Audi B5 RS4

Author
Discussion

Muppet32

Original Poster:

173 posts

186 months

Sunday 20th June 2010
quotequote all
When the RS2 came out back in 94 or so, I wanted one. Trouble is, I was 15. Then, when the RS4 was released in 2000 I wanted one of those too. That crazy combination of incredible power and traction that you'd would only usually find in a Porsche 911, Ferrari or similar, but wrapped up in a German estate car - awesome, understated performance. cool Still I was in my early 20s and learning stuff and trying to forge my way in life was declared to be a more sensible use of time and money than splaffing £60k on a load lugger.

I've alway wanted a Lotus Carlton too, but I realise that these are actually a st car underneath, so I can happily just leave the LC as a dream hehe

So on finding a few grand down the back of the sofa recently, I went out and bought a nice tidy 2001 RS4. It had to be red, as that's the fastest colour. yes

Like a lot of RS4s, it's been tuned. An MTM chip and exhaust allegedly gives the car 428 bhp and some massive 380mm MOVIT brakes slow it down again. It is extremely fast. It handles very well although, admittedly, it doesn't have the finesse of a BMW M car. I like it smile











MGZRod

8,096 posts

182 months

Sunday 20th June 2010
quotequote all
Amazing cars and they have such presence. Your one looks fantastic and hope your living the dream! smile

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

214 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
Very nice! I like it.

Although, I thought Lotus Carltons were meant to be good? Never heard a bad review!

akita1

490 posts

206 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
Yummy if my dog was smaller i would have one of these instead of running 2 cars. Bill.

NotNormal

2,370 posts

220 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
Muppet32 said:
I've alway wanted a Lotus Carlton too, but I realise that these are actually a st car underneath,
Not sure what your basing this opinion on. confused

All cars have their known faults, including the B5 RS4 wink

John_L

11 posts

221 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
Very nice indeed, and in the best colour. I bet it surprises a few people.

russy01

4,711 posts

187 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
NotNormal said:
Muppet32 said:
I've alway wanted a Lotus Carlton too, but I realise that these are actually a st car underneath,
Not sure what your basing this opinion on. confused

All cars have their known faults, including the B5 RS4 wink
likewise, father in law did 80k in his, all miles being very hard as he's an ex racer. No problems to report.

Chicane-UK

3,861 posts

191 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
Stunning! I've only heard / read of a few people with these but heard they can be scarily expensive to fix if they break. Hope you've got a few more grand down the back of the sofa just in case...? smile

ManOpener

12,467 posts

175 months

Monday 21st June 2010
quotequote all
Chicane-UK said:
Stunning! I've only heard / read of a few people with these but heard they can be scarily expensive to fix if they break. Hope you've got a few more grand down the back of the sofa just in case...? smile
K04 turbos are something like £800 each from Audi, which has encouraged lots of people to go Garrett GT series when they go pop. A lot of work is engine-out which increases the price if your not doing it at home.

Muppet32

Original Poster:

173 posts

186 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
russy01 said:
NotNormal said:
Muppet32 said:
I've alway wanted a Lotus Carlton too, but I realise that these are actually a st car underneath,
Not sure what your basing this opinion on. confused

All cars have their known faults, including the B5 RS4 wink
likewise, father in law did 80k in his, all miles being very hard as he's an ex racer. No problems to report.
My original comment about the Lotus Carlton was a bit tongue in cheek. tongue out In terms of the bits Lotus added to the Carlton - they were top notch and extremely well engineered but underneath, it's still a mid market GM rustbucket from the late 80s. You'll struggle to find an LC that hasn't been affected by tin worm and generally, the engineering that went into the rest of the 'Carlton' bits is err, lacklustre. Door hinges that click, poor interior trim, poor panel gaps, vauxhall switchgear etc.

It's still a phenomenal car, but those elements would spoil the experience for me.

I appreciate the B5 RS4 certainly has its problems from turbo wear to chocolate cams and gearbox problems etc, but as they're based on a high end, arguably over engineered vehicle in the first place, they don't generally rust and there is an overall feel of granite like sturdiness about the car.

smile

gsd2000

11,515 posts

189 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
Nice rs4, i do like lotus carltons and still want one, but in the mean time i think i will stick to my monaro.

ManOpener

12,467 posts

175 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
Muppet32 said:
I appreciate the B5 RS4 certainly has its problems from turbo wear to chocolate cams and gearbox problems etc, but as they're based on a high end, arguably over engineered vehicle in the first place, they don't generally rust and there is an overall feel of granite like sturdiness about the car.

smile
I didn't know that S/RS4's had brittle camshafts. I'm sure people have pushed silly power out of the standard ones. The Tiptronic box, however...my mates dad has a Tiptronic S4 and he's "killed" the box more than once.

NotNormal

2,370 posts

220 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
Muppet32 said:
My original comment about the Lotus Carlton was a bit tongue in cheek. tongue out In terms of the bits Lotus added to the Carlton - they were top notch and extremely well engineered but underneath, it's still a mid market GM rustbucket from the late 80s. You'll struggle to find an LC that hasn't been affected by tin worm and generally, the engineering that went into the rest of the 'Carlton' bits is err, lacklustre. Door hinges that click, poor interior trim, poor panel gaps, vauxhall switchgear etc.

It's still a phenomenal car, but those elements would spoil the experience for me.

I appreciate the B5 RS4 certainly has its problems from turbo wear to chocolate cams and gearbox problems etc, but as they're based on a high end, arguably over engineered vehicle in the first place, they don't generally rust and there is an overall feel of granite like sturdiness about the car.

smile
So basically your trying to compare a car designed and built 20 years ago to one that that was built only 10 years ago. Mmm, how odd scratchchin

But yes appreciate that finding a good LC these days is harder than finding a good RS4. Which I think is a shame really as people like yourself come up with comments as above based on viewings of un-cared for cars with many years already under their belt.

Congrats on the purchase though, btw my friend used to work for QST for many years so I know how fast these cars can go with some fettling. smile

GregorFuk

563 posts

206 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
ManOpener said:
Chicane-UK said:
Stunning! I've only heard / read of a few people with these but heard they can be scarily expensive to fix if they break. Hope you've got a few more grand down the back of the sofa just in case...? smile
K04 turbos are something like £800 each from Audi, which has encouraged lots of people to go Garrett GT series when they go pop. A lot of work is engine-out which increases the price if your not doing it at home.
I ran one of these for over a year and it cost an absolute fortune.

If a turbo goes then both must be changed, they are £1200 each and you can add another £1200 in labour for the engine pull required to get to them. Whilst the engine is out you might as well break the gearbox and do the clutch too. Thankfully that's only £150. Mine had the newer B7 brakes on the front which meant £250 per front disk and £150 for a set of pads, rears arn't much cheaper, £215 a disk and £80 for pads. I had to deal with all of the above. Plus silly things like the airbag ecu (£380). Nothing on these cars is cheap, as soon as RS is mentioned the part prices go up by 200%. They can have syncro issues and quite a few are suffering from camshaft failure, luckily neither of these effected mine.

On the bright side they are very very quick. Mine had 420bhp and in a straight line was ballistic, unfortunately it all fell apart in the corners, it really wasn't up to much on a twisty road. Once the excitement of the acceleration wore off it really didn't have much more to offer. I sold it and bought an Elise which is a much more involving drive.

Edited by GregorFuk on Tuesday 22 June 22:52

Muppet32

Original Poster:

173 posts

186 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
NotNormal said:
Muppet32 said:
My original comment about the Lotus Carlton was a bit tongue in cheek. tongue out In terms of the bits Lotus added to the Carlton - they were top notch and extremely well engineered but underneath, it's still a mid market GM rustbucket from the late 80s. You'll struggle to find an LC that hasn't been affected by tin worm and generally, the engineering that went into the rest of the 'Carlton' bits is err, lacklustre. Door hinges that click, poor interior trim, poor panel gaps, vauxhall switchgear etc.

It's still a phenomenal car, but those elements would spoil the experience for me.

I appreciate the B5 RS4 certainly has its problems from turbo wear to chocolate cams and gearbox problems etc, but as they're based on a high end, arguably over engineered vehicle in the first place, they don't generally rust and there is an overall feel of granite like sturdiness about the car.

smile
So basically your trying to compare a car designed and built 20 years ago to one that that was built only 10 years ago. Mmm, how odd scratchchin

But yes appreciate that finding a good LC these days is harder than finding a good RS4. Which I think is a shame really as people like yourself come up with comments as above based on viewings of un-cared for cars with many years already under their belt. smile
I appreciate there's a 6/7 year difference between the cars, but they're still in the same market segment, appealing to similar people. The failings of the Lotus Carlton are nothing really to do with its age, but the fact that the Carlton is a lower quality product, built to a lower price than the B5 A4, and it shows.

My views are nothing to do with ill-cared for cars, but a reasonable technical observation of Carltons and A4s.

All that aside, I'd still love a Lotus Carlton - mostly due to its rarity. I'd have to shut my eyes when looking at the dashboard though wink

420

44 posts

173 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
hmm, notnormal you do seem like a good old boy an LC hasn't exactly got the mint factor of an RS4 for me personally, that aside this is his progress blog so keep it civil and resrained at all times?, have a look at my blog

Muppet32

Original Poster:

173 posts

186 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
GregorFuk said:
ManOpener said:
Chicane-UK said:
Stunning! I've only heard / read of a few people with these but heard they can be scarily expensive to fix if they break. Hope you've got a few more grand down the back of the sofa just in case...? smile
K04 turbos are something like £800 each from Audi, which has encouraged lots of people to go Garrett GT series when they go pop. A lot of work is engine-out which increases the price if your not doing it at home.
I ran one of these for over a year and it cost an absolute fortune.

If a turbo goes then both must be changed, they are £1200 each and you can add another £1200 in labour for the engine pull required to get to them. Whilst the engine is out you might as well break the gearbox and do the clutch too. Thankfully that's only £150. Mine had the newer B7 brakes on the front which meant £250 per front disk and £150 for a set of pads, rears arn't much cheaper, £215 a disk and £80 for pads. I had to deal with all of the above. Plus silly things like the airbag ecu (£380). Nothing on these cars is cheap, as soon as RS is mentioned the part prices go up by 200%. They can have syncro issues and quite a few are suffering from camshaft failure, luckily neither of these effected mine.



On the bright side they are very very quick. Mine had 420bhp and in a straight line was ballistic, unfortunately it all fell apart in the corners, it really wasn't up to much on a twisty road. Once the excitement of the acceleration wore off it really didn't have much more to offer. I sold it and bought an Elise which is a much more involving drive.

Edited by GregorFuk on Tuesday 22 June 22:52
Yes, yes, yes and yes. smile

To run one of these you either need deep pocket or a good chunk of initiative.

It is defintitely fast - I don't think any right minded individual would dispute that. It does corner very effectively, but it's not very communicative or particularly rewarding. An Elise would certainly be considerably more involving. But as they share indicator stalks with the Cavalier, they have to be discounted from this discussion wink

Muppet32

Original Poster:

173 posts

186 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
420 said:
hmm, notnormal you do seem like a good old boy an LC hasn't exactly got the mint factor of an RS4 for me personally, that aside this is his progress blog so keep it civil and resrained at all times?, have a look at my blog
A nice LC is far mor exclusive than an RS4. Don't worry about attacking my argument - you have to say some things to get a response sometimes hehe

420

44 posts

173 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
my friend I have never attacked a thing as long as I've lived

Muppet32

Original Poster:

173 posts

186 months

Tuesday 22nd June 2010
quotequote all
420 said:
my friend I have never attacked a thing as long as I've lived
Err, not you smile You were asking Notnormal to keep it civil, and I was saying: 'don't worry!'

smile