Silverstone Re-re surfacing June 2019
Discussion
shost said:
Who else things this is a huge fail from Silverstone?
Imagine Wimbledon closing in July to re turf the court?
It would be even more of a fail to not do something about it after the events of last year. Two club meetings have had to be moved so it's hardly the end of the world.Imagine Wimbledon closing in July to re turf the court?
I was at a club meeting towards the end of last season which was cancelled due to rain. A lot of very angry people - not because of the weather, I've seen worse, but the fact was that it just wasn't draining off, plus a lot of prevarication from officials before deciding to call it a day.
andrewcliffe said:
I was at a club meeting towards the end of last season which was cancelled due to rain. A lot of very angry people - not because of the weather, I've seen worse, but the fact was that it just wasn't draining off, plus a lot of prevarication from officials before deciding to call it a day.
If it was any later in the year than the last weekend in August then I’m amazed anybody could generate any emotion other than weary resignation to the inevitable, and the same applies to losing dates this year...Well this is my point. Its not like it doesn't rain much in Northamptonshire. They had the whole off season to investigate it and sort it surely. Regardless of what the FIM said.
Two club meets and I presume several trackdays. I've had one moved to July. Fortunately I'm still able to attend but plenty of others won't. The TDO Porsche Club GB weren't given much notice.
Brands is fully booked out during the summer months so I'm also thinking they must be losing out hugely on the associated revenue.
Surely no one assumed it would just be alright after MotoGP?
Two club meets and I presume several trackdays. I've had one moved to July. Fortunately I'm still able to attend but plenty of others won't. The TDO Porsche Club GB weren't given much notice.
Brands is fully booked out during the summer months so I'm also thinking they must be losing out hugely on the associated revenue.
Surely no one assumed it would just be alright after MotoGP?
Edited by shost on Wednesday 13th March 21:53
The tarmac company are capable of laying a surface. They are one of the biggest.
However the weather conditions at the time of laying last year were far from ideal. Realistically they shouldn't have started.
It's a shame for the club and hopefully they can be supported to find new venues. But they really cannot risk losing premier races as they're the only thing that makes them money.
However the weather conditions at the time of laying last year were far from ideal. Realistically they shouldn't have started.
It's a shame for the club and hopefully they can be supported to find new venues. But they really cannot risk losing premier races as they're the only thing that makes them money.
I don't know anything about the deal with MotoGP but my understanding is that it costs Silverstone a huge amount to run F1 there.
Still, I'm sure the costs of breaching their contracts with any of the big events were enough to ensure binning a few club/trackdays events wasn't a big deal.
Still, I'm sure the costs of breaching their contracts with any of the big events were enough to ensure binning a few club/trackdays events wasn't a big deal.
joema said:
The tarmac company are capable of laying a surface. They are one of the biggest.
However the weather conditions at the time of laying last year were far from ideal. Realistically they shouldn't have started.
It's a shame for the club and hopefully they can be supported to find new venues. But they really cannot risk losing premier races as they're the only thing that makes them money.
Best in the business apparently. They are quite unlucky with these things though because the rush to surface the extended track in 2009? Coincided with one of the coldest winters on record, resulting in a bumpy surface. However the weather conditions at the time of laying last year were far from ideal. Realistically they shouldn't have started.
It's a shame for the club and hopefully they can be supported to find new venues. But they really cannot risk losing premier races as they're the only thing that makes them money.
Steve H said:
I don't know anything about the deal with MotoGP but my understanding is that it costs Silverstone a huge amount to run F1 there.
Still, I'm sure the costs of breaching their contracts with any of the big events were enough to ensure binning a few club/trackdays events wasn't a big deal.
Silverstone orignally turned down the opportunity to renew Motogp as it didnt make money.Still, I'm sure the costs of breaching their contracts with any of the big events were enough to ensure binning a few club/trackdays events wasn't a big deal.
They then sat back, allowed the Circuit of
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff