Fisher Fury, impuse buy!

Fisher Fury, impuse buy!

Author
Discussion

BS9ider

52 posts

115 months

Saturday 30th September 2023
quotequote all
Zephyr Speedshop said:
BS9ider said:
Great project, look forward to reading more. That 131 gearbox is bomb proof, I've installed the same in my 124.
Got a thread? I do like classic fiat !
I haven't but happy to create one if of interest

Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Saturday 30th September 2023
quotequote all
BS9ider said:
Zephyr Speedshop said:
BS9ider said:
Great project, look forward to reading more. That 131 gearbox is bomb proof, I've installed the same in my 124.
Got a thread? I do like classic fiat !
I haven't but happy to create one if of interest
You Can't have interest if theres no tread buddy biglaugh

Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Saturday 30th September 2023
quotequote all
Cracking little drive out this morning. My local alignment guy has moved jobs, and the garage was 'fully booked' Chris would definitely have squeezed me in biglaugh so I went over to denmead tyres. Who I knew wouldn't freakout about doing it.

After Abit of a faff trying to find something suitable to list it as. (Computer says no!) Turns out it's a 1973 cortina biglaugh



Much better now. I have alot more confidence in the turnin now was it seemed twitchy before not sure if that's a placebo effect or a real.



Decided to calibrate the Speedo as one of the guys on the group was able to point me in the right direction. You have to give pin 12 a 12v connection to start the gauge in configuration mode. I've got it dialled now but it's still abit all over the place. Very tempted to get a GPS based one.

Behind the dash is abit of a state. Leading me more towards stand alone management.



Got some time to inspect the engine. And I'm pretty confident it's a turbo lump as there's a map sensor as well as the turbo Manifold. I've asked the twin cam Group to help identify it for sure.


Pretty sure that's a low comp piston.

No idea if that's a fruity cam or not?

If it is a turbo lump the cost of getting it to a reasonable compression to run NA will far out way just bolting a turbo on it. I'd prefer it to be an na screamer, but I may as well go down the road I've been delt.

Mr Tidy

22,993 posts

130 months

Saturday 30th September 2023
quotequote all
I can see the appeal of an N/A screamer as these Fiat twin-cams really work well like that.

But then again if it is a turbo I don't remember anyone complaining about the engine in Integrales!

Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Saturday 30th September 2023
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
I can see the appeal of an N/A screamer as these Fiat twin-cams really work well like that.

But then again if it is a turbo I don't remember anyone complaining about the engine in Integrales!
A good engine is good engine even when boosted ! Maybe a super charger gives me that hight rpm setup I want and I've never done a super charger before.


Yazza54

18,891 posts

184 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
I don't have any specific knowledge of this engine but that cam looks like what you'd expect for boost, very pointy profile.

BS9ider

52 posts

115 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
Can you see the casting number on the block? I think the Delta series started 831 and Beta 138 or 828. There's lots of info in the Guy Croft book including all the casting numbers of the various Fiat/Lancia blocks and heads

Regbuser

3,859 posts

38 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
Engine codes for the Lampretti series >

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_Twin_Cam_engi...


Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
Cheers guys. One of the chaps on the FB group, has identified it as a 1.6ie NA engine. However there some discussion on whether that's a dished turbo piston. Although I think it looks domed ?



Can't find any numbers on the head, but if it is running low compression pistons I doubt it would even make 80bhp with out a turbo on it.

andburg

7,422 posts

172 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
Is the simple answer just run a compression test?

BS9ider

52 posts

115 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
The Fiat 1756 in the 124 produced for export to California was low compression with flat pistons, air injection, 4/1 manifold, small carb and catalytic converter. That was rated at 86hp. So your 1600 should be well north of that.

You might find the engine number stamped above the oil filter housing.

Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
andburg said:
Is the simple answer just run a compression test?
biglaugh I'm actually an idiot! That's a very good shout. biglaugh

Edited by Zephyr Speedshop on Sunday 1st October 20:59

Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
BS9ider said:
The Fiat 1756 in the 124 produced for export to California was low compression with flat pistons, air injection, 4/1 manifold, small carb and catalytic converter. That was rated at 86hp. So your 1600 should be well north of that.

You might find the engine number stamped above the oil filter housing.
I'm pretty confident it's a delta 1.6 IE NA engine which should be 106bhp. However if it's been fitted with turbo pistons I will be really low comp. Even in cooking na trim there only 9.1 biglaugh

However I'm 99% it has these pistons in


You can see the valve cutaways in my endoscope photo.

So as a minimum I have a stock delta Na 1.6 Twincam



Edited by Zephyr Speedshop on Sunday 1st October 21:00

Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
Im loving it, it's really really fun to drive. Starting to get abit of confidence with it now it's aligned it feels the same in both directions. And it's quite progressive towards the limit. Plenty of warning it's stepping out on throttle. Closest feeling I can think of is a go kart with a locked axel. Is definitely slightly sideways or on the edge but is totally manageable.



I'm really going to have to help him with the Mustang . It's really not a happy bunny. Hot Start issues doest change gear when it should. Right hand bank puffs blue smoke. And stalls in reverse or low speed manoeuvres.

It is freaking cool tho.



I've no clue what's up with me I still can't decide if the fury is fast or not ? Can do a double overtake with no dramas. But just doesn't give me the feeling of acceleration. My pug pulls way harder in gear. But maybe this is just so liner you don't feel it.
It's also not helped by everything feeling fast as it's so raw.

Still loads Todo but it's a freaking riot to drive. And the wheels are growing on me. But I still think some miniltes or similar would be better suited.

Mr Tidy

22,993 posts

130 months

Sunday 1st October 2023
quotequote all
Fiat group made so many variations of Lampredi twin-cams. They even did 2 litre ones with superchargers in the Beta Volumex Coupe and HPE.

If yours is a 1.6 from a Delta with Turbo pistons maybe it's from a Delta HF Turbo?

But any 1.6 ought to be 90bhp at least, which should still be fun in something as light as your Fisher!

Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
Fiat group made so many variations of Lampredi twin-cams. They even did 2 litre ones with superchargers in the Beta Volumex Coupe and HPE.

If yours is a 1.6 from a Delta with Turbo pistons maybe it's from a Delta HF Turbo?

But any 1.6 ought to be 90bhp at least, which should still be fun in something as light as your Fisher!
im pretty confident that its, a N/A engine now. i thing the endoscope photos just confused a few people as they do look dished. but they look like the right pistons the even have the flat valve recceses on.

if it is making its quoted 106 bhp . then that would make it 176bhp per ton (it doesnt feel like this to me, but i think its very linier in the power delivery). i think i wants to be nearer the 300 bhp per ton mark to feel properly fast. and stay drivable. to put that in perspective it would need to be 180 bhp to achevie that . and 120 bhp is 200bhp per ton. the turbo 205 was 263 per tone and my 208 is 216.

so i really think the tiwn cam is a viable engine. with stand alone with electronic ignition and itb's i think its realistic to get it into the 120/130 mark. just letting it rev, will help as it feels like it wants to pull past the limiter. the guy croft book suggests the 1.6 is happy reving up to 8k rpm. id feel alot happier if it had at least uprated rod bolts for that. current rpm limit is 6.5k from the original weber ecu.

further down the line a set of cams and a ported and mayble mildly decked. would make it abit of a ripper. without braking the bank, or having to put somthing else into it.

Mark-insert old BMW

16,282 posts

176 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
If you were looking for something cheap, an M44/1.9 twin cam from a BMW Z3 or Compact can be had for less than £200 and are pretty bulletproof. I stuck some S54 ITB's and DTA on mine. smile


Jhonno

5,845 posts

144 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Zephyr Speedshop said:
I'm really going to have to help him with the Mustang . It's really not a happy bunny. Hot Start issues doest change gear when it should. Right hand bank puffs blue smoke. And stalls in reverse or low speed manoeuvres.

It is freaking cool tho.

Sounds like back to basics.. Start with timing (check timing marks/tdc etc) and work through to the carb.

And yes it is very cool. I am biased though.

AW111

9,674 posts

136 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Zephyr Speedshop said:
im pretty confident that its, a N/A engine now. i thing the endoscope photos just confused a few people as they do look dished. but they look like the right pistons the even have the flat valve recceses on.

if it is making its quoted 106 bhp . then that would make it 176bhp per ton (it doesnt feel like this to me, but i think its very linier in the power delivery). i think i wants to be nearer the 300 bhp per ton mark to feel properly fast. and stay drivable. to put that in perspective it would need to be 180 bhp to achevie that . and 120 bhp is 200bhp per ton. the turbo 205 was 263 per tone and my 208 is 216.

so i really think the tiwn cam is a viable engine. with stand alone with electronic ignition and itb's i think its realistic to get it into the 120/130 mark. just letting it rev, will help as it feels like it wants to pull past the limiter. the guy croft book suggests the 1.6 is happy reving up to 8k rpm. id feel alot happier if it had at least uprated rod bolts for that. current rpm limit is 6.5k from the original weber ecu.

further down the line a set of cams and a ported and mayble mildly decked. would make it abit of a ripper. without braking the bank, or having to put somthing else into it.
I navigate a rally car powered by a Lampredi twincam in FIAT guise.
It's a 1750 on twin weber downdrafts, and is good for about 130 bhp, if my memory serves.
They do need to rev.

Zephyr Speedshop

Original Poster:

2,251 posts

157 months

Tuesday 3rd October 2023
quotequote all
Mark-insert old BMW said:
If you were looking for something cheap, an M44/1.9 twin cam from a BMW Z3 or Compact can be had for less than £200 and are pretty bulletproof. I stuck some S54 ITB's and DTA on mine. smile

be a fun little lump ive had a 318is with a m44. but it flows the wrong way so would be a bit of a job to fit. not impossible tho . but be way easier to put a zetec in for similar power and way more aftermarket parts.