996 turbo s mx05 aky
Discussion
yajeed said:
RC1 said:
bca are auctioning one later this month with 71k miles and what looks to be reasonable MOT and service history... what do we think its worth?
40k in a private sale I'd guess?The cheapest (non-S) turbos of that age are around the £40k mark.
JZM (admittedly top-end dealer pricing) have 2 turbo S - one at £85k and one at £78k (now reserved).
monthefish said:
How have you arrived at that figure?
The cheapest (non-S) turbos of that age are around the £40k mark.
JZM (admittedly top-end dealer pricing) have 2 turbo S - one at £85k and one at £78k (now reserved).
Finger in the air. I was keeping an eye on the low mileage red example at £50k and scaled downward due to mileage and it's unknown provenance. The cheapest (non-S) turbos of that age are around the £40k mark.
JZM (admittedly top-end dealer pricing) have 2 turbo S - one at £85k and one at £78k (now reserved).
Admittedly, I didn't consider the premium for an S.
This is sub 40, and ignoring the seller (who may be brilliant - I've never dealt with them directly, but an auction surely is the lowest of the low), seems comparable?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
Edited by yajeed on Tuesday 7th February 16:37
yajeed said:
Finger in the air. I was keeping an eye on the low mileage red example at £50k and scaled downward due to mileage and it's unknown provenance.
Admittedly, I didn't consider the premium for an S.
This is sub 40, and ignoring the seller (who may be brilliant - I've never dealt with them directly, but an auction surely is the lowest of the low), seems comparable?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
90k miles and 9 previous owners. Dealer based in Keighley - read reviews and beware.Admittedly, I didn't consider the premium for an S.
This is sub 40, and ignoring the seller (who may be brilliant - I've never dealt with them directly, but an auction surely is the lowest of the low), seems comparable?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
Edited by yajeed on Tuesday 7th February 16:37
yajeed said:
Finger in the air. I was keeping an eye on the low mileage red example at £50k and scaled downward due to mileage and it's unknown provenance.
Admittedly, I didn't consider the premium for an S.
This is sub 40, and ignoring the seller (who may be brilliant - I've never dealt with them directly, but an auction surely is the lowest of the low), seems comparable?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
It's not a Turbo S but as usual is misleadingly advertised as a Turbo Tiptronic S (the tip is "s" whatever that means..)Admittedly, I didn't consider the premium for an S.
This is sub 40, and ignoring the seller (who may be brilliant - I've never dealt with them directly, but an auction surely is the lowest of the low), seems comparable?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/p...
Edited by yajeed on Tuesday 7th February 16:37
Carlson W6 said:
monthefish said:
A turbo S has never been 21k.
Did you miss my next post? :-)Even still, I don't recall a straight S ever being that low. In 2014, they were only ten years old.
My recollection is that the bottom of the market for a straight non-s turbo was just under 20k, but that was for the earliest cars (2000) with mega miles and/or patchy histories and/or tip gearboxes and/or savannah interiors.
To give you an idea, I paid £35k for a 55k mile 996 Turbo S from a dealer back in July 2012. That was a September 2005 car, one of the last handful off the production line according to the chassis number, so as new as it's possible for a 996 to be. They never really got cheaper than that, although mine wasn't the cheapest on the market (there were a few private sales in the low 30s when I bought). Within a year or so they were starting to creep up, obviously they've gone a bit bonkers since.
Gassing Station | Porsche General | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


