0-100-0 test in auto car

0-100-0 test in auto car

Author
Discussion

d_drinks

Original Poster:

1,426 posts

276 months

Tuesday 29th July 2003
quotequote all
'The Nobel amazed with a post 10sec to 100mph the Tuscan blew it away with a scarcely believable 8.8 seconds to 100' from this weeks AutoCar bit of a fantastic headline !! The Tuscan S was only behind the Zonda C12S and one of the Caterhams (R400 i think) in terms of production times from 0-100-0 post a time in the low 12 seconds bloody good for a car with no ABS

trefor

14,661 posts

290 months

Tuesday 29th July 2003
quotequote all
Excellent.

Another 'well tuned' press car I guess. Who cares though! I'm looking forward to my copy waiting on the doormat when I get home tonight.

ChristineC

111 posts

258 months

Tuesday 29th July 2003
quotequote all
But they failed to mention that the driver absolutely hated the Tuscan
Still, I think he hated it less after he drove it than before, he told me it had all the makings of a decent car, shame they couldnt get the quality right. But he is a Porsche fan, so just doesn't get it!
(I think the rattly dash scared him..the wimp)
C

d_drinks

Original Poster:

1,426 posts

276 months

Tuesday 29th July 2003
quotequote all
Top Gear mag have a top 100 super cars type mag out at the mo under the british section the Tuscan S and Morgan Aero 8 are compared, the TVR gets full makrs something like 10 stars out of 10 overall !!!! It beats the Morgan hands down in all dept !! Looks like TVR might be getting some better press at last ...

philipleslie67

237 posts

259 months

Tuesday 29th July 2003
quotequote all
[quote=ChristineC]But they failed to mention that the driver absolutely hated the ... But he is a Porsche fan, so just doesn't get it![/quote=ChristineC]

Who cares what HE thinks!!!!

andyvdg

1,537 posts

290 months

Tuesday 29th July 2003
quotequote all
d_drinks said:
'The Nobel amazed with a post 10sec to 100mph the Tuscan blew it away with a scarcely believable 8.8 seconds to 100' from this weeks AutoCar bit of a fantastic headline !! The Tuscan S was only behind the Zonda C12S and one of the Caterhams (R400 i think) in terms of production times from 0-100-0 post a time in the low 12 seconds bloody good for a car with no ABS


Typo - it's even faster. Autocar managed to get it to 100 in 8.08 seconds!

whitey

2,508 posts

291 months

Tuesday 29th July 2003
quotequote all
Not to mention the fact it took 3.68 seconds to get to 60 mph !!!!!

nick beef

389 posts

263 months

Tuesday 29th July 2003
quotequote all
Good work Tuscan.. you've earned your stripes.. theres just nothing like a TVR for those power sprints.. simply awesome performance.. unless you've got a zonda.. you ain't going past.. we'll let the baby Tivs deal with the Zonda on the track.. oh yeah..

d_drinks

Original Poster:

1,426 posts

276 months

Wednesday 30th July 2003
quotequote all
andyvdg said:

Typo - it's even faster. Autocar managed to get it to 100 in 8.08 seconds!


Yeah my typo was trying to remember the figures from a lunch time browsing session in WH Smith !!

barefoot

1,050 posts

291 months

Wednesday 30th July 2003
quotequote all
I have posted under general TVR gassing but did you guys notice the standing mile times only the Zonda quicker than the Tuscan of all the road cars!

Jon Gwynne

96 posts

257 months

Wednesday 30th July 2003
quotequote all
How about the 0-60 time? Anyone notice that it was 3.68 seconds?! That isn't some marketing geek's wishful thinking of what might be possible if the weather, wind and driver are just right. That's what was actually measured in a real test. Can we assume this means that all the car mags (as well as TVR themselves) will be updating their literature on the Tuscan S to indicate a 0-60 time of 3.7 seconds?

Stop me if I'm wrong but isn't that in the same league as major exotica like the Pagani Zonda... oh, wait, the TVR was faster to 60 and only half a second slower to 100 than an Italian-built millionaire's plaything whose VAT costs more than the price of a Tuscan S delivered to your door with all the options (and several grand change).

They can keep the Pope's shoes, if someone handed me the keys to a Tuscan and the keys to a Pagani and said "Pick one! (and, no, you're not allowed to sell it)", I'd be driving home in Blackpool's finest.

And maybe this test will stop people once and for all from whining about TVR's perfectly sensible decision to leave ABS off their cars. Any car that can stop dead from 100mph in 4.15 seconds doesn't need any "improving" done to its brakes - especially since so many cars with ABS couldn't match the TVR's braking time. ;->

Alf Essex

1,467 posts

268 months

Thursday 31st July 2003
quotequote all
Jon Gwynne said:
How about the 0-60 time? Anyone notice that it was 3.68 seconds?! That isn't some marketing geek's wishful thinking of what might be possible if the weather, wind and driver are just right. That's what was actually measured in a real test. Can we assume this means that all the car mags (as well as TVR themselves) will be updating their literature on the Tuscan S to indicate a 0-60 time of 3.7 seconds?

And maybe this test will stop people once and for all from whining about TVR's perfectly sensible decision to leave ABS off their cars. Any car that can stop dead from 100mph in 4.15 seconds doesn't need any "improving" done to its brakes - especially since so many cars with ABS couldn't match the TVR's braking time. ;->



Totally agree! It about time we sing the praises of TVR especially the Tuscan S and stop knocking a great British Car!! mines the dogs b@ll@cks...!

Oh edited to say...I hope the boy racers out there have read this article...as every time I go out I seem to attract idiots on my tail, but I don't have to prove anything...read said article nuff said!

Alan.

>> Edited by Alf Essex on Thursday 31st July 08:09

rev-erend

21,536 posts

291 months

Thursday 31st July 2003
quotequote all
Did anyone notice that used a rather unusual brand
of tyre for the Tuscan - I'd never heard of 'em...

Must have been responsible for most of the time improvement - wonder if we'll se them on the road cars soon... ?

Someone post the name of them up hear if they have the magazine to hand !

RichB

52,782 posts

291 months

Thursday 31st July 2003
quotequote all
Well the writer of the articel called them "Trampio el trampio" I have no idea if he was trying to be funny or what but I've never heard of them and I assume neither have most Autocar readers. Rich...

edited to add that doing a bit of a search they seem to be a Toyo semi-slick track tyre tyre. http://mitawards.org/toyo_tyres.html

>> Edited by RichB on Thursday 31st July 13:55

>> Edited by RichB on Thursday 31st July 14:01

rev-erend

21,536 posts

291 months

Thursday 31st July 2003
quotequote all
They must be good for 1 second off the 0 ~ 100 ~ 0 !!

dannylt

1,906 posts

291 months

Thursday 31st July 2003
quotequote all
...if not more. But then the Caterham R500 was probably on ACB10's, who knows how warmed up they'd been? Personally I'm staggered the Tuscan out braked the Radical! I can only imagine the brakes were cold (when they're shit).

danny

joospeed

4,473 posts

285 months

Thursday 31st July 2003
quotequote all
dannylt said:
...if not more. But then the Caterham R500 was probably on ACB10's, who knows how warmed up they'd been? Personally I'm staggered the Tuscan out braked the Radical! I can only imagine the brakes were cold (when they're shit).

danny


or they weren't running enough air brake, er I mean wing

ScoobyManchester

1,163 posts

269 months

Friday 1st August 2003
quotequote all
rev-erend said:
They must be good for 1 second off the 0 ~ 100 ~ 0 !!

AutoExpress timed the same Tuscan S ages ago, the 0-100mph time was only 0.02secs different.....still bloomin' fast no matter what tyres it wears!

ultimaandy

1,225 posts

271 months

Friday 1st August 2003
quotequote all
I'll also point out that the surface tested on was concrete so the track tyres may have gained back what it was losing with the poor surface...... I struggled like mad for traction as my road tyres just didn't want to grip on that surface.

And yes the R500 did have sticky track tyres on (I think A032R's but didn't check) but thats what the average R500 wears so hardly 'cheating'.

bobski

1,589 posts

271 months

Friday 1st August 2003
quotequote all
No need to change up to second gear! What the fcuk?!!!!

whitey said:
Not to mention the fact it took 3.68 seconds to get to 60 mph !!!!!