performance figures for the Rover 4.0 V8 Rush?

performance figures for the Rover 4.0 V8 Rush?

Author
Discussion

Andy Mac

Original Poster:

73,668 posts

262 months

Sunday 18th January 2004
quotequote all
As the question states... any idea, as I may be interested in purchasing one of these as a car for trackdays, and hoonig in wales!
Cheers
Andy

mattstead

369 posts

253 months

Sunday 18th January 2004
quotequote all
Not too sure, my 3.9 Seight did 0-60 in 4.5 sec and standing quarter in 13 sec, hope this helps.

Oh, and if you want to experience DAX around a track, then come to Kitcar Magazines sponsored trackday at Elvington airfield on Aprill 11th, Where Dax are bringing 2 cars.

v8 jago

982 posts

260 months

Tuesday 20th January 2004
quotequote all
Hmmmm. That is the same day as york raceways first meeting Why do these two venues always have events on the same days

enginearin

228 posts

259 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
If you want a dax for trackdays i'd go for the cossie version (of course i would i've got one )

The westfield s-eight's are quick in a straight line but round the bends they had no chance against my cossie rush.

I've driven a 3.9 v8 rush when i was buying mine, and although it feels quick, its far more sedate than the cossie.

I'm bringing the rush up to leeds in march, if you can wait that long i'll take you out in it and show you what i mean

Tim.

chris_n

1,232 posts

265 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
enginearin said:
The westfield s-eight's are quick in a straight line but round the bends they had no chance against my cossie rush.


Why is that so, when I've always read that the Rover engine is actually lighter than the pinto that forms the basis of a cossie lump? That should make a Rover engined car lighter/more agile in the bends, or am I missing something important???

Chris

anonymous-user

61 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
4WD?

enginearin

228 posts

259 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
On the basis of your weight info i'm not sure why we were so much quicker. maybe i'm just michael shumacher posting under another name

seriously though it was my first public trackday, and i was very surprised to find that the car was that much quicker than most other things there.

more surprising at the time was the fact that we (2up) were quicker than a couple of 2up megabusa's on the straights too, only when i sat down and did the power to weight calcs did it become less of a surprise

330bhp dax vs 180bhp busa loaded up with same weight in passengers = dax approx 50bhp/ton more than busa (from memory, i'm pretty sure i posted it up here somewhere at the time!!))

round the twisty curborough sprint course the dax was only about 1/2sec slower than a couple of busa's too.

Tha dax really loses out on fuel consumption though, i get about 6-8mpg on the track (i burnt 90 litres in a day at bruntingthorpe!!!)

basically having driven both cars, if you want a lazy power (read tons of low down torque) cruiser go for the standard 4.litre V8 if you want a particularly exhilerating (spelling???) track car go for a 330bhp cossie or a turbo-busa


edited to say mine's 2wd

>> Edited by enginearin on Wednesday 21st January 16:54

enginearin

228 posts

259 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
here's the post r.e. power to weight:

"the thing with the bike engined cars and big drivers is that the dry power to weight ratio of the cars is great, with people in it drops drastically.

e.g. busa = 180bhp and 450kg = 400bhp/ton
busa + me and passenger = 630kg = 285bhp/tom

dax = 300bhp and 650kg = 461bhp/ton
dax + me and passenger = 830kg = 361bhp/ton

in % loss

busa = -29% power to weight
dax = -22% power to weight

basically bike engined cars and big passenger loads don't work too well. "

anonymous-user

61 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
Still doesn't explain why it's quicker round corners though, does it?

Could it be that the Cossie being a smaller lump can be placed further back in the chassis offsetting the extra weight?

chris_n

1,232 posts

265 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
enginearin said:
basically bike engined cars and big passenger loads don't work too well. "


Either I'd better steer clear of bike engines or get down the gym!

Seriously though, your point is a good one, and a strong argument for thinking carefully before jumping on the BEC wagon.

Does your Rush have the camber compensating front suspension? I'd imagine that would have quite an impact. I'd love to see a back to back track test between two identical cars, same driver, except one with CC susp and one-without to really understand the difference it makes.

Chris

enginearin

228 posts

259 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
my rush doesn't have the cc suspension (its a bit too old for that unfortunately). i don't fancy getting it retro fitted either (loadsa cash!!), i've just bought some super sticky kumho tyres for the front of the rush which has made the world of difference to braking and lateral grip (back tyres goin on AFTER my driving tuition day in march!!).

Duncan Cowper has been using a cc suspension turbo busa in some sprint series (can't remember which one), anyway he blitzed everything he came up against including single seater pilbeams and the like. although a spectacular achievement i dont think that it can be attributed solely to the cc suspension (777bhp/ton might have a lot to do with it )

I too reckon that we need a back to back test to prove the benefits of cc. CCC magazine didn't like the feel of the road car with cc system fitted (said it had too much body roll, with wheels still upright) but they thought duncans race car was awesome.

The turbo busa is the best bike engine car available imho, full boost is available from 4000-10500rpm. With that amount of revs available its got to be nothing like driving a normal turbo car, my dax has full boost from about 3500 to 5500-6000.

I'd love to have a go in it

enginearin

228 posts

259 months

Wednesday 21st January 2004
quotequote all
lexsport,

it might be a combination of the engine being further back and my considerable bulk just in front of the back axle

still not sure though, i'm not that well up on chassis dynamics. i reckon that were gonna go even quicker round the bends with these new sticky tyres.

i can't wait to get out in it again.

pwig

11,956 posts

277 months

Saturday 24th January 2004
quotequote all
Book me in for a ride will ya

enginearin

228 posts

259 months

Monday 26th January 2004
quotequote all
looks like you've got andy_mac's place pwig , don't think he's been back since he started the thread.

pwig

11,956 posts

277 months

Monday 26th January 2004
quotequote all

chumley-warner

310 posts

264 months

Thursday 29th January 2004
quotequote all
enginearin said:
If you want a dax for trackdays i'd go for the cossie version (of course i would i've got one )

The westfield s-eight's are quick in a straight line but round the bends they had no chance against my cossie rush.

I've driven a 3.9 v8 rush when i was buying mine, and although it feels quick, its far more sedate than the cossie.

I'm bringing the rush up to leeds in march, if you can wait that long i'll take you out in it and show you what i mean

Tim.



Depends what the Seight has had done to it. Stock ones are considerably done on power to your Cossie, and since most get used as road cars, they are not usually set up for it, or wearing the right boots.

Holding onto a barrel of torque through a corner is easier than looking for the next gear IMO.