any legal buffs on here... son has

any legal buffs on here... son has

Author
Discussion

400+bhp

Original Poster:

485 posts

196 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 09 April 2011 at 19:50

restoman

947 posts

214 months

Thursday 10th February 2011
quotequote all
If a seller is buying and selling 'regularly' even as a sideline then he's classed as a trader and cars have to be fit for the purpose sold. So, in essence would be liable. Talk to him first and see what he says. If he will not play ball then tell him you will go to Trading Standards and will also make sure that HMRC know about his sideline activities - if he hasn't declared his income from this little sideline you might just find that he will be more than happy to co-operate wink

Disclaimer: this is posted as general advice as I do not know the circumstances of the seller in this particular case.
Edited by restoman on Thursday 10th February 19:47


Edited by restoman on Thursday 10th February 19:48

PaulHogan

6,487 posts

284 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
I'm not a lawyer.
Why don't you just go and talk to him. Know in your mind what you want. Listen to what he says. Do not lose your temper. See what happens. If you don't get any satisfaction* then you can go to Trading Standards/Small claims court if you want to.




*Copyright Nanker/Phelge

PaulHogan

6,487 posts

284 months

Friday 11th February 2011
quotequote all
400+bhp said:
... need to know where we stand hense the question to start with...
Sigh. Until you talk to him you won't know will you? He might accept responsibility and give you a refund: he may tell you to foxtrot oscar. Until you talk to him you don't know where you stand and nobody can give you any substantive advice.

restoman

947 posts

214 months

Wednesday 16th February 2011
quotequote all


anonymous-user

60 months

Thursday 17th February 2011
quotequote all
I'm not a legal buff, just a lawyer. As you have already been clearly advised above, if the seller is a trader then the car is subject to the implied conditions set out in the Sale of Goods Act, and a head gasket failure after one day would probably indicate that the car did not comply with those conditions.

GarryA

4,700 posts

170 months

Thursday 17th February 2011
quotequote all
So, he could have bought the car, drove it off the lot and held in on the limiter in 1st gear all the way home? Then, expect the seller to foot the bill?

Buy him a Haynes manual and the parts and let him get on with it.

anonymous-user

60 months

Thursday 17th February 2011
quotequote all
I should add that all legal disputes are fact specific, and no lawyer is Mystic Meg. As noted above, much depends on what caused the gasket failure, but it might (note the word "might") reasonably be inferred that the car had a latent defect when sold. If the seller was a private seller, then there would be no come back, but a trader cannot rely on a purported exclusion of liability by pointing to a "no warranty" statement. In theory, a claim could be pursued through the county court, but you should be under no illusion about the time and hassle involved in seeking recourse through litigation. You might suggest that you split the cost of repair with the seller, particularly if you don't wish to burn the relationship with him.

MarsellusWallace

1,180 posts

207 months

Thursday 17th February 2011
quotequote all
If you bought the car from a trader then secondhand or not your statutory rights entitle you to him covering the full cost of the repair for this.If you have signed a disclaimer then this is illegal-a trader cannot make a private customer sign away their rights.

restoman

947 posts

214 months

Thursday 17th February 2011
quotequote all
400+bhp said:
thanks for the replies latest is a good will gesture of around 30 % dont think seller was aware when selling the car, so feel the issue is resolved. Thanks all
Goodwill gesture of 30% implies that he knows he is in the wrong and is fully liable.

MGJohn

10,203 posts

189 months

Tuesday 22nd February 2011
quotequote all
Breadvan73 said:
I'm not a legal buff, just a lawyer. As you have already been clearly advised above, if the seller is a trader then the car is subject to the implied conditions set out in the Sale of Goods Act, and a head gasket failure after one day would probably indicate that the car did not comply with those conditions.
On any car, cylinder head gaskets rarely actually fail. They are first damaged by some other agency, usually overheating following coolant loss. That process can be over weeks or longer depending on circumstances. I'd bet a month's wages the cylinder head gasket was already damaged on that car prior to purchase and it's easy for someone in the trade to disguise the signs or even remove them with a few simple measures.

When ever I buy a used car, unless it's really really cheap and I can easily recover my outlay selling say the alloy wheels and tyres and a few other bits, I ALWAYS take the car for at least a twenty mile test drive being all eyes, ears and nose during the drive. Yes, smells can be informative. Many things such as slipping clutch stench, burnt wires, escaping coolant, fuel leaks etc etc.

Twenty miles gentle driving at first and if initial signs are good, faster speeds on a dual carriageway. Twenty miles should show up anything that is not right such as a suspect damaged cylinder head gasket ON ANY CAR. Then lift the bonnet whilst engine is still hot after the twenty mile drive and look and listen.

If the vendor objects to such a drive with some excuse such as low on fuel, offer to put a gallon in the car. If still no dice, WALK. There's always another.

There are a few basic checks which are a fairly reliable guide for a damaged cylinder head gasket. Search any car site for more details. In the case of the K-Series, check the sticky over on MG-Rover.org. It's very informative.

Provided only the head gasket is damaged and nothing else, most good repair outfits can do this simple job for 300-400 quid both parts and labour. Renewing the gasket on the K-Series is a doddle provided the owner did not drive on when the car started to show signs that something was wrong which caused more serious damage. Even on the Turbocharged 1.8 K-Series the job is not much more involved provided only the gasket is damaged.

Finally, 30% of 700 or 30% of 350 ... think about it ...
.

tuscan99

13 posts

162 months

Sunday 10th April 2011
quotequote all
restoman said:
Goodwill gesture of 30% implies that he knows he is in the wrong and is fully liable.
Hi new to here so hello all been reading few forums and have to comment on few. as there seems to be a certain train of thought here!!! there are a few genuine people about and to offer a gesture is not a sign of guilt!!! or admitting knowing of a problem... come on guys whats happening to this world can only assume to think like that would mean to act like that also well my first post and and got that off my chest.
have a good day all.