Name change for Which Kit???

Name change for Which Kit???

Author
Discussion

Wacky Racer

Original Poster:

38,998 posts

254 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
So, from next month Which Kit? is going to be renamed Which Kit car?....

Is this a cynical ploy by Peter Filby, or just sound business sense??

meeja

8,290 posts

255 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
Haven't seen WK this month yet. (Purposefully didn't buy it at Stafford yesterday!)

Sounds to me like someone admitting (to themselves at least) defeat.

Make yourself similar to the competition, and hopefully grab a few floating readers whose mates have said "There's an article on XXXXXX in this month's Kit Car magazine....."

traction

366 posts

259 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
Seems its time for den to put a monicker/subtext under his mags title, suggestions?

How about, "The original and the best!"



Ta.

meeja

8,290 posts

255 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
traction said:
Seems its time for den to put a monicker/subtext under his mags title, suggestions?

How about, "The original and the best!"



Ta.



Or "Often Imitated, Never Bettered"

kitcarman

805 posts

255 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
Suppose that since I’ve nicked his technical contributor, he feels OK about nicking my name.

On top of the company name thing, I think it’s OOO.

Den

meeja

8,290 posts

255 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
kitcarman said:
Suppose that since I’ve nicked his technical contributor, he feels OK about nicking my name.

On top of the company name thing, I think it’s OOO.

Den


Nick his daughter, and all will be fair and square....

Stop that right now Meeja.....

Wacky Racer

Original Poster:

38,998 posts

254 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
meeja said:

kitcarman said:
Suppose that since I’ve nicked his technical contributor, he feels OK about nicking my name.

On top of the company name thing, I think it’s OOO.

Den



Nick his daughter, and all will be fair and square....

Stop that right now Meeja.....





He can't do that


Amy's old enough to be his grandaughter.......











and mine too..................

D-Angle

4,468 posts

249 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
I have to say, this does sound like it's getting very close to passing off...

I believe the law requires for it to be close enough to cause confusion in order for there to be a case. I think there is something about a deliberate intention to cause confusion as well but lets not go into that...

Reagrds,
Justin

meeja

8,290 posts

255 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
Wacky Racer said:

meeja said:


kitcarman said:
Suppose that since I’ve nicked his technical contributor, he feels OK about nicking my name.

On top of the company name thing, I think it’s OOO.

Den




Nick his daughter, and all will be fair and square....

Stop that right now Meeja.....






He can't do that


Amy's old enough to be his grandaughter.......











and mine too..................


Doesn't stop a guy dreaming.....

Ouch! Mrs Meeja has a rather useful left hook....

Ex-Biker

1,315 posts

254 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
traction said:
Seems its time for den to put a monicker/subtext under his mags title, suggestions?

How about, "The original and the best!"



Ta.



Kit Car - 'Written and Read by Real Enthusiast's'

kitcarman

805 posts

255 months

Monday 15th March 2004
quotequote all
KitCarMag said:
The original. . . Often Imitated. . . Never Bettered. . . The No1!

Hozzat for a sub-title?

toby tucker

648 posts

271 months

Tuesday 16th March 2004
quotequote all
Having had aspirations to build a 7 type kit car to track /sprint, I've finally bought a part built SPD7 that I'm truly delighted with it and the challenge to get it on the road.

However I've been following the slanging match in this forum about 'Which Kit' vs. 'Kit car' mags - and its getting boring. I'm not a regular subscriber to either mag - but you know what? I could'nt care a toss on what mag has the most pages - I buy (or not) based on checking out the articles first in W.S. Smith's mag stand - if i see an article that's interesting to ME then I probably buy the mag. I certainly don't base my purchase decision based on the number of pages or ads thats either mag has. IMHO both pubs have their merits which is to further the aim of the kit car world which surely both pubs can do without slagging each other off . R.I.P

>> Edited by toby tucker on Tuesday 16th March 20:16

anonymous-user

61 months

Tuesday 16th March 2004
quotequote all


Don't bite guys.

jgmadkit

548 posts

256 months

Tuesday 16th March 2004
quotequote all
Disregarding all thats gone before I actually think the name change to 'Which Kit Car' is a sensible one and I'm surprised they hadn't done it years ago.

I often wondered what people thought when they saw a mag entitled 'Which Kit' - it could mean anything, so a name change to 'Which Kit Car' makes sense to me as it makes it quite clear what the magazine is about.

They just need to get their act together now and provide constructive and impartial journalism as the title 'Which Kit Car' implies that it will come up with some sort of recommendation based on facts.

John - Madabout

kitcarman

805 posts

255 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
jgmadkit said:
I actually think the name change to 'Which Kit Car' is a sensible one and I'm surprised they hadn't done it years ago.

John - Madabout
They weren’t allowed to.

Den

Liszt

4,330 posts

277 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
So how can they do it now? Or are they still not allowed to?

meeja

8,290 posts

255 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
Liszt said:
So how can they do it now? Or are they still not allowed to?


I wondered that as well....

kitcarman

805 posts

255 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
Very briefly (and carefully, Ted ).
Fib’s was operating Kit Car magazine through an Ltd company in the early 1980’s. That company couldn’t pay its printer and was wound-up. Fib’s set about producing the next issue through another company.

Printer did two things. Firstly he acquired the rights to publish Kit Car from the company’s receiver (in exchange for the debt that was owed to the printer by the company). Secondly he applied to the High Court for an injunction to prevent Fib’s carrying on publishing Kit Car magazine.

The wording on the Court Order was to the effect that the words ‘Kit’ and ‘Car’ could not appear together on the cover of any magazine published by Fib’s.

That’s why Fib’s published ‘Component Car’ initially, then ‘Which Kit?’ latterly.

Den

meeja

8,290 posts

255 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
kitcarman said:

The wording on the Court Order was to the effect that the words ‘Kit’ and ‘Car’ could not appear together on the cover of any magazine published by Fib’s.


So why is this now being allowed? Or has the court order expired (or something like that)

kitcarman

805 posts

255 months

Wednesday 17th March 2004
quotequote all
meeja said:
So why is this now being allowed? Or has the court order expired . . . .
It expired a few years ago, at which time Which Kit? was clearly market leader.

Time to apply for a new Order, maybe?

Den