BHP increase

Author
Discussion

Greeny_918

Original Poster:

38 posts

61 months

Friday 24th January 2020
quotequote all
Time to pick your brains again.

What would be the difference in getting the Walkinshaw over the radiator air intake and remap with just a cat back Wortec, compared to what I would see from getting the headers, cats and xpipe done first?

It's about 1100 for Walkinshaw bits and 1800 for the AAS treatment.

Does the extra money on the exhaust justify the return in performance?

vxr2010

2,594 posts

165 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
if it’s a monaro you have ? do the diff first , put a 3.9 in , a cold air intake and a map will give you more bhp but will you actually notice it , the diff you will , vxr8 the exhaust i think is 8 ? bhp more , cold air intake and a remap on a vxr8 is quite a lot of ££ for not a load of extra grunt , theres a you tube clip i think it gave it an extra 45 ish or so increase in bhp , a 30 bhp increase is not that noticeable apparently

mfp4073

1,976 posts

180 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Greeny_918 said:
Time to pick your brains again.

What would be the difference in getting the Walkinshaw over the radiator air intake and remap with just a cat back Wortec, compared to what I would see from getting the headers, cats and xpipe done first?

It's about 1100 for Walkinshaw bits and 1800 for the AAS treatment.

Does the extra money on the exhaust justify the return in performance?
If you get the headers, cats and X pipe done first, you won't see much of an increase in power. The reason being the factory cat back and the standard air intake are restrictive.
Basically start withe the intake first then a cat back followed by the headers. Obviously it's better if you do at least the exhaust in one go, but cost is the overriding factor for most.
Think of it as getting more air into the engine, and more burnt gases going out the exhaust with the least amount of restrictions as possible.
Leave the remap until last, but make sure you're not going to to do anything else to the engine anytime soon otherwise another remap will be required.
One thing I did learn earlier on is when you look at individual components the manufacturer claims all kinds of power and torque inceases. Well in reality they don't do much on their own, they will only show decent gains in conjunction with other performance parts fitted as an overall package.
Your prices seem a bit off to me, are you sure you are getting like for like comparisons. It's hard to believe that Walkinshaw's are cheaper than AAS.
That is how I modified my Monaro over the years and it's worked out fine for me.

John

Olas

911 posts

63 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Temperature and density are Two sides of the same coin - that should be a big indicator.

Optimise the hardware and have it calibrated to suit, no different to the last 100 years of
Fiddling with ICEs.

vxr2010

2,594 posts

165 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
As above , it’s a collection of mods that work the best but it’s often a lot of £££ , the monaro focus pack , modified air box k and n filter , that says to me not a lot of benefit doing an otr on a monaro? , bigger intake pipe , sports cat headers exhaust and a remap , it cost 4000£ and gave 100 bhp extra which is a fair lump of bhp , my ls1 ute got mapped , it was difficult to notice much of a difference , diff in my monaro a big improvement

fred bloggs

1,342 posts

206 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
Id say you want full exhaust, headers, intake and cam, for best results, before a map.

Or just Just a map on its own for decent bang for buck. All these different air filters do nothing a nice panel filter wont.

stevieturbo

17,459 posts

253 months

vxr2010

2,594 posts

165 months

stevieturbo

17,459 posts

253 months

Saturday 25th January 2020
quotequote all
vxr2010 said:
haha, Andre's early days in video !

Good bunch of tests

Triumph Trollomite

5,048 posts

87 months

Sunday 26th January 2020
quotequote all
Best bhp for £ is raised commanded fuel at WOT by 1.

OTR is money if you have it to burn

Relocate the air intake temp sensor and go 3.7 diff as 3.9 is too much for regular road use

vxr2010

2,594 posts

165 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
A lot of posting going on here and not sure from poster , if it’s a monaro or r8 , the 3.9 works well on a cv8 due to much longer gearing , fitted to mine and mpg is still very good

Triumph Trollomite

5,048 posts

87 months

Monday 27th January 2020
quotequote all
on a original cv8 the 3.9 works, on the later ratio boxes the 3.7

Greeny_918

Original Poster:

38 posts

61 months

Wednesday 29th January 2020
quotequote all
mfp4073 said:
If you get the headers, cats and X pipe done first, you won't see much of an increase in power. The reason being the factory cat back and the standard air intake are restrictive.
Basically start withe the intake first then a cat back followed by the headers. Obviously it's better if you do at least the exhaust in one go, but cost is the overriding factor for most.
Think of it as getting more air into the engine, and more burnt gases going out the exhaust with the least amount of restrictions as possible.
Leave the remap until last, but make sure you're not going to to do anything else to the engine anytime soon otherwise another remap will be required.
One thing I did learn earlier on is when you look at individual components the manufacturer claims all kinds of power and torque inceases. Well in reality they don't do much on their own, they will only show decent gains in conjunction with other performance parts fitted as an overall package.
Your prices seem a bit off to me, are you sure you are getting like for like comparisons. It's hard to believe that Walkinshaw's are cheaper than AAS.
That is how I modified my Monaro over the years and it's worked out fine for me.

John
The price quotes were for the 2 different jobs, AAS for the exhaust as I've already got cat back. The Walkinshaw was for intake and remap

Greeny_918

Original Poster:

38 posts

61 months

Wednesday 29th January 2020
quotequote all
vxr2010 said:
A lot of posting going on here and not sure from poster , if it’s a monaro or r8 , the 3.9 works well on a cv8 due to much longer gearing , fitted to mine and mpg is still very good
It's a VXR8

Olas

911 posts

63 months

Wednesday 29th January 2020
quotequote all
There is no such thing as BHP, it is only a mathematical function of torque.

What you really want is to be able to apply more torque to the wheel per unit of time.

PH’ers should know this! I came to this forum hoping for a better quality of post than BarryBoys or Facebook, and some of it is, but a lot of it is equally uninformed dross that someone heard off their mate down the pub.

Alas!

Triumph Trollomite

5,048 posts

87 months

Wednesday 29th January 2020
quotequote all
Olas said:
There is no such thing as BHP, it is only a mathematical function of torque.

What you really want is to be able to apply more torque to the wheel per unit of time.

PH’ers should know this! I came to this forum hoping for a better quality of post than BarryBoys or Facebook, and some of it is, but a lot of it is equally uninformed dross that someone heard off their mate down the pub.

Alas!
Hi Richard:wave: