Sagaris latest after factory visit

Sagaris latest after factory visit

Author
Discussion

the pits

Original Poster:

4,289 posts

246 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2004
quotequote all
Visited factory today to pick up my courtesy Tamora, kindly loaned to me while I wait for the Sagaris.

I saw 3 sagaris bodies having bits fitted to them. One was black and belongs to Nikolai Smollenski. That had an engine with a red cam cover which I guess is what the tuscan s engines will have unless it's a one off just for him. Maybe his is getting even more power. The other bodies were chameleon green and solid red.

The t350 fuel filler seems to have gone on all of them in favour of a motorbike style metal cap. A slight shame in my opinion. What is potentially a tragic change is that all the gashes over the wheel arches appear to be filled in. I'm desperately hoping they were just yet to be cut out but none of the cars had the trade mark axe cuts. The marks are still there but there are no holes in the body work, ie they are all dummy. The guy at the factory said they were now like that but I'm hoping he's got it wrong. The whole point of the car for me was that it was a sophisticated aerodynamic package compared to the t350. ie no pressure build up under the wheel arches a la closed wheel racing cars. As it is it's just a widetrack t350 with a 4.0 engine. Very disappointing and I'm not sure I wouldn't rather have a t350 RR with a 4.0 stuffed in it. It would be just as quick but more subtle. Please Nick, don't take the mick! There better be a damn good reason for filling them in or I'll have to get the hack saw out myself!

Smollenski's car was also hide trimmed across the dashboard so it looks like the interior body colour bits have gone too. As has the scoop under the rear number plate area although I think this improves the back.

fjt9

6 posts

238 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2004
quotequote all
did you manage to take any pictures? they better put those holes in the wheel arches, or else will be very

GreenV8S

30,426 posts

290 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2004
quotequote all
fjt9 said:

they better put those holes in the wheel arches, or else


Why? They didn't have any function that I could see. (There was a liner stopping them from pulling air out of the wheel arch.) Same goes for the lump at the back where an extractor would normally go, superficially it looked like an extractor but the angles were unworkable. Ditto for the tortuous air intake for the main cooling rad, recipe for cooling problems as far as I could see, and if I remember correctly the vents were pulling air from the front of the rad so they would reduce cooling rather than increase it. It was all very strange when you looked into the details.

Despite the hype I reckon the whole thing was styled rather than designed. If you like it for its styling fair enough, I just don't buy the argument that it looks that way for aerodynamic reasons.

fjt9

103 posts

239 months

Wednesday 22nd December 2004
quotequote all
why?

i liked them for the presence they gave the car

washy

950 posts

282 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
This doesn't sound good. The only way I could cope with the crazy styling was the belief that it would be a benefit on track days. Had a lengthy discussion about the aerodynamics at the motor show etc... if the car is going to be wide T350 with lumps out of it I think I'd go for the T350RR instead.

chris watton

22,478 posts

266 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
If all the new chassis' of our cars are the more or less the same, why can't we do what Smart do, and change the body to suite our mood, Tusc/Tam/350, lift off, slip on!!!! lol








I wasn't serious,,,,,,,,, btw!

hobo

5,843 posts

252 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
I got a 'brochure' for the Sagaris a couple of weeks ago, and it definatley had the slits over the wheel arches.

Surely they cannot change it without informing the people who have ordered one, having been sent 'final' details through previously.

Surely, they could find themselves with a huge amount of cancelled orders ?

stevenleith

230 posts

275 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Is it me or is this just heading down the route of an expensive T350 or RR?!

Whats the price difference between a sagaris and a T350RR with 4.0?

hobo

5,843 posts

252 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
There are no confirmations of ANY changes as yet, and therefore until told otherwise I personally would/will assume there has been no changes.

All orders that have been placed are based upon the most recent car shown, i.e, with all slits, etc, and therefore cannot believe TVR would just change the car without informing the would-be owners.

What would happen if you had one on order, were informed it was ready to collect, and upon your arrival found it to be a T350 with a bodykit & a bigger engine ? I for one would not accept it.

WhirlingDERVish

86 posts

240 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
The concensus of opinion seems to be that a Sagaris without slits is not what we ordered. I must admit that recently I've been trying to justify to myself the £12,000 difference in price between the Sagaris and T350 and if it now turns out that the dramatic styling has been ditched in favour of cosmetic filled-in slits then that really will tip the balance against the Sagaris. It might be a second faster to 60 but that isn't worth 12 grand in my book!

It also seems to me that the fact that the gashes were filled in does indicate that they weren't simply waiting to be cut out - after all, presumably the spaces for the headlights weren't also filled in - in other words, any bits that were going to be holes were already holes at that point in production?

If it's true, it's a real shame.

stevenleith

230 posts

275 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Can an "orderee" of the Sagaris not email/ring the factory to confirm?

Surely you guys are due some peace of mind while TVR hold your deposit for however many more months.....

blueyes

4,799 posts

258 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
hobo said:
What would happen if you had one on order, were informed it was ready to collect, and upon your arrival found it to be a T350 with a bodykit & a bigger engine ? I for one would not accept it.


I ordered this at one motorshow:

www.ballisticbanana.co.uk./The%20TVR%20Griffith/Speed%206.jpg

18 months later one of these was delivered:

www.sleepy-fish.com/images/Tuscan/1.jpg


I wasn't too unhappy.

hobo

5,843 posts

252 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
And so you would/should be.

However, the motorshow Sagaris was always going to change, and everyone knew this.

However, the Sagaris brochure has been printed & sent out, and therefore I personally think that what is shown in this should be what you are getting.

>> Edited by hobo on Thursday 23 December 11:52

stevenleith

230 posts

275 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Can you post scans of the Sagaris brochure? Is it available on the TVR www for download?.......off i go>....

hobo

5,843 posts

252 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Haven't got it with me at the moment.

stevenleith

230 posts

275 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
stevenleith said:
Is it available on the TVR www for download?.......off i go>....


That'll be a no.....can't believe some of the crap still on that website about some of the cars!

washy

950 posts

282 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Disagree hobo - I was told what you see is what you get, excluding the 6 pot front calipers and 19 inch rims that is. Much fuss was made about aerodynamics and the effect on cornering at speed etc... I'm not even going to start on what else was suggested prior to NS take over.

the pits

Original Poster:

4,289 posts

246 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
Here's hoping that they just hadn't got round to cutting the holes out yet. The trouble is all the lights were in place and they'd even put a bit of steel mesh in the holes under the head lights.
Smollenski's in for a shock if he thinks we won't mind or that it doesn't make much difference. I for one will try and order something else. It could be going all a bit XJ220! Really didn't mean to scare monger and again I hope I've got it horribly wrong, not TVR, but if I'm right then maybe we can apply pressure to have it changed, in the nick of time.

The Surveyor

7,581 posts

243 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
If the cars had wheelarch liners, then there would be no aerodynamic benifit anyway.

If the slits were open, would you not get muddy water / dirt / grit being thrown up, and onto the screen when its being driven?

They put mudgards on for a reason don't they.....

washy

950 posts

282 months

Thursday 23rd December 2004
quotequote all
If the Sagaris concept, as it was sold to me 12 months ago, gets watered down, as is being suggested, then it's GT2 time for me I think. Can't see any other direction for me in TVR following a 437bhp Cerb.