Vixen diff ratios

Vixen diff ratios

Author
Discussion

Monkeythree

Original Poster:

514 posts

236 months

Tuesday 26th September 2017
quotequote all
My Vixen is still running the 3.89:1 Triumph differential that it had when it was new and had 89 Bhp. But now it is running ~125 BHp I feel it would benefit from gearing it down a bit.

I want to keep the differential casing/mounting "original" i.e. Maintaining the existing chassis mounts so this means my options are either 3.63:1 or 3.27:1. Does anyone have any experience of running a modified Vixen with either of these final drive options?

RCK974X

2,521 posts

156 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
Depends where the 125bhp is in the rev range..... On the basis it's the original 1600 Kent, then you don't want to go to a 3.27 as engine will rev much less....
especially with 15 inch rims....probably spend most of its time 'off the cam' . 3.63 might be better, depending where you drive.

As a side example, when I built my Marlin (kit car) with a tuned Triumph 2500 lump, the 3.27 was perfect, as it's a long stroke engine and car is fairly light, so
was a good choice. In a 2500 Vixen with 15 inch rims the overall gearing with the TR6 3.45:1 would be about the same as my Marlin for 3.27 with 13 inch rims.
I reckon this would be a bit 'tall' for a 1600 Kent engine.

You can calc engine RPM versus road speed quite easily - I can tell you how.... ask if you want to know.

OTOH, you might consider a T9 5 speeder, it's a straight fit to the engine, I think it's the same length as the 4 speed box, not sure, but it should be pretty easy, perhaps have to shorten the propshaft though. But not if you want to stay original, obviously.

Edited by RCK974X on Wednesday 27th September 02:15

Moto

1,261 posts

260 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
Is this for track, road or a bit of both?

Moto

Dollyman1850

6,319 posts

257 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
The horsepower isn't so much of a factor if the engine cannot develop torque to pull the engine with higher ratio and / or you cannot physically rev the engine higher with a higher RPM Limit

I have had a 3.64 and 3.92 with 5 speed in dads Zetec Vixen and in my opinion the 3.92 could actually do with being a bit lower to suit the engine (136hp at the wheels) With the 3.64 fitted the engine would be strong in 1st, 2nd from a standstill but would tail off in 3rd and struggle to make revs at all in 4th. 5th was very overdriven and in the real world you would be constantly dropping to 4th from 5th even on slight slopes. The 3.92 is much better and for more performance with the BGH Geartech box (long 1st gear) the car would be even better with something like a 4:1 ratio.

In my opinion with a 4 sp you should leave well alone. If you want more relaxed cruising then install a 5sp, preferably with long 1st because the std 5sp has a very very low 1st gear.

As it stands the 3.92 is the best diff for the 2.0 engine with approx 160hp (flywheel)

I am sure others can work out what the max theoretical speed would be with a 225/60/15 rear wheel, 7500 rev limit and 1:1 4th gear then a .88 overdriven 5th

N.

Edited by Dollyman1850 on Wednesday 27th September 19:18

vicankim

40 posts

172 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
I always wondered why my Vixen seamed sluggish even allowing for the current standard build engine. Then I had to have the differential rebuilt last year due to oil seal problems. The guy that rebuilt it pointed out that it was a 3.63 and not the expected 3.89. A previous owner has also advised that the car ran a modified engine at one time and would max out the speedometer with ease. From memory, it pulls 3000 rpm at 70 mph.

So 3.63 with a sensibly modified engine and standard 4 speed were in my thoughts as the way to go for a decent road spec. Understand that the 3.63 is quite rare, particularly with the HD spec used by TVR. Somebody on here will know what the HD bit is; something to do with the bearing supports maybe?

Steve





Edited by vicankim on Wednesday 27th September 20:52

pete.reeve

516 posts

290 months

Wednesday 27th September 2017
quotequote all
I will be running a 4.5 next year but it does rev to 9000.biggrin I think you can still get a 3.6.

Pete

Dollyman1850

6,319 posts

257 months

Thursday 28th September 2017
quotequote all
pete.reeve said:
I will be running a 4.5 next year but it does rev to 9000.biggrin I think you can still get a 3.6.

Pete
Back with a Vengeance Pete biggrin Good news. Its been all too quiet lately.

timelord

318 posts

290 months

Thursday 28th September 2017
quotequote all
Had a 4.1 diff in my 1600M for a while, used to run out of revs in top. Using a 3.89 in my vixen with a 5 speed box, standard 1st gear is too short and 5th a bit too long, running just off the cam, 234 Kent, at 60/70 mph have to drop to 4th on hills. Geoff

Monkeythree

Original Poster:

514 posts

236 months

Thursday 28th September 2017
quotequote all
Thanks to everyone for their inputs. I've decided to stick with the 3.89 and enjoy the acceleration!