106 GTI

Author
Discussion

TopCAD

Original Poster:

146 posts

184 months

Tuesday 7th July 2009
quotequote all
Fairly new to the forum and I've just bought myself a 106 GTi...

Its standard apart from an air filter and quick shift.

Cheers Pete













red_rover

848 posts

226 months

Tuesday 7th July 2009
quotequote all
Fisrt class. Peugeot did such a great job with this car.

Yours looks to be an excellent example! Far too many have been modded frown

Greendubber

13,687 posts

209 months

Tuesday 7th July 2009
quotequote all
Looks nice and tidy, good find.

Great colour too smile


patmahe

5,820 posts

210 months

Tuesday 7th July 2009
quotequote all
Congrats matey, looks the business. I've always admired these and have wanted one myself for a long time, but two cars is my limit at the moment so until one of them goes that particular dream is on hold.

Hope it serves you well, be sure to do the odd report on it. Eg. Well guys 3 months on with my 106gti..." I would be very interested to read it.

MattyB_

2,046 posts

263 months

Tuesday 7th July 2009
quotequote all

Looks like a "Barry" car to me wink


snotrag

14,828 posts

217 months

Tuesday 7th July 2009
quotequote all
Bloody brill little cars. lovely colour, Diablo red. Never comes across in pictures as well as in real life when the suns on it. My GTi-6 was Diablo Red.

Hoofty

696 posts

196 months

Tuesday 7th July 2009
quotequote all
Great choice! Mine is sat outside right now - because the wheel bearings are f*cked.

I'd lose the intrigingly placed GTI badges on the front and rear, and you can't go wrong with the Pugsport/Scorpion 'group N' exhaust. Pops and bangs like clockwork once you learn how - but you'll have to put the original back on for an MOT.

Edit: I know you know better, but please don't ever, ever, ever get tempted to lower it. Peugeot had their best people on this job - no amount of under-developed aftermarket parts or fiddling with the torsion bars is going to improve it. It's a dynamic gem.

Edited by Hoofty on Tuesday 7th July 20:40

snotrag

14,828 posts

217 months

Tuesday 7th July 2009
quotequote all
Hoofty said:
Edit: I know you know better, but please don't ever, ever, ever get tempted to lower it. Peugeot had their best people on this job - no amount of under-developed aftermarket parts or fiddling with the torsion bars is going to improve it. It's a dynamic gem.
He's not wrong. This really is one of the most infuriating sights - Whats makes the Peugeor 106 and 306 so good, the standout 'feature', the USP, is the incredibly compliant, plush, grippy, well damped ride and handling along a typical british B-road. It really doesnt get any better.

Yet the amount you see smashed to the ground, bouncing around, bottoming out and sparking all over the road is ridiculous. Way to ruin a good (great!) car.

TopCAD

Original Poster:

146 posts

184 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
Yes i wont be doing that... I looked for one that was pretty standard... Which are rare to find these days... usually some scally has had them and stuck loads of st on it. like Lexarse Lights etc etc.

But I found this one fairly local, standard and not too expensive!

Ponk

1,380 posts

198 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
snotrag said:
Hoofty said:
Edit: I know you know better, but please don't ever, ever, ever get tempted to lower it. Peugeot had their best people on this job - no amount of under-developed aftermarket parts or fiddling with the torsion bars is going to improve it. It's a dynamic gem.
He's not wrong. This really is one of the most infuriating sights - Whats makes the Peugeor 106 and 306 so good, the standout 'feature', the USP, is the incredibly compliant, plush, grippy, well damped ride and handling along a typical british B-road. It really doesnt get any better.

Yet the amount you see smashed to the ground, bouncing around, bottoming out and sparking all over the road is ridiculous. Way to ruin a good (great!) car.
As long as you keep the back about 15-20mm higher than the front it wont ruin the handling. Unfortunately slamming the back so it looks like there are three sumo wrestlers in the car seems to be the fashion. Nothing wrong with subtle lowering to around -30-40mm.

Gwaredd

381 posts

228 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
Ponk said:
Nothing wrong with subtle lowering to around -30-40mm.
Yes there is. Everything. Utter cack mod.

Burgmeister

2,206 posts

216 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
Gwaredd said:
Ponk said:
Nothing wrong with subtle lowering to around -30-40mm.
Yes there is. Everything. Utter cack mod.
It is a cack mod especially for this car.

Ponk - i reckon you're on the wrong site.

snotrag

14,828 posts

217 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
I have never been in a lowered Peugeot which handled better than stock on B-roads.

P.S. - I believe that most people who do this are the ones who confuse 'no bodyroll' with 'good handling'.

EvoBarry

1,903 posts

271 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
MattyB_ said:
Looks like a "Barry" car to me wink
Har har wink

Glad you're enjoying it mate, its a good 'un that so look after it biggrin

We agree on the mod front too, which is why this one only has a couple of subtle mods, as recommended by Skip Brown, where its been lovingly serviced these past few years.

I have a few pics of the car if you want me to mail some over btw, email/pm me if so.

B.


Hoofty

696 posts

196 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
I daresay that lowering of a significant amount (more than 10-15mm in my book) may be achieveable without too many noticeable drawbacks, but it's a poor direction on several fronts. Chances are there's only about 20mm clearance to the bumpstops at standard ride height, so even mild lowering would put you in a distinctly non-linear region of the front wheel rate. Add to this the likelihood that aftermarket lowering springs will be stiffer than the standard parts by some arbitrary amount, whilst lowering the torsion bars at the rear has no effect on wheel rate or roll stiffness (only serving to reduce clearance to the bump stop), and you can only head in the direction of a car with increased steady state understeer, snap oversteer when the rear bump stops hit, and a ride that's been shot to f*ck. Just as there really is no replacement for displacement, there is no known disadvantage to having a decent amount of wheel stroke.

Amusingly, I've found you can have the biggest effect on the handling (well, the yaw behaviour if I'm being specific) by changing the lower engine mount. Fitting a polyurethane bung in place of the massively voided stock bush has a significant effect on the throttle adjustability, making it more linear and more reactive whilst also improving the gearshift. It also makes the car vibrate like a 1970s bus however, so fit at your own risk. I'll be drilling holes in mine to soften it off a bit.

106 gti

843 posts

211 months

Thursday 9th July 2009
quotequote all
Mines gone down 40mm and sits right and handles right , and after 4 years of standard ride height im glad ive lowered , and ive had no adverse effects from it being down .......

Nice looking car by the way ....

Thudd

3,100 posts

213 months

Thursday 9th July 2009
quotequote all
Wheels look a bit small. When do the subs and amps go in? wink

Matt_N

8,915 posts

208 months

Thursday 9th July 2009
quotequote all
Gwaredd said:
Ponk said:
Nothing wrong with subtle lowering to around -30-40mm.
Yes there is. Everything. Utter cack mod.
You better tell that to all the 106 and Saxo racers that enter these in the Caslte Combe salons then, they seem to go pretty well round there with lower than standard suspension wink

But then again, it would cost more than £100 to do it properly hehe

EvoBarry

1,903 posts

271 months

Thursday 9th July 2009
quotequote all
Track racing is different entirely though. On the road a standard 106 would kill em imo. If you were to compare the two cars that is, but that would be road racing and we don't do that.

Ponk

1,380 posts

198 months

Thursday 9th July 2009
quotequote all
Burgmeister said:
Gwaredd said:
Ponk said:
Nothing wrong with subtle lowering to around -30-40mm.
Yes there is. Everything. Utter cack mod.
It is a cack mod especially for this car.

Ponk - i reckon you're on the wrong site.
Welcoming bunch aren't you.

My 106 is lowered about 40mm with 160lb springs and uprated Bilstein(and shortened dampers) and it handles considerably better than the standard setup. I'll admit that potholes are a little less fun but the improvement when on track makes this more than bearable. I'm going to ditch this for Gaz coilovers with adjustable damping soon though as I think one of my fronts has sprung a leak.

I'll admit lowering it with aftermarket springs and standard dampers is a mistake. But sweeping statements like it will ruin the car are just stupid.


Edited by Ponk on Thursday 9th July 12:57