essex V6 - up to the job?
essex V6 - up to the job?
Author
Discussion

robgte

Original Poster:

46 posts

222 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
Now my Scimitar GTE (Essex 3.0 V6) is up and running (and 4 sale) I find myself feeling that the performance is only adequate and certain not sporting by modern standard, fair enough it is an auto which wont help

But I want my Taimar (barn find currently non runner) to be a fast car by modern standard eg 6.5 secs or less to 0-60 mph, can I get this expect this of performance out of an essex V6 at a reasonable cost and still have a motor you cold live with on a day a to day basis? I would add I have never driven a Taimar so have no real feel for what to expect. Restoration will be starting shortly when my Scimitar is sold.

Regards
Rob

heightswitch

6,322 posts

266 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
The Essex tractor lump is an old asmatic wheezer deffo not up to the job;)

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NbXBSLRvgHU

N.

heightswitch

6,322 posts

266 months

Friday 27th June 2008
quotequote all
These guys turn out a nice essex for reasonable money.

http://www.essexengines.com/

N.

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

207 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
heightswitch said:
These guys turn out a nice essex for reasonable money.

http://www.essexengines.com/

N.
They just dont seem interseted in discussing what they produce. Got quite wound up with them trying to assertain the relative merits of their engines.

Maybe the guy was having a worse day than me at the time. (ps Neil, I didn't buy a 3.4 from them....or anyone else for that matter)wink

heightswitch

6,322 posts

266 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
TVR_owner said:
heightswitch said:
These guys turn out a nice essex for reasonable money.

http://www.essexengines.com/

N.
They just dont seem interseted in discussing what they produce. Got quite wound up with them trying to assertain the relative merits of their engines.

Maybe the guy was having a worse day than me at the time. (ps Neil, I didn't buy a 3.4 from them....or anyone else for that matter)wink
You just don't talk lancashire like what I do.
I know of a very nice engine built by these guys that has raced for about 4 seasons now and never missed a beat.

N.

TVR_owner

3,349 posts

207 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
heightswitch said:
TVR_owner said:
heightswitch said:
These guys turn out a nice essex for reasonable money.

http://www.essexengines.com/

N.
They just dont seem interseted in discussing what they produce. Got quite wound up with them trying to assertain the relative merits of their engines.

Maybe the guy was having a worse day than me at the time. (ps Neil, I didn't buy a 3.4 from them....or anyone else for that matter)wink
You just don't talk lancashire like what I do.
I know of a very nice engine built by these guys that has raced for about 4 seasons now and never missed a beat.

N.
I think I know the engine of which you speak - the folk even suggested I get advice from him on what he'd had done confused

Some shots of the Red Shed Progress here. http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Edited by TVR_owner on Saturday 28th June 12:41

robgte

Original Poster:

46 posts

222 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
heightswitch said:
These guys turn out a nice essex for reasonable money.

http://www.essexengines.com/

N.
Thanks - What do you consider reasonable money and will it get me modern performance levels e.g. to 60mph in 6.5secs or less.

On a more general note is a standard Taimar/3000M quite fast in standard tune?

Regards
Rob
smile

heightswitch

6,322 posts

266 months

Saturday 28th June 2008
quotequote all
robgte said:
heightswitch said:
These guys turn out a nice essex for reasonable money.

http://www.essexengines.com/

N.
Thanks - What do you consider reasonable money and will it get me modern performance levels e.g. to 60mph in 6.5secs or less.

On a more general note is a standard Taimar/3000M quite fast in standard tune?

Regards
Rob
smile
Prices are all on the website Rob also all the dyno results for various engine / carb packages.
N.

DavidY

4,489 posts

300 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Robgte

A few years ago I had a modified Taimar, that would have met your performance requirements. I would have estimated that it would have comfortably met your 0-60 time but the real performance was in the 30-90mph band where on one occassion it out accelerated my (235bhp) Impreza Turbo being driven by my wife, who was not known for being slow being an airline pilot (and Griff500) at the time!

I reckon that my car was pushing out around 200bhp (It was rolling roaded at 160bhp at the wheels but not in it's final configuration). To help you the mods were:-

Powermax High Compression Pistions, Fully Balanced bottom End, Vulcan Big Valve Head with matched inlet manifold and Weber 40DFI with Custom K&N filter, all carefully put together by a guy who built Essex Egines up for the Hartwell Rally Capris in the 70's. I would have thought that it was similar to a Group A Cari Spec of the 70's

I also have a remote oil filter assembly and one of Adrian Venn's bigger radiators

But a real power gain came when I fitted a Tony Law Bunch of Banana Manifold and Exhaust YSstem to the car, the id range punch increased dramtically. Contact GAjon for details on this.

A Taimer can easily be made quick even with the 'old' tractor engine, but personally I feel that you must also uprate the suspension and for piece of mind, the brakes. Also moving to a larger wheel diamter offers more choice of modern performance rubber.

Unfortunately after I sold my car, I understand it was written off, I know some parts have appeared on other cars, but I don't know what happened to the engine.

Alternatively if you want a very quick Essex Engine then you could go for a Adrian Venn Modified Turbo or mad engine like GAjon!

I know that heightswitch seems to 'hate' the Essex Engine with a passion, but it can be good (and reliable), I did approx 30k miles in mine after the rebuild with about 4000 on track, before any significant work was required). Transplants don't always work well in a M chassis as the upper chassis rails are two close/height up together and at the wrong height for many V8's

davidy


robgte

Original Poster:

46 posts

222 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Thanks - that's the sort of info I was after. Out of interest did that fire breathin dragon run with a standard 4 speed box?

I may have a word with John Wade about getting my current engine rebuilt to a decent spec. He seems to know his onions and is a perfectionist (with assocated cost). Progress is somewhat hampered currently due to chronic lack of space in garage - I have 3 cars stored in what is fundemantally a large 2 car garage - I can barely get a feeler guage in there let alone restore a 30 year old car. My Scimitar will be going soon with any luck - which will free up space and generate a bit of cash to throw down another bottomless pit!

Regards
Rob

Edited by robgte on Sunday 29th June 12:47

DavidY

4,489 posts

300 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
robgte

Yes, it was the original 4 speed box (refreshed at the same time as engine build). I kept to the 4 speeder as it made the car legal for sprinting/hillclimbing, though this restriction seeems to be fairly widely abused in the 'Modified Road Going Class'!

davidy

thegamekeeper

2,282 posts

298 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
David, the Ledas were revalved and are on my Grantura and the brakes are in a cupboard in my garage. rest of car seems to have gone "underground"


When the Essex engine was current and Ford Capris were winning everything in racing the top engine builders were Swaymar. The 2 owners of Swaymar were "bought out" by Richard Williams to build his Aston race engines. They still do Essex engines and some superb parts. They know more about tuning these engines than most but as with all good things the best is never the cheapest


The fundamental problem with the engine is it doesn,t breath very well (that is why the turbos were so quick, they had it rammed down their throats). It was originally designed to be a diesel engine which explains why everything is so heavyweight. The key to getting any performance from it revolves around the valve lift, anything below 0.4 inch produces an astmatic engine which runs out of puff at about 3500 rpm. There are plenty of good cams around nowadays including some very good ground from blanks from the above. The general wisdom is that it would be an awesome engine if you put the carbs on the exhaust ports and the exhaust out of the inlet ports!!

Edited by thegamekeeper on Sunday 29th June 14:17

DavidY

4,489 posts

300 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
gamekeeper

And the Wheels/Tyres are on a V8 M.

But I had heard that the car was written off. Doesn't matter to me now, but it would be nice to know. I changed the plate shortly before selling and I can't for the life of me remember what the new plate was (complete brain fade)

davidy

heightswitch

6,322 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
DavidY said:
Robgte


I know that heightswitch seems to 'hate' the Essex Engine with a passion,

davidy
Far from it David.
just an in joke between myself and a couple of mates.
Nwink



Edited by heightswitch on Sunday 29th June 15:42

DavidY

4,489 posts

300 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Neil

I should have put a smiley in too, as I put 'hate' in quotes assuming that it would ('might') be taken in jest

All the best

davidy

heightswitch

6,322 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
DavidY said:
Neil

I should have put a smiley in too, as I put 'hate' in quotes assuming that it would ('might') be taken in jest

All the best

davidy
Its a serious business is engine choice david. Everyone Knows that an Essex Tractor lump only truly becomes a good boat anchor when an extra 2 cylinders are added to the back of itwink Just closed the garage for the day: smile

N.













DavidY

4,489 posts

300 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Neil

Don't disagree, however you can't fit one of those easily to an M series chassis. I know it's been done (Dave Smith 302 in an S) but its not trivial and the exhaust flow is severely restricted due to the upper chassis rail being at the same height as the outlets.

Nice work BTW, hope to see it on track along with TVR_owner (daftlad) proper racing M at some point

davidy

heightswitch

6,322 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
DavidY said:
Neil

Don't disagree, however you can't fit one of those easily to an M series chassis. I know it's been done (Dave Smith 302 in an S) but its not trivial and the exhaust flow is severely restricted due to the upper chassis rail being at the same height as the outlets.

Nice work BTW, hope to see it on track along with TVR_owner (daftlad) proper racing M at some point

davidy
I always thought the M and Thurner chassis were broadly similar in terms of main member heights David.
A 289 / 302 is a much simpler prospect than a Rover due to its relatively narrow top end. Not that any of it is simple mind you. One day I will build a 5000M when I find a suitable pre 73 car.

I hope John hits the Anglesey deadline. Mine is looking like a pipe dream for that event so I will assume my usual spannering role for Geoff. I will be out hopefully before the year end. It seems that all the simple detail jobs now turn into half a day each.

N.

thegamekeeper

2,282 posts

298 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
Neil, why dont you buld a 5 litre "M" chassied Tuscan/Vixen. I know where all the parts required are and all at a very reasonable price.

heightswitch

6,322 posts

266 months

Sunday 29th June 2008
quotequote all
thegamekeeper said:
Neil, why dont you buld a 5 litre "M" chassied Tuscan/Vixen. I know where all the parts required are and all at a very reasonable price.
One day. After the next 2 projects or after my divorce whichever comes firstwink
N.