Fuse 22 (re-visited!)

Fuse 22 (re-visited!)

Author
Discussion

gheimann0

Original Poster:

28 posts

152 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Good day everyone. I know that this topic has been discussed several times before (from doing a search mainly about the V8V). However, I thought I would ask for some recent opinion.

I have thought about removing Fuse 22 from my DB9 Volante, but up to now have held off, as I know in order to pass an MOT (in theory) the fuse would need to be re-fitted... I am therefore more interested in a on/off fix for this, so I can decide when I want to make lots of noise and when I don't...

I have heard that AM works have fitted a switch for some cars that come through them, but I was wondering if anyone has any experience of the remote control Fuse 22 disconnection advertised on www.Fuse22.net? This sounds like the ideal solution to me, but am reluctant to part with any money on the basis of a pretty undescriptive web page.....

Grateful for thoughts/input....

George H

14,713 posts

170 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Bamford Rose fit a switch free for PHers don't they?

Also, why would fuse 22 need to be in to pass an MOT? Is there a noise test?

yeti

10,523 posts

281 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
gheimann0 said:
as I know in order to pass an MOT (in theory) the fuse would need to be re-fitted...
Nonsense I'm afraid. What do you think you'd fail? Emissions? That's all they test! It's fine in or out for the MOT.

It was designed for drive by noise regulations for the factory to pass. No other reason.

BR will fit one for free in conjuction with other work I believe (i.e. service/upgrades)

DB9 Ian P

2,749 posts

161 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
I have a DB9 Volante which has fuse 22 removed and has just gone through its first MOT with out any problem.

yeti

10,523 posts

281 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
And it really isn't >that< loud when removed anyway.

People seem to think it's going to sound like the end of days when you take it out, it just sounds like you'd expect rather than weirdly quiet.

George H

14,713 posts

170 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
yeti said:
And it really isn't >that< loud when removed anyway.
Quite quiet actually compared to my mates Ducati 996 with Termagoni pipes, and that passed it's MOT despite being absolutely deafening.

Jockman

17,988 posts

166 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
I am booked in for an MOT next month, and I don't have F22 in - dealer never mentioned it would be a problem smile

michael gould

5,692 posts

247 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Jockman said:
I am booked in for an MOT next month, and I don't have F22 in - dealer never mentioned it would be a problem smile
boring boring boring ....this subject has been done to death.... shoot

George H

14,713 posts

170 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Jockman said:
I am booked in for an MOT next month
What's that then, like a post 50th health check? biggrin

toofastforme

119 posts

176 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
gheimann0 said:
Good day everyone. I know that this topic has been discussed several times before (from doing a search mainly about the V8V). However, I thought I would ask for some recent opinion.

I have thought about removing Fuse 22 from my DB9 Volante, but up to now have held off, as I know in order to pass an MOT (in theory) the fuse would need to be re-fitted... I am therefore more interested in a on/off fix for this, so I can decide when I want to make lots of noise and when I don't...

I have heard that AM works have fitted a switch for some cars that come through them, but I was wondering if anyone has any experience of the remote control Fuse 22 disconnection advertised on www.Fuse22.net? This sounds like the ideal solution to me, but am reluctant to part with any money on the basis of a pretty undescriptive web page.....

Grateful for thoughts/input....
I have the remote switch installed and it works fine. In the 4.3 V8V I've noticed a slight drop in low-down torque when fuse22 is "disengaged" so I prefer to have the option of switching it at will. One tip - you need to find a good earth when fitting the remote switch. It's easy on the coupe, but there's no convenient bolt nearby on the roadster.


toofastforme

119 posts

176 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
toofastforme said:
gheimann0 said:
Good day everyone. I know that this topic has been discussed several times before (from doing a search mainly about the V8V). However, I thought I would ask for some recent opinion.

I have thought about removing Fuse 22 from my DB9 Volante, but up to now have held off, as I know in order to pass an MOT (in theory) the fuse would need to be re-fitted... I am therefore more interested in a on/off fix for this, so I can decide when I want to make lots of noise and when I don't...

I have heard that AM works have fitted a switch for some cars that come through them, but I was wondering if anyone has any experience of the remote control Fuse 22 disconnection advertised on www.Fuse22.net? This sounds like the ideal solution to me, but am reluctant to part with any money on the basis of a pretty undescriptive web page.....

Grateful for thoughts/input....
I have the remote switch installed and it works fine. In the 4.3 V8V I've noticed a slight drop in low-down torque when fuse22 is "disengaged" so I prefer to have the option of switching it at will. One tip - you need to find a good earth when fitting the remote switch. It's easy on the coupe, but there's no convenient bolt nearby on the roadster.
... and by the way, I didn't pay £99 for mine !!!! You can get them on ebay for less than half of that.

Jockman

17,988 posts

166 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
What's that then, like a post 50th health check? biggrin
yikes

That's 2 days on the trot you've blind-sided me Georgio.

You can get your own costco oil for that smile

BTW Mr G, if a new member needs a bit of info on a topic that has been discussed previously, would it not be the gentlemanly approach to at least point him in the right direction wink

julian1963

33 posts

156 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Fully agree with Jockman!
We're all supposed to be gentlemen here and we always remember the pride of the first days with the Aston and the fear to do anything wrong.
Confidence take some time to come (and pride remains!)

I confirm there is no problem to take the fuse out and that there are some cheap alternatives for fitting a switch or a even a remote.
I personnaly opted for a self made switch that remains in the battery compartment linked to the fuse holder by wire.
I can switch on/off in seconds even when seated and don't have to cope with one more remote (21th century men are surrouded by so many remote controls). No holes, no visible wires, no harsch...
Anyway I must admit that I even took the rear parcel shelf out to get more noise inside! I barely switched the fuse on since then!
The 4.7 V8V is loud, just fantastically and elegantly loud.
A gentleman's car!

gheimann0

Original Poster:

28 posts

152 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Thanks all for the responses.... and thanks Jockman for standing up for a newbie....(to this forum anayway). Just for Mr G to understand, I did say "I know this has been discussed several time before" but I wondered if there was any more recent opinion above and beyond previous discussions.....!! Never did like relying to much on historical info!

BTW, whilst a decibel test is not a "standard" part of the MOT, the examiner can decide to do one if he believes your exhaust is too noisy. Also a police officer can demand a test and issue a vehicle retification requirement if he stops you for excessive noise, it is also possible to do a roadside test of decibel noise (although exceptionally rare). The law also says that an exhaust system must not be altered to make it louder than standard...the question is, is removing fuse 22 modifying the exhaust system? Ironically, you can fit a louder exhaust system to your car (AKA spotty teen in a beat up pug with a dustbin exhaust fitted) as long as the actual system itself isn't modified.. Whoever said the law made sense....

Believe me, I should know.....

Jockman

17,988 posts

166 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Giles - I have copied a section from Mike's Bamford Rose sticky above and it reads thus...

Fuse 22:

Loss of low speed torque when fuse 22 is removed - there is None - exhaust bypass valves open Vs closed returns the same torque output. On a 4.7L 10% torque loss is approx. 50Nm, the report of this sort of loss by removal of fuse 22 is quite outrageous.

The bypass valves are present for one reason, and one reason ONLY - so the vehicle can pass noise drive-by test. The car is tested on a controlled surface which is in controlled surroundings making noise recording very accurate. The total noise the car produces is measured at a start gate, around 30MPH in third gear, the car then accelerates at full throttle to around 55MPH where the test terminates at the end gate. The engine speed and load (volumetric efficiency) conditions the car is operated under during this test defines how the exhaust bypass valves are controlled by the EMS. The exhaust bypass valves only purpose is to effectively cheat the test and gain a noise drive-by test pass for an exhaust system that would otherwise fail, being too loud.

Exhaust back pressure at the conditions where the bypass valves operate is so low as to be immeasurable, this means that open or closed the bypass valves will have no consequence over torque output. However, that statement would be wrong if the bypass valves were closed after anything above around 4000 rpm full throttle, where torque output would be reduced.

Removing fuse 22 electronically inhibits operation of the vacuum pump which controls the valves. The default position of the valves is 'open', so by disabling the system the valves simply sit in their default position. Prolonged usage with the valves at default open position is highly unlikely to seize or stick the valves should they be operated at some point in the future. I have also read elsewhere owners have been advised not to remove fuse 22 as they have been told it creates fault codes which disrupt the diagnostic system, or somehow creates other (electronic / mechanical) faults - Rubbish... All that happens is a PCode is simply registered within the modules history to state electronic control of the valves was not possible, this code does not illuminate the yellow 'check engine' light on the dash.

In summary - remove the fuse and enjoy the soundtrack.....!!!

...if you could possibly translate it into Gaelic for me I would be most grateful smile

Lunablack

3,494 posts

168 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
michael gould said:
boring boring boring ....this subject has been done to death.... shoot
Much like your list thenbiggrin

George H

14,713 posts

170 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Jockman said:
...if you could possibly translate it into Gaelic for me I would be most grateful smile
Fuse 22: loss ay law speed torque when fuse 22 is removed - thaur is nane - exhaoost bypass valves open vs closed returns th' sam torque ootput. oan a fuir.7l 10% torque loss is approx. 50nm, th' report ay thes sort ay loss by removal ay fuse 22 is quite ootrageoos. the bypass valves ur present fur a body reason, an' a body reason only - sae th' vehicle can pass stooshie drive-by test. th' motur is tested oan a controlled surface which is in controlled surroondings makin' stooshie recordin' huir uv a accurate. th' total stooshie th' motur produces is measured at a start gate, aroond 30mph in third gear, th' motur 'en accelerates at foo throttle tae aroond 55mph whaur th' test terminates at th' end gate. th' engine speed an' load (volumetric efficiency) conditions th' motur is operated under durin' thes test defines hoo th' exhaoost bypass valves ur controlled by th' ems. th' exhaoost bypass valves only purpose is tae effectively cheat th' test an' gain a stooshie drive-by test pass fur an exhaoost system 'at woods otherwise fail, bein' tay lood. exhaoost back pressure at th' conditions whaur th' bypass valves operate is sae law as tae be immeasurable, thes means 'at open ur closed th' bypass valves will hae nae consequence ower torque ootput. however, 'at statement woods be wrang if th' bypass valves waur closed efter anythin' abune aroond 4000 rpm foo throttle, whaur torque ootput woods be reduced. removin' fuse 22 electronically inhibits operation ay th' vacuum pump which controls th' valves. th' default position ay th' valves is 'open', sae by disablin' th' system th' valves simply sit in their default position. prolonged usage wi' th' valves at default open position is highly jobbie tae seize ur stick th' valves shoods they be operated at some point in th' future. Ah hae also reid elsewhaur owners hae bin advised nae tae remove fuse 22 as they hae bin tauld it creates faut codes which disrupt th' diagnostic system, ur somehaw creates other (electronic / mechanical) faults - naf... aw 'at happens is a pcode is simply registered within th' modules history tae state electronic control ay th' valves wisnae possible, thes code disnae illuminate th' yella' 'check engine' lecht oan th' dash. in summary - remove th' fuse an' enjoy th' soondtrack.....!!!

http://www.whoohoo.co.uk/scottish-translator.asp

michael gould

5,692 posts

247 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Lunablack said:
michael gould said:
boring boring boring ....this subject has been done to death.... shoot
Much like your list thenbiggrin
yep.....your right there......but its not my list, its jockmans

Jockman

17,988 posts

166 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
michael gould said:
yep.....your right there......but its not my list, its jockmans
I just knew that somewhere along the way......it would be my fault biggrin

Georgeous H, please stop being facitious wink

michael gould

5,692 posts

247 months

Wednesday 22nd February 2012
quotequote all
Jockman said:
michael gould said:
yep.....your right there......but its not my list, its jockmans
I just knew that somewhere along the way......it would be my fault biggrin

Georgeous H, please stop being facitious wink
I think Georgeous is jolly funny