tuscan against Ferrari

tuscan against Ferrari

Author
Discussion

greg450se

Original Poster:

689 posts

262 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
HI all
I own a 450se which i will keep,Im deciding whether to buy a new Tuscan or a S/H 348spider.
reading the threads abiout these engines scares me.
one question.
1.does anyone know the ratio of failed engines IE year builds certain numbers are the latest ones O.K causes known and fixed etc.
I love the look noise etc of a tuscan but i might buy the Horse instead not sure.

craigw

12,248 posts

289 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
I has same dilema just over 2 years ago. I went for the 348, no disrespect to the tuscan, I love em but I just got scared off after hearing some horror stories & I'd had a Griff 500 before.

I looked very hard to find a good 348 and bought the best I saw and until I sold it 3 weeks ago it was the most reliable car I've ever owned.

jedi

197 posts

271 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
Although I will be the first to diss the tuscan due to engine problems, it does look like the issues 'may' be sorted due to a revised head on the new engines from the middle of this year. Aparently no T350C's have gone bang yet, and they all have the new head on.

Problem with the 348 is handling. It is well known to be the worst handling ferrari in recent years.

Depends what you want. You will get more respect on the road in the tuscan IMHO.

craigw

12,248 posts

289 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
GTS/Spider models are worlds apart from the earlier models.

basil brush

5,228 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
In my opinion the Tuscan looks way better than the 348 and definitely provokes a better response from people. It will also blow the 348 off the road.

bertie

8,566 posts

291 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
Or try and stretch to a 355.

swilly

9,699 posts

281 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
Spotted a 550 driving through Northwich, Cheshire last night.

Followed behind him for a few miles. No prozes for guessing who got the stares though

basil brush

5,228 posts

270 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
bertie said:
Or try and stretch to a 355.


Then I would be tempted to say go for the Italian option.

bebbesen

2,923 posts

288 months

Wednesday 10th September 2003
quotequote all
Guys,

Whilst I was extremely happy with my Red Rose Tuscan I just had enough after 3 engine rebuilds and 1 half new engine on my previous Griff. The only TVR I had without 2 or 3 new engines was a 400SE which just ran and ran.
I sincerely hope TVR has sorted their speed six out by now... sadly it put me off for life. Not the car itself but the complete lack of response from TVR. No calls, no emails, no letters. Nothing.
I was gobsmacked with the treatment of a loyal client on his 3rd TVR... Unbelieveable.

I now drive a 360 which I must say - although clearly in a different price catagory - is absolutely awsome.
Its been a year and it just starts and goes, any time, any day without any fuss. Reliable, solid and oh so amazing on the road. Nothing turns into a corner like it. Keep turning the wheel - and the car will keep turning, almost regardless of speed and grip - awsome.

Don't get me wrong - I love TVRs - goes without saying. I had 3! But with a car constantly off the road - it really wasn't much fun in the end.

Re. Tuscan/348 - I'd go for the Tuscan IF the engines are sorted. A 355 is a different kettle of fish and I would strongly urge you to take one out for a spin before deciding - you will not stop smiling on your return. That howling V8 redlined at 8500 makes grown men cry! Its not far off the pace of the Tuscan either and in many people's opinion the most beautiful Ferrari in the past decade.
Lastly, with so many blown speed six engines - you will be VERY surprised how reliable modern Ferraris are and how well they're buildt. 1 trip to the dealer per year - that's it.
I recall doing a 200 mile round trip to Fernhurst every other weekend...! (No offence TVR)

Happy motoring

Brian

darhart

71 posts

262 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
I had exactly the same choice and went for the 348 in the end. I must say i haven't regreted it one bit. I was put off the TVR by the engine horror stories and depreciation, i will most likely be able to sell the 348 in a couple of years and not loose any money on it. As for these so called handling issues with the Ferrari i have yet to find any.

MikeE

1,850 posts

291 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
darhart said:
I had exactly the same choice and went for the 348 in the end. I must say i haven't regreted it one bit. I was put off the TVR by the engine horror stories and depreciation, i will most likely be able to sell the 348 in a couple of years and not loose any money on it. As for these so called handling issues with the Ferrari i have yet to find any.


With respect you're not considering like for like here though are you? A new Tuscan S is bound to depreciate more (in % terms) than an 8 year old (?) 348.

sixspeed

2,061 posts

279 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
If the engines are sorted, then I don't think there's any competition.

If the 348 isn't too hot on handling I expect the Tuscan will probably eat it alive, since it's not shabby in this area. Straight-line performance it'll blow it away (as I did to a 348 I came up against on the A3 last year)... and looks-wise, again - no competition.


I have a March '02' car and have suffered two rebuilds so far. However, both have been covered by warranty, and I have had an extension of my warranty (taking me up to the end of next year) given to compensate for the loss of the car.


-andy-

darhart

71 posts

262 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
MikeE said:

darhart said:
I had exactly the same choice and went for the 348 in the end. I must say i haven't regreted it one bit. I was put off the TVR by the engine horror stories and depreciation, i will most likely be able to sell the 348 in a couple of years and not loose any money on it. As for these so called handling issues with the Ferrari i have yet to find any.



With respect you're not considering like for like here though are you? A new Tuscan S is bound to depreciate more (in % terms) than an 8 year old (?) 348.



But that's the whole point, this is part of the decision between the two cars being looked at. I'm not knocking the Tuscan in that it will lose more money, of course it will as you say it's new and the 348 is older. But personaly when looking at the two cars the fact that one will loose thousends of pounds while the other may even go up in value is a big part of any choice.

bertie

8,566 posts

291 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
Regards the handling issue, whilst in extremis the 348 isn't Ferraris best, the Tuscan isn no great shakes in that department either.

I don't know which is best, but if you're broaching the limits of adhesion of either on public roads, you need you're bumps feeling.

The only time you'd find out is on track, so if you intend to use it for track days it becomes more pertinent.

craigw

12,248 posts

289 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
Also cant talk about the tuscan as only passengered in one but I think you'd be quite surpeised by how good the 348 (well GTS anyway) handling is on and off the track.

>> Edited by craigw on Thursday 11th September 15:16

mdrc

446 posts

280 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
I also swapped my Tuscan for a 360 - OK a lot more expensive at the time, but secondhand cars with low mileage are getting closer in price all the time. A 355 is even closer. I'm still a massive fan of TVRs and have loads of friends that have them ....but I'm a perfectionist and really could live with the angst of there always being something wrong with my car - blown radiator, paint peeling off in flakes, speedo never really working and always displaying a different error everytime I switched on etc etc. Some people can live with it - I couldn't. The 360 is superb in every respect (and I would have had a 355 if I'd fitted in it) - main dealer servicing costs are similar if not slighly cheaper; service from dealers has been faultless; extended warranty quite a bit more expensive and insurance more expensive. But I do accept the rari is more expensive in the first place. A final point, I do know TVR dealers who are also Noble dealers who will quietly admit that the Noble is streets ahead in terms of build quality, paint finish and reliability.

BCA

8,651 posts

264 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
Stretch to a 355 - Enjoy it to the full, suffering the slightly higher servicing costs - then if its not for you, sell it for what you paid originally. By that time you'll probably be able to pick up a Tuscan S at silly money should you want to.

TUS 373

4,785 posts

288 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
A standard Tuscan will also blow away a 355. Seen it, done it...and smiled all the way home. A little childish perhaps, but he started it Miss. Get your self some Blackpool Rock, not a donkey.

Apache

39,731 posts

291 months

Thursday 11th September 2003
quotequote all
Try it, if you like it go for it, but please don't give me any bollox about depreciation.
These cars are built for idiots like us to buy with the heart not the head..........thats why they're the special and wonderful things they are

maranellouk

2,066 posts

270 months

Friday 12th September 2003
quotequote all
mdrc

How tall are you? I'm 6.4 and slot into my 355 spider (seat right back) and 360 spider. Being tall is a bugger for getting out though. I just roll out onto the floor and dust myself down. F40 and Dino are the pain stories in the garage as my knee goes so far to the left I can't change gear