Lotus 7 replicas, which manufacturer?

Lotus 7 replicas, which manufacturer?

Author
Discussion

mikey g

Original Poster:

4,784 posts

247 months

Wednesday 28th April 2004
quotequote all
How many people do these kits?!?!
Obviously you have Caterham and Westfield but what about the others in comparison?
Robin hood?
Tiger?
Locost?
Stuart Taylor?
Any i dont know about?

I'm looking to do the usual hill climbs and sprints as well as track days plus a little weekend fun on local welsh roads

Help appreciated

Mike

Martin_S

9,939 posts

252 months

Wednesday 28th April 2004
quotequote all
I'm going to get a lot of stick for this, I know, but IMHO, you're better off sticking with only a handful of manufacturers if you want a competitive trackday/competition weapon as well as just a pleasant weekend toy.

Caterham and Westfield you have already identified. Sylva and Sylva derivatives are extremely competitive and very good value for money. Dax is well designed and fairly well developed, if a little on the big side.

All the rest are either second-rate in design terms, or too low-volume to have proven themselves one way or the other.

Wacky Racer

38,998 posts

254 months

Wednesday 28th April 2004
quotequote all
Martin_S said:
I'm going to get a lot of stick for this, I know, but IMHO, you're better off sticking with only a handful of manufacturers if you want a competitive trackday/competition weapon as well as just a pleasant weekend toy.

Caterham and Westfield you have already identified. Sylva and Sylva derivatives are extremely competitive and very good value for money. Dax is well designed and fairly well developed, if a little on the big side.

All the rest are either second-rate in design terms, or too low-volume to have proven themselves one way or the other.




Errr, you forgot Tiger, , makers of the fastest accelerating sports car in the world!!! 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, with over fifteen years design development behind it......

busa_rush

6,930 posts

258 months

Wednesday 28th April 2004
quotequote all
Regarding the Dax Rush being a bit big, it's only really big compared to a Cateringvan or a locost type book chassis. I found that I couldn't fit in a Caterham so the Dax was a pleasant surprise.

I think the Tiger B6 and R6 are similar to a Dax although it was sometime ago that I drove one so memory could be fading !

The Luego is the biggest 7 type I've seen, almost big enough for four seats !

mikey g

Original Poster:

4,784 posts

247 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
Whatever i get i'm looking at fitting a bike engine in at some time.
What i really need to do is find a couple i can get in and look at properly, may take a trip to Westfield and see if i can get a test drive

Liszt

4,330 posts

277 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
Dax do a mental 777bhp per tonne BEC.

They also have a trick front suspension set up which is the dogs danglies.

Tiger are well known for their BEC developments but the cockpit is a bit small for me.

Birkin is an excellent quality product but fairly new here. It is a South African company.

IMHO, Caterham and Westfield, while fine motors suffer from being too expensive and lacking in development that the other companies have been putting in.

But I am biased as I get my Rush chassis next month!

docevi1

10,430 posts

255 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
whats a BEC please?

Alex

9,975 posts

291 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
docevi1 said:
whats a BEC please?


Bike-engined car.

Alex

9,975 posts

291 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
Robin Hood is cheap, but big and heavy and although it looks like one, is not really a Seven.

The best at the cheaper end (Locost) of the market are Stuart Taylor and MK Engineering. Stuart Taylor also own the rights to the Phoenix now too.

Stuart Taylor probably have more experience than anyone of fitting bike engines to Sevens.

docevi1

10,430 posts

255 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
Alex said:
docevi1 said:
whats a BEC please?
Bike-engined car.


I thought it something like that, but couldn't figure it out. Thanks.

777bhp/tonne

anonymous-user

61 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
I'd be interested to hear if anyone's got any opinions of the Quantum Cyclone.

I saw the cut-away one at Stafford and it certainly caught my eye. Monocoque chassis, inboard front suspension (a la Sylva/Raw Striker)...

Personally if I were going for a kit for BEC motorsport use, I'd take a good long look at the Fisher Fury. Doesn't look like a se7en, but take a look at the 750MC RGB championship results for the past few seasons...

Wacky Racer

38,998 posts

254 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
What you REALLY need is one of these.....


www.pilbeamracing.co.uk/

Rickbrown74

250 posts

249 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
[redacted]

stone

1,538 posts

254 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:

Martin_S said:
I'm going to get a lot of stick for this, I know, but IMHO, you're better off sticking with only a handful of manufacturers if you want a competitive trackday/competition weapon as well as just a pleasant weekend toy.

Caterham and Westfield you have already identified. Sylva and Sylva derivatives are extremely competitive and very good value for money. Dax is well designed and fairly well developed, if a little on the big side.

All the rest are either second-rate in design terms, or too low-volume to have proven themselves one way or the other.





Errr, you forgot Tiger, , makers of the fastest accelerating sports car in the world!!! 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, with over fifteen years design development behind it......


I thought that was a Z-cars special built on a Westfield chassis. He then engineered changes for the Tiger and sold on the design!!

stone

1,538 posts

254 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
Slightly off topic but I notice that Robin Hood cars is up for sale at the moment!

Martin_S

9,939 posts

252 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:

Martin_S said:
I'm going to get a lot of stick for this, I know, but IMHO, you're better off sticking with only a handful of manufacturers if you want a competitive trackday/competition weapon as well as just a pleasant weekend toy.

Caterham and Westfield you have already identified. Sylva and Sylva derivatives are extremely competitive and very good value for money. Dax is well designed and fairly well developed, if a little on the big side.

All the rest are either second-rate in design terms, or too low-volume to have proven themselves one way or the other.





Errr, you forgot Tiger, , makers of the fastest accelerating sports car in the world!!! 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, with over fifteen years design development behind it......


No, I didn't forget them - I was merely trying to be polite by not naming specific manufacturers. The twin engined Z-cars Tiger is neither representative of the breed, or a well handling car, from what I've heard. Sure, it's fast in a straight line, but then so is anything weighing less than a ton if you bolt a couple of 150bhp bike engines into it and gear it low enough. Chris Allanson's background is grass-trackers, and it shows. His grasp of suspension and handling is rudimentary to say the least - anyone see his trailing arm BEC conversion of the Smart on display at this years Autosports show? And the Smart is a car that needs a computer to stop it falling over even with a properly designed suspension set-up...

'Normal' Tigers are rather heavily built, have design shortcomings which are glaringly obvious even from cursory inspection, and have a notable lack of competition success compared to Sylva and Westfield. They are fine, robust roadgoing sports cars, but I wouldn't recommend one for competition use.

Wacky Racer

38,998 posts

254 months

Thursday 29th April 2004
quotequote all
Martin_S said:

Wacky Racer said:


Martin_S said:
I'm going to get a lot of stick for this, I know, but IMHO, you're better off sticking with only a handful of manufacturers if you want a competitive trackday/competition weapon as well as just a pleasant weekend toy.

Caterham and Westfield you have already identified. Sylva and Sylva derivatives are extremely competitive and very good value for money. Dax is well designed and fairly well developed, if a little on the big side.

All the rest are either second-rate in design terms, or too low-volume to have proven themselves one way or the other.






Errr, you forgot Tiger, , makers of the fastest accelerating sports car in the world!!! 0-60 in 2.8 seconds, with over fifteen years design development behind it......



No, I didn't forget them - I was merely trying to be polite by not naming specific manufacturers. The twin engined Z-cars Tiger is neither representative of the breed, or a well handling car, from what I've heard. Sure, it's fast in a straight line, but then so is anything weighing less than a ton if you bolt a couple of 150bhp bike engines into it and gear it low enough. Chris Allanson's background is grass-trackers, and it shows. His grasp of suspension and handling is rudimentary to say the least - anyone see his trailing arm BEC conversion of the Smart on display at this years Autosports show? And the Smart is a car that needs a computer to stop it falling over even with a properly designed suspension set-up...

'Normal' Tigers are rather heavily built, have design shortcomings which are glaringly obvious even from cursory inspection, and have a notable lack of competition success compared to Sylva and Westfield. They are fine, robust roadgoing sports cars, but I wouldn't recommend one for competition use.



Hmmm, I was only using the "Z" cars version as an extreme example, obviously this car is virtually a one off but shows what can be done, however I have owned and built both Westfields AND Tigers in the past and would say as regards handling there is very little to choose between them.

I concede that a Westfield will probably hold it's value a bit better than a Tiger...

Whilst Sylva have a very good reputation on the track granted, I personally feel their
looks let them down, but obviously this is only imho.

However, look before you leap as they say, and try as many makes as possible, before a final decision is arrived at......

feet

135 posts

247 months

Sunday 9th May 2004
quotequote all
I'd agree will all above, best to stick to the proven, larger volume manufacturers, like Sylva, Westfield, Tiger, Dax, Caterham, Stuart Taylor. Didn't notice F27 mentioned, though, and think they should be considered alongside these as a slightly cheaper option (don't go as cheap as the Robin Hood for competition though). Within this group it comes down to personal choice more than anything, but don't underestimate how useful it is to be living near to the location of the manufacturers - which is something which made the deciding difference when I chose my 7.

Mikey G

Original Poster:

4,784 posts

247 months

Monday 10th May 2004
quotequote all
Well, ive since discovered the MK Indy. saw the chassis at Stoneleigh and they had a BEC on there stand aswell, was very impressed with the chassis and had none of this fancy inboard stuff etc was a very good price too
Just need to change my road car for something a bit bigger to tow and cheaper to run

Locoblade

7,651 posts

263 months

Monday 10th May 2004
quotequote all
I don't agree with Martin's comment about there only being a select few manufacturers to choose from if you want a competetive track car, there's nothing wrong with a well set up Locost derivative (MK / Stuart Taylor etc) cos they are every bit as quick as an equivalent Westie / Sylva etc round a circuit. Admittedly you get what you pay for with regards to quality of GRP etc, but mechanically / dynamically they are hard to seperate.

Chris

>> Edited by Locoblade on Monday 10th May 18:54