Singapore Night Race
Author
Discussion

Puddenchucker

Original Poster:

5,846 posts

247 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
So, apart from novelty value and not having to get up at 7am on a Sunday to watch it live, what did we gain from having an F1 race under floodlights?

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

255 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
I didn't like watching it, particularly - it was just grey/white/grey/white; I'd have much rather had proper big lights fitted to the cars, Le Mans-style.


Eric Mc

125,609 posts

294 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
There was no intention of any "gains" from this - apart from ensuring bigger TV audiences in Europe whilst at the same time satisfying Bernie's lust for even more money.

On the whole, loathe though I am to say it, the idea did seem to work and a generally "entertaining" contest ensued. I still have grave reservations over the safety aspects of night racing and am sure that rain will be a major worry if and when the race coincides with some wet weather.

It was good to be able to see sparks and exhaust flames again although Brundle's prediction that we'd see glowing disc brakes didn't quite happen. Why was that, I wonder?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

303 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
There was no intention of any "gains" from this - apart from ensuring bigger TV audiences in Europe whilst at the same time satisfying Bernie's lust for even more money.

On the whole, loathe though I am to say it, the idea did seem to work and a generally "entertaining" contest ensued. I still have grave reservations over the safety aspects of night racing and am sure that rain will be a major worry if and when the race coincides with some wet weather.

It was good to be able to see sparks and exhaust flames again although Brundle's prediction that we'd see glowing disc brakes didn't quite happen. Why was that, I wonder?
agree with that...

would have been better if the track had been a decent one, but there was no real racing as such and the camera angles were severly limited

Xaero

4,063 posts

244 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
I think it would be best if it was kept novelty once every few years, it'll wear out if it was done every year.


crossle

1,520 posts

280 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Brundle's prediction that we'd see glowing disc brakes didn't quite happen. Why was that, I wonder?
I don't think any of the camera angles were low enough to see far enough through the wheels?

I guess that's because of the horrible high concrete walls all around the circuit.

garycat

5,382 posts

239 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It was good to be able to see sparks and exhaust flames again although Brundle's prediction that we'd see glowing disc brakes didn't quite happen. Why was that, I wonder?
Because all the teams now use those wheel covers (you know, the moveable aerodynamic devices that Ferrari introduced)

phumy

5,827 posts

266 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
garycat said:
Eric Mc said:
It was good to be able to see sparks and exhaust flames again although Brundle's prediction that we'd see glowing disc brakes didn't quite happen. Why was that, I wonder?
Because all the teams now use those wheel covers (you know, the moveable aerodynamic devices that Ferrari introduced)
But they all took those wheel covers off, except one team, ISTR


crossle

1,520 posts

280 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
garycat said:
Eric Mc said:
It was good to be able to see sparks and exhaust flames again although Brundle's prediction that we'd see glowing disc brakes didn't quite happen. Why was that, I wonder?
Because all the teams now use those wheel covers (you know, the moveable aerodynamic devices that Ferrari introduced)
Only on the front wheels. One ferrari had them on yesterday, the other didn't, at one stage.

Piglet

6,250 posts

284 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
We discussed this briefly on the race thread yesterday.

Given the design of the circuit it was always unlikely that there would be an accessible marshals post on that part of the circuit because of the concrete walls and the spectator fencing. It's a bit like the pit straight at Rockingham.

What I don't understand is why they didn't get a FD (Fast Doctor) car to him quicker, we saw what appeared to be a med car being deployed with the saftey car, I think from the pit exit (might be wrong - where was the safety car deployed from?) and if so that had to do a lap to get to him but there must have been FD cars closer to him, they should be all around the circuit.

Most marshals know that drivers often have enough adreneline to get out of the car, but if they are injured it doesn't always get them very far. A driver running across the track unassisted, even under safety car, scares me.