Toyota would stipulate taking an iQ and slapping it round the face as part of any technology usage deal!
Interesting angle.... If there is to be a technology link up of some sort down the road it could very well be that someone has taken a calcualted risk that Toyota will gain more from this little exercise than AML might stand to lose to the greater good of both parties in the long term....

GlynMo

1,140 posts

255 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
There's a lot of talk on this and other threads about damage to the marque caused by the Cygnet. The real question is therefore "how many people would let the existence of the Cygnet in the AM range put them off buying one of the 'proper' AMs?" I know I wouldn't, whatever the company's reasons for producing the thing!

michael gould

5,692 posts

247 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
[quote=GR1FF1F]At the mooted price I can only see this ever being a novelty item for pampered women and deb's popping out to Harrods.

great that means my wife will want one

XXXAngelXXX

Original Poster:

1,711 posts

234 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
laughlaughlaugh

michael gould

5,692 posts

247 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
thank God Jimmy Choo or Louis Vuitton dont make cars......my wife would have a massive wadrobes full of them !

auditt

715 posts

190 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
How do i register interest for one of these?
Do i need to be a present AM Owner?

michael gould

5,692 posts

247 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
auditt said:
How do i register interest for one of these?
Do i need to be a present AM Owner?
nope you just need to be a tos..r smile

Neil1300R

5,494 posts

184 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
GR1FF1F said:
I can only see this ever being a novelty item for pampered women
Are you referring to XXXAngelXXX?
hehehehehehe


XXXAngelXXX

Original Poster:

1,711 posts

234 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
don't make my SWMBO angry she earns her own money and pays all alone for her XK wink

Neil1300R

5,494 posts

184 months

Tuesday 5th January 2010
quotequote all
Would never insult your other half..
But white trousers and loves the Cygnet....
Very girlie

smilesmilesmile

Murph7355

38,669 posts

262 months

Wednesday 6th January 2010
quotequote all
XXXAngelXXX said:
don't make my SWMBO angry she earns her own money and pays all alone for her XK wink
So even your wife doesn't want one!