Getting an itch to change the Vanquish .... But what to?

Getting an itch to change the Vanquish .... But what to?

Author
Discussion

S1M VP

Original Poster:

949 posts

240 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
Hi guys, after some advice .... Posted similar topic in other forums to get other opinions too on other cars

i changed my 360 for a Vanquish last Nov, so the 3 of us can all use it, but now my mrs and 5 yr old daughter prefer going in the RRS so whilst it's nice for the 3 of us to fit ... It's not 100% essential.

Mines an earlier 53' Vanquish (I prefer to wait until they've nearly bottomed out to avoid huge depreciation, then buy) and whilst it is imo a great looking and awesome sounding car, it does feel a little dated + Im tired of seeing gearbox fault warning on dash for 2-3 seconds when I first start the car (a common niggle and Rick of DMS explained its just the sensor measuring before hydraulic pressure has sorted itself out).
It's an epic car, but if I'm starting to find gripes ... It usually means the itch to change is intensifying.

Options narrowed down to a DBS, a 612, or a Murcielago (c.£90k) ... Any thoughts appreciated!

Thanks, Paul

P14SMM

229 posts

161 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
DBS!!

I don't like tha Lamborghini ANSI coming from a true Ferrari fan te 612 is ugly!

I've had a DBS for a few months now and must say its awesome!

Better inside and feels more special than any 90k Ferrari , I even looked at stretching the budget to a California but the DBS just feels special.

Good look but your very luck to have this sor t of problem!
:-)

George H

14,713 posts

170 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
What about a Vanquish S? Or maybe a V12V.

I wouldn't go for the 612 if you said back seats aren't essential. One of the ugliest Ferraris made, although it seems they are currently trying to top it with the current range. Have you looked at 599's? Earlier ones might just creep within budget.

I love the original Murcielago, looks much nicer than the later tarted up versions. No idea what they're like to live with though.

Mako V12V

3,135 posts

220 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
V12V is the only solution! wink

mikey k

13,014 posts

222 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
DBS or V12V

rjn21

289 posts

170 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
599 is fabulous. However, sat nav is an in radio job and rubbish - worse than AML so it really is saying something. HiFi is rubbish. Mirrors are not foldable electrically, which given the size of it may be be an issue. No cruise control.
I use my V12V as a daily driver and had the decision of either of a new 599 or new V12V. Discounts were available on both, although you mentioned 2nd hand. It came down to the better package the V12V presented for my personal usage habits. 599 was a better pure driving car, but the V12V provided a better compromise. V12V also sounds better.
DBS - I had a DB9 before and considered it to be just to the same as I had before, whereas V12V was a different direction.
Drive them all, make your own decision - only you know what will work for you! Personally I would not go near Vanquish - too many horror stories (whether or not to) of gearbox and clutch failures.

Jockman

17,988 posts

166 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
S1M VP said:
...I prefer to wait until they've nearly bottomed out to avoid huge depreciation, then buy...
Paul - You may well have to rethink your strategy if you are even considering a DBS (or indeed a V12V). Neither of these cars are anywhere near the bottom of their depreciation curves and you will be paying an entry level - used - in the Mid-80s.

Good luck with your decision smile

S1M VP

Original Poster:

949 posts

240 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
Jockman said:
Paul - You may well have to rethink your strategy if you are even considering a DBS (or indeed a V12V). Neither of these cars are anywhere near the bottom of their depreciation curves and you will be paying an entry level - used - in the Mid-80s.

Good luck with your decision smile
Hi Jockman ... "Bottomed out" is maybe a bit bold and didn't meant quite so literally ... In my mind an £85-95k (yes entry agreed) car has already lost a lot from £160-165k new.

My thinking is a 3yr old £90k DBS over the next 12 months and 5k miles per annum ... I guess would start to lose less, as time goes by, so in 2 yrs may still be worth around £60-65k then towards bottom of curve would lose a little less each year to around £50k base, maybe even down to £45k eventually but over a good few years.

All cars will lose money save the very rare ... I just don't like the huge depreciation hits that I'd invariably face with a much newer/new car, and having been stung by a balloon scheme a few yrs ago, I prefer to buy something without finance that someone else took the big hit on for that 'new car feeling' that isn't essential for me ... that was really my point.

May nip up to Stratstone Derby next week, they have a nice looking black DBS for £90k with quite low miles.
Anyone's old car on here?

S1M VP

Original Poster:

949 posts

240 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
Thanks for input all.

Have looked at the 599 ... And maybe stretching to a California, but I 'm happy to wait a year or two first.

A £50k Vanquish to a £90k car is a jump up anyway ... Which the Mrs need not know about ... That extension she keeps harping on about or a new toy, is no contest, she can sit on my lap when we have the family over.

Back seats would be useful, and the more sensible option, even better if I can fit the golf clubs and trolley in the back.
The V12V is nice, but not for me ... The only car that would really steer me away from a 2+2 would be the Murcielago really ... Dream car for me or a 599 if/when they fall a bit more.

Did think about a 911t or GT2, or a Grantourismo, or even a Nissan GTR, but had a 911 and fancy something a bit wilder/quicker than the Maserati and the GTR was only considered for how quick it is, not because I like the shape and as good as they are, don't have the same class as the others.

And yes ... It's a nice problem to have and do consider it a privilege .... But work hard and only live once (as I'm sure most on here do).

Jockman

17,988 posts

166 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
S1M VP said:
My thinking is a 3yr old £90k DBS over the next 12 months and 5k miles per annum ... I guess would start to lose less, as time goes by, so in 2 yrs may still be worth around £60-65k then towards bottom of curve would lose a little less each year to around £50k base, maybe even down to £45k eventually but over a good few years.

All cars will lose money save the very rare ... I just don't like the huge depreciation hits that I'd invariably face with a much newer/new car, and having been stung by a balloon scheme a few yrs ago, I prefer to buy something without finance that someone else took the big hit on for that 'new car feeling' that isn't essential for me ... that was really my point.
Your figures are pretty sound Paul - reducing balance depreciation always shows the highest blip initially, though for some reason we always seem to view it in a straight line when talking retrospectively ??

If the rear seats are really important, don't discount the Rapide or Virage. Those cars will soon be in your bracket along with a wonderful original warranty, something I cannot guarantee you will get with the DBS smile

S1M VP

Original Poster:

949 posts

240 months

Saturday 3rd December 2011
quotequote all
Thanks for input all.

Have looked at the 599 ... And maybe stretching to a California, but I 'm happy to wait a year or two first.

A £50k Vanquish to a £90k car is a jump up anyway ... Which the Mrs need not know about ... That extension she keeps harping on about or a new toy, is no contest, she can sit on my lap when we have the family over.

Back seats would be useful, and the more sensible option, even better if I can fit the golf clubs and trolley in the back.
The V12V is nice, but not for me ... The only car that would really steer me away from a 2+2 would be the Murcielago really ... Dream car for me or a 599 if/when they fall a bit more.

Did think about a 911t or GT2, or a Grantourismo, or even a Nissan GTR, but had a 911 and fancy something a bit wilder/quicker than the Maserati and the GTR was only considered for how quick it is, not because I like the shape and as good as they are, don't have the same class as the others.

And yes ... It's a nice problem to have and do consider it a privilege .... But work hard and only live once (as I'm sure most on here do).

roughrider

978 posts

192 months

Tuesday 6th December 2011
quotequote all
Try the Rapide, its a very surprising sports car, and your daughter can watch a DVD, or play SuperMario on Playstation, while you're enjoying your favourite road........

Armen

252 posts

154 months

Friday 9th December 2011
quotequote all
VANQUISH S !

The clutch of the Vanquish S is much stronger. The car feels tighter and the steering is 20% more direct.
I think it is the best you can chose. The last handmade Aston Martin, made in Newport-Pagnell.
The best would be a Vanquish S from 2007, the last year of production. From 2006, the Vanquish S got a new dashboard.
The Vanquish is such an epic car, you know it. But I promise you, the S really worths it.
The brakes are also better, the handling too. Just check that the clutch sensor has been changed. If yes, you won't have any problem with the clutch.
I guess it is the right moment to buy a Vanquish S, but also a Vanquish. No doubt that it will be harder and harder to find one of these in perfect condition.
No doubt neither that prices will increase... Just My 2 Cents.

PS : the DBS is a nice car but does not feel as strong as the Vanquish S...