106 GTI or Saxo VTS?

Author
Discussion

Locke

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

190 months

Sunday 15th February 2009
quotequote all
Any real difference? Any reason to go with one rather than the other?

Locke

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

190 months

Sunday 15th February 2009
quotequote all
Apologies in advance if this thread has been started previously. coffee

Fabric 2.2

3,820 posts

198 months

Sunday 15th February 2009
quotequote all
I'd probably go with the 106 as it has less of a chav image surrounding it. And i've read they're a tad more fun.


Not sure on the 106's safety rating, but saxo's have the tendancy to act like they're made of wet tissue in any kind of large impact.

Merlot

4,121 posts

214 months

Sunday 15th February 2009
quotequote all
106 GTi. Has more heritage and looks a little better IMO.

Also, as the previous poster pointed out - less of an image issue.

Make sure it is kept completely standard looking, though! smile

wrightman90

603 posts

200 months

Sunday 15th February 2009
quotequote all
They're both fantastic cars, fast, cheap to run, etc, only the money you save buying a saxo vts will allow you to do more to the engine!

f1nn

2,693 posts

198 months

Sunday 15th February 2009
quotequote all
The pug uses their own spec rear dampers, Although at this age I doubt that offers any tangible benefit.

Saxo has better dashboard architecture, although the late spec pug gti's had a nice leather/alcantara interior.

Otherwise its a subjective thing, they are identical.

I had a VTS from new in 2003 for 3 years and loved it, there is no way on earth I would pay more for a 106 if the main concern was Image. If that sort of thing bothers you then perhaps these two cars may not be the best choice.

Easty-5

1,423 posts

196 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
In all honesty I would now buy a Saxo VTS over a 106 GTi. I had a 106 GTi for about a year and it was an excellent car (apart from reliability). They are both identical in terms of engines, suspension setup (rear beams), brakes and gearboxes. Differences, other than exterior looks are that the saxo has a better looking dash and the 106 has leather interior (Post 98 cars). The reason I'd have a VTS over a GTi is because for the same price you'd pick up a 99-00 plate GTi on 50k miles you could get an 03 plate VTS on 30k.

Jessop

435 posts

200 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
Same cars. Choose whicheer comes up cheaper of the two (usually saxo).

If your looking to tune it, make sure you get a SINGLE PLUG ecu as its generally easier to tune without major ball ache sometime down the line.

The club scene for each car is the same. I dont think genuine enthusiasts care what badge is on it. Its the same car, electrically and mechanically at the end of the day.

Good luck =]

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

214 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
wrightman90 said:
They're both fantastic cars, fast, cheap to run, etc, only the money you save buying a saxo vts will allow you to do more to the engine!
Dont they both have a same engine?

Locke

Original Poster:

1,279 posts

190 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
RobCrezz said:
wrightman90 said:
They're both fantastic cars, fast, cheap to run, etc, only the money you save buying a saxo vts will allow you to do more to the engine!
Dont they both have a same engine?
As far a i know. (which usually isn't much)

V6

3,770 posts

227 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
RobCrezz said:
wrightman90 said:
They're both fantastic cars, fast, cheap to run, etc, only the money you save buying a saxo vts will allow you to do more to the engine!
Dont they both have a same engine?
They do. The point he was making is the Saxo is cheaper than the 106 so the money you save buying the car can be spent on the engine.

Afterall every Saxo needs a K&N and a big exhaust, non?

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

214 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
V6 said:
RobCrezz said:
wrightman90 said:
They're both fantastic cars, fast, cheap to run, etc, only the money you save buying a saxo vts will allow you to do more to the engine!
Dont they both have a same engine?
They do. The point he was making is the Saxo is cheaper than the 106 so the money you save buying the car can be spent on the engine.

Afterall every Saxo needs a K&N and a big exhaust, non?
Oh yeah, whoops!

And yes, every saxo must have a fart can.

Nikko 40691

751 posts

196 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
I s'pose the VTS is a tad faster thanks to a lower weight too?

iRoll

2,335 posts

237 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
Nikko 40691 said:
I s'pose the VTS is a tad faster thanks to a lower weight too?
What makes the VTS weigh less?

wrightman90

603 posts

200 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
iRoll said:
Nikko 40691 said:
I s'pose the VTS is a tad faster thanks to a lower weight too?
What makes the VTS weigh less?
Less crash protection

Defcon5

6,281 posts

197 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
wrightman90 said:
iRoll said:
Nikko 40691 said:
I s'pose the VTS is a tad faster thanks to a lower weight too?
What makes the VTS weigh less?
Less crash protection
How so?

wrightman90

603 posts

200 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
Defcon5 said:
wrightman90 said:
iRoll said:
Nikko 40691 said:
I s'pose the VTS is a tad faster thanks to a lower weight too?
What makes the VTS weigh less?
Less crash protection
How so?
Was joking, it may just be the design layout eg. shell, dashboard- VTS- 935KG, GTI- 965KG

Nikko 40691

751 posts

196 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
wrightman90 said:
Defcon5 said:
wrightman90 said:
iRoll said:
Nikko 40691 said:
I s'pose the VTS is a tad faster thanks to a lower weight too?
What makes the VTS weigh less?
Less crash protection
How so?
Was joking, it may just be the design layout eg. shell, dashboard- VTS- 935KG, GTI- 965KG
The leather seats in the GTI adds weight.

castrolcraig

18,073 posts

212 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
has to be a 106 gti.

iRoll

2,335 posts

237 months

Monday 16th February 2009
quotequote all
Nikko 40691 said:
wrightman90 said:
Defcon5 said:
wrightman90 said:
iRoll said:
Nikko 40691 said:
I s'pose the VTS is a tad faster thanks to a lower weight too?
What makes the VTS weigh less?
Less crash protection
How so?
Was joking, it may just be the design layout eg. shell, dashboard- VTS- 935KG, GTI- 965KG
The leather seats in the GTI adds weight.
30kg though?? Blimey.