Question about terminology...

Question about terminology...

Author
Discussion

JonGwynne

Original Poster:

270 posts

272 months

Friday 13th September 2002
quotequote all
The following is my understanding of the Tuscan line, can anyone correct any of this? Thanks.

There is the Tuscan Speed Six which has the 3.6L engine (the same engine found in the Tamora) which is rated by the factory at 350bhp.

There is the Tuscan S which has the 4.0L engine (the same engine found in the Cerbera Speed Six) which is rated by the factory at 390bhp.

Now, what puzzles me is that I sometimes see cars which are referred to just as "Tuscans" (No "S") but have 4.0L engines. Does this mean there's a difference between the plain 4.0L model and the "S" model or is it just understood that the car with the 4.0L engine is an "S"?

Also, I hear talk that the original incarnation of the 4.0L engine was less powerful and that only newer Tuscan S's get the uprated engine. If this is true, when was the switch made and can the upgrade(s) be retrofit?

Lastly, the Tuscan R claims 450bhp from its 4.0L engine. Can any of that power boost be had by owners of current models and if so, at what price?

Thanks,

J

Lance

567 posts

270 months

Friday 13th September 2002
quotequote all
early (pre-2001) tuscans were only sold with a 4.0 version of the standard 3.6 S6, with an optional "red rose" (RR)performance package. The introduction of the Tamora saw a re-pricing/re-speccing to make the two cars fit together in the line-up. Or so TVR marketing reckoned...


Jarrett

100 posts

291 months

Friday 13th September 2002
quotequote all
As far as I am aware it goes;

Original Tuscan - 4.0L 360BHP (tweaked Cerbie Speed Six engine 4.0L 350BHP) - Nolonger available

Tuscan with Red Rose option - 4.0L 380BHP (upgraded cam plus other mods) - Nolonger available

Current Tuscan - 3.6L 350BHP (same engine as Tamora)

Tuscan S - 4.0L 390BHP (basically tweaked RR engine)

Tuscan R - 4.2L? 440BHP? (bigger capacity S engine plus mods)

There are rumours that the RR became the S due to a problem with type approval. Then it became a bit of a problem having an S with only 30BHP more than the standard Tuscan but costing 10K more, so the engine was reduced to 3.6. Don't know if this is right but makes a bit of sense.

andyvdg

1,537 posts

290 months

Friday 13th September 2002
quotequote all
I think this is nearly right. Some comments :

quote:

As far as I am aware it goes;

Original Tuscan - 4.0L 360BHP (tweaked Cerbie Speed Six engine 4.0L 350BHP) - Nolonger available

I think this is still available

Tuscan with Red Rose option - 4.0L 380BHP (upgraded cam plus other mods) - Nolonger available

Comes with adjustable suspension + bigger brakes

Current Tuscan - 3.6L 350BHP (same engine as Tamora)

Has anyone actually bought this version ? Is it really available ?

Tuscan S - 4.0L 390BHP (basically tweaked RR engine)

There is some suspicion that the "standard 4.0" suspension and maybe brakes were changed around this time as well to be similiar to the S.

Tuscan R - 4.2L? 440BHP? (bigger capacity S engine plus mods)

There are rumours that the RR became the S due to a problem with type approval. Then it became a bit of a problem having an S with only 30BHP more than the standard Tuscan but costing 10K more, so the engine was reduced to 3.6. Don't know if this is right but makes a bit of sense.

osullivd

24 posts

272 months

Saturday 14th September 2002
quotequote all
Just to throw my tuppence in - just bought my new Tuscan (2 weeks old ) and it has the 4.0L engine rather than the 3.6, although when ordered back in May, I was told that there were very few of these left and that most of the new ones will be 3.6's.

Being a cynical person, I would think a certain amount of this is spin, as your average salesman would prefer to say "Wow, you are getting a 4.0L 360bhp for the same price as a 3.6L 350bhp", but they surely have to start selling the cars as advertised? Also, believe they are no longer producing the 4.0L engine so once they run out of them they are gone...

Graham and Rosie

850 posts

291 months

Monday 16th September 2002
quotequote all
TVR get their vehicles through type approval by using the limited production run rules, this is less than 500 (I think, not sure if that is total or more likely per year)
The "new models" come seem to be very similar to the "old" models
Could this just be a way of producing more cars than they should while still using the limted production rules and so save loads of money in crash testing etc???
Synical? Moi?

In reality I think it is more likely to distinguish the updates applied as models go through their life, but the story above sounds better in the bar

Graham

NickD

417 posts

269 months

Monday 16th September 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Just to throw my tuppence in - just bought my new Tuscan (2 weeks old ) and it has the 4.0L engine rather than the 3.6, although when ordered back in May, I was told that there were very few of these left and that most of the new ones will be 3.6's.

Being a cynical person, I would think a certain amount of this is spin, as your average salesman would prefer to say "Wow, you are getting a 4.0L 360bhp for the same price as a 3.6L 350bhp", but they surely have to start selling the cars as advertised? Also, believe they are no longer producing the 4.0L engine so once they run out of them they are gone...



I also had this when ordered (specifically) a 3.6 earlier this year. When I received the reg document it said that it was 4.0. I questionned the dealer who then spoke to s/o at TVR. I was then told that all the docs were coming back as 4.0 although it is 3.6, honest sir () but that they were sorting this out and when sorted they'd arrange for a new doc.

I haven't heard anything since but to be honest, having now just passed the 2000 mile run-in barrier I'm beginning not to care.

ajvmoore

170 posts

286 months

Monday 16th September 2002
quotequote all
I have an 'original - non rr 4.0 litre - 23000 mls and one top end rebuild. I agree with the previous postings about the evolution, but also I'm sure that some of the mentioned are wet sumped, mine and the RR are dry. Am probably wrong, but I heard something once, pie-talk .

andyvdg

1,537 posts

290 months

Monday 16th September 2002
quotequote all
I think the 3.6 was supposed to be wet sumped. But I think it turned out dry as well.