V8 Porous Block fix?

Author
Discussion

shentodj

Original Poster:

401 posts

233 months

Friday 9th September 2005
quotequote all
Anyone know if there are any fixes (sealants I can pour into the coolant etc) to save the 4.6 V8 my '98 Range Rover?

ZR1cliff

17,999 posts

254 months

Friday 9th September 2005
quotequote all
Why,how do they go pourous.

boosted ls1

21,198 posts

265 months

Friday 9th September 2005
quotequote all
ZR1cliff said:
Why,how do they go pourous.


Think the liners leak between the liner and water jacket. Or rather the jacket leaks because it's thin and porous. Don't think there is a fix as such ,maybe try radweld but I doubt it will help.

Sure it's porous and not a head gasket?

Boosted

Trooper2

6,676 posts

236 months

Friday 9th September 2005
quotequote all
I don't think there is one, except replacement.


ZR1cliff said:
Why,how do they go pourous.


Also from casting voids, air bubbles in the casting.

Doesn't happen with injection molding, so not usually a problem with aluminium blocks and heads.

>> Edited by Trooper2 on Friday 9th September 18:15

ajmac

95 posts

263 months

Friday 9th September 2005
quotequote all
The Aluminium cracks near the top of the bore. It's a simple as that!

I did quite a lot of research and spoke to some of the Engineers on the Land-Rover team in the 90's.

About an inch below the surface of the block the aluminium surrounding the liner is at it's thinnest, cores always have a degree of float in the mould during casting and depending on how it sits we get varying thickness of wall. The issue is a classic engineering build up of tolerance, each dimension has an associated tolerance and depending where you datum points are for the machining, you can end up breaking through into the water jacket etc, nasty :-(

Anyway, the 3.5 had a smaller bore (3.5" thus the build of tolerance on the wall thickness surrounding the liners didn't weaken the block, however when the bore was increased to 3.7" it became possible of the wall thickness to reach dangerously thin proportions! Thus the stress in the aluminium surrounding the iron liners became great enough to crack the wall and allow water to be pulled into the space between the liner and the block, and then up over the top of the liner and into the cylinder.

Hence the use of 'top hat' or flanged liners as these seat under the head gasket thus if the wall cracks behind the liner it doesn't matter as the back of the liner doesn't have a viable route into the cylinder!

Put some rad weld in it and see how you go, it's broken anyway.

Alastair

boosted ls1

21,198 posts

265 months

Friday 9th September 2005
quotequote all
I agree with that and would add that siamesing the bores probably helped make them more stable. I also heard that the crossbolted engines are running leaner so there could have been expansion issues that hadn't been realised at the time that these blocks were produced.

Boosted

andys2

869 posts

263 months

Saturday 10th September 2005
quotequote all
Mine ( 3.9 V8 ) was using a lot of water so I thought I'd try a block sealer. I used this stuff :-

www.kalimex.co.uk/section.html?secpath=01.04.&pgid=17

Came highly recommended by a lot of people on the Land Rover forums. I must admit it seems to have worked, water useage is now nil. I had heard a few horror stories about how it could clog up the heater matrix so I bypassed this for a while until the K-seal had done it's stuff then connected it back up.
That was about 3000mls ago and it's still going strong.

Andy

shentodj

Original Poster:

401 posts

233 months

Wednesday 14th September 2005
quotequote all
Thanks very much for all of your advice. I have sent off for some Kalimex K-Seal (thanks Andys2). As you've pointed out, I don't have very much to lose!

shentodj

Original Poster:

401 posts

233 months

Friday 23rd September 2005
quotequote all
I've been running with the K-Seal since last Saturday and (fingers, legs, arms etc crossed) it seems to have done the trick and stopped the water leak.

Anyone have any ideas on how permanent this fix is likely to be?

Thanks again for all advice,
Dave.

tinker-27

835 posts

229 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2006
quotequote all
YOU CAN GET THEM TOP HAD RELINED WHICH WILL REPAIR 90% OF THE BLOCKS

victormeldrew

8,293 posts

282 months

Tuesday 3rd January 2006
quotequote all
tinker-27 said:
YOU CAN GET THEM TOP HAD RELINED WHICH WILL REPAIR 90% OF THE BLOCKS
The 5.2 conversions use top hat liners for example.