newbie cayman owner
newbie cayman owner
Author
Discussion

koopa

Original Poster:

118 posts

240 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
hi guys,

i currently drive a dodge viper GTS and have decided to get something a little more subtle for daily use while i keep the viper in storage for summer. Have never owned a porsche before so am looking forward to the experience

I chose a new Cayman/Cockster/Boxster with hard on whatever you want to call it lol.
Seen a few write ups and it seems to get a good review as a drivers car.

Has anyone driven the 2.7 and the 3.4S back to back? Was there much of a difference?

Cheers guys

Dr S

5,153 posts

256 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
Yep, the regular Cayman lacks the necessary ooomph which the S delivers. Simple as that.

Welcom to the Porsche club. thumbup

Davey S2

13,394 posts

284 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
koopa said:
Cayman/Cockster/Boxster with hard on whatever you want to call it



laugh

Go for the S version if you can.

PorkScratching

1,289 posts

238 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
Great car - go for the S.

koopa

Original Poster:

118 posts

240 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
lol, thanks DrS

unfortunately i went for the 2.7
Im only 24 so stretching to the 3.4S for an extra 5 odd grand or whatever it is for an extra half second to sixty just didnt seem like a wise decision to me
Plus my viper pretty much takes care of any need for silly speed.

koopa

Original Poster:

118 posts

240 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
another reason i went for the 2.7 is because all of the S versions appearing at my dealer just now seem to be tiptronic cars

I wanted a manual balsalt black car (original i know lol)and the next one coming through at the dealer was that spec with 19" carrera S wheels with black centres so i chose that one.

Any owners in the glasgow area?

Dr S

5,153 posts

256 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
koopa said:
unfortunately i went for the 2.7
Im only 24 so stretching to the 3.4S for an extra 5 odd grand or whatever it is for an extra half second to sixty just didnt seem like a wise decision to me .


Son, these are the kind of mistakes youth let's you get into. But don't worry, the next time you stand in front of such a decision, you know how to do the right thing though...

:scratcheshismightywhitebeardandfeelssooooowiseindeed:

Wetwipe

3,019 posts

243 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
welcome bro

shoestring7

6,194 posts

276 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
Dr S said:
Yep, the regular Cayman lacks the necessary ooomph which the S delivers. Simple as that.

Welcom to the Porsche club. thumbup


I guess that depends on your perspective of what 'oomph' is. Road & Track magazine went to Germany to try one with the 6 speed box and could only get it to 60mph in a sluggish 5.3 seconds. Their V-max was a miserable 160mph too. That's about the same as a 3.3l 930.

Of course it doesn't have the torque of the 3.4, but having to keep the engine in its >4000rpm sweet spot is part of the fun.

It handles better that its soft GT cousins too

SS7

koopa

Original Poster:

118 posts

240 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
lol, thanks for the welcome guys!! I guess ill have to live with the shame of owning a Cayman - lite! If i like it i plan to upgrade to a 911 in the summer anyways so the slight lack of performance wont hinder my enjoyment for long

kennyboy

641 posts

269 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
koopa said:
lol, thanks for the welcome guys!! I guess ill have to live with the shame of owning a Cayman - lite! If i like it i plan to upgrade to a 911 in the summer anyways so the slight lack of performance wont hinder my enjoyment for long


a 911 before you're 25? - congratulations.....there were still only a wet dream for me at 24.

Dr S

5,153 posts

256 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
shoestring7 said:
Dr S said:
Yep, the regular Cayman lacks the necessary ooomph which the S delivers. Simple as that.

Welcom to the Porsche club. thumbup


I guess that depends on your perspective of what 'oomph' is. Road & Track magazine went to Germany to try one with the 6 speed box and could only get it to 60mph in a sluggish 5.3 seconds. Their V-max was a miserable 160mph too. That's about the same as a 3.3l 930.

Of course it doesn't have the torque of the 3.4, but having to keep the engine in its >4000rpm sweet spot is part of the fun.

It handles better that its soft GT cousins too

SS7



I test drove the Cayman S right after a 997 4S and was not dissapointed. R&T might have filled the tank with diesel...

pikey

7,704 posts

314 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
koopa said:
unfortunately i went for the 2.7
Im only 24 so stretching to the 3.4S for an extra 5 odd grand or whatever it is for an extra half second to sixty just didnt seem like a wise decision to me
Welcome!

That's quite a car for a 24 year old. I had a beaten up Supra when I was that age!

The 'S' is more than just the bigger engine, it has a 6 sp gearbox, bigger brakes, limited slip diff, better standard wheels, nicer seats, and "some other stuff" that I can't remember because I'm not that geeky!

Pikey

PS. I lied about the limited slip diff

koopa

Original Poster:

118 posts

240 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
is the 6 speed box much of an advantage? I wonder if the gear ratios are shorter on the 5 speed? Perhaps make it feel a bit punchier than a six speed?

Brakes arent really a big issue as the ones on my viper have no ABS so i consider the porsche standard brakes a bonus lol!!

I do a lot of milage as part of my job so i really chose the Cayman as a motorway smoker with a bit of twisty action thrown in when i have the time. Has anyone pitted a stock Cayman vs a Cayman S on the track? That would be interesting to see

pikey

7,704 posts

314 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
Dunno?

It's a great car you have so enjoy

anonymous-user

84 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
Gear ratios are definitely changed on the 6-speed!

slippydiff

16,424 posts

253 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Gear ratios are definitely changed on the 6-speed!


I've been told the ratios (2nd and 3rd) in the six speed Cayman box are closer to those fitted in the Boxsters six speed equivalent. Anyone know if this is the case ?

croyde

26,427 posts

260 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
A 911 is still a wet dream for me and I'm 44 and with young kids so I doubt I'd ever get there. Something to do with private education cry

SuperlightR

12,920 posts

293 months

Thursday 18th January 2007
quotequote all
I had a nissan sunny zx at 24 ! (poke no fun at it cos a poke in the eye hurts)


You will love your cayman lite. Well balanced, good power to weight, looks great.


Edited by SuperlightR on Thursday 18th January 22:45

articm

183 posts

238 months

Friday 19th January 2007
quotequote all
koopa said:
lol, thanks DrS

unfortunately i went for the 2.7
Im only 24 so stretching to the 3.4S for an extra 5 odd grand or whatever it is for an extra half second to sixty just didnt seem like a wise decision to me
Plus my viper pretty much takes care of any need for silly speed.




hmmm hmmmm isn't the new Boxster S a 3.4 now, so whats the upside of the Cayman over that - given your paying a premium for the coupe......the standard boxster chassis is more than capable of handling the bhp so not sure you really need the extra stiffness.