Diesels odd, petrols even. Why?
Discussion
following on from torque vs. bhp...
Does anyone know why petrol engines are almost all even numbers in capacity (1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 etc.) when diesel engines are usually odd (1.5, 1.7, 1.9, 2.1 etc)?
it seems that simplifying engine designations through capacity would be a rather weak reason for dictating something as important as engine capacity, which is the only reason i can think of..
Does anyone know why petrol engines are almost all even numbers in capacity (1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 etc.) when diesel engines are usually odd (1.5, 1.7, 1.9, 2.1 etc)?
it seems that simplifying engine designations through capacity would be a rather weak reason for dictating something as important as engine capacity, which is the only reason i can think of..
guys, due to computer error (!) this thread also exists here:
www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=23&t=34918
sorry
the lad
>> Edited by mikeylad on Tuesday 8th April 16:33
www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=23&t=34918
sorry
the lad
>> Edited by mikeylad on Tuesday 8th April 16:33
following on from torque vs. bhp...
Does anyone know why petrol engines are almost all even numbers in capacity (1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0 etc.) when diesel engines are usually odd (1.5, 1.7, 1.9, 2.1 etc)?
it seems that simplifying engine designations through capacity would be a rather weak reason for dictating something as important as engine capacity, which is the only reason i can think of..
It's random - trust me.
Gassing Station | Engines & Drivetrain | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff