Can we flag the threads...

Can we flag the threads...

Author
Discussion

Incorrigible

Original Poster:

13,668 posts

268 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
....that Kitcarman has posted on ?

So that I don't have to read the same sh1t for the hundredth time

Or is it just me

gpdude

48 posts

253 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
Well I rather prefer 1000 posts from Den instead of your impolite attitude!

Incorrigible

Original Poster:

13,668 posts

268 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
OK,

But you've only been here a month, how many of my other posts have you found impolite and/or unhelpfull ??

>> I've heard all I'm going to hear (a lot) over the last few months, I've formed an opinion (which is still fairly open) based on what I've heard. But Unless I go and speak to Den personally I'm never even going to get his FULL side of the story, so the bickering seems pretty pointless to me and I don't have enough time to read a post, jump a post because I've heard it before etc

I read your last thread re your bussiness, I hope you sort it out (or have already) and I'm sorry that you found my post offensive. I still feel that way though

All the best

Ben

>> Edited by Incorrigible on Tuesday 11th November 16:23

Marki

15,763 posts

277 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
gpdude said:
Well I rather prefer 1000 posts from Den instead of your impolite attitude!



You can not have read many if you think that

Ferg

15,242 posts

264 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
Ben,
Can you have an 'open opinion' and be 'incorrigible' at the same time?

BTW I had a friend who bought a Chimera new a few years back and took it to the dealer for service prior to his wedding....phone rang, it was the dealer explaining that one of their mechanics had written it off on a test drive!!

Dealer's name withheld.

Incorrigible

Original Poster:

13,668 posts

268 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
As a diclaimer, I don't work for a dealer

Back on topic, do you think the WK KCI thing is going on a bit

tombs

135 posts

254 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
The last threads ends about PF and DT and you start another one!! HELLO!!

>> Edited by tombs on Tuesday 11th November 16:54

mattstead

369 posts

253 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
Just answer me this, why did you start this thread?

Honestly why? If you want to say something about Den then why not just join in the barage he is probably getting (and equally giving) on another thread. As tombs points out Den hasn't started many threads about the whole WK and KC mag thing (KCI is a different mag all together...but hey a kitcar fan such as yourself would know that). It's very true that Den often steps in with both feet first to put his view across , as it is one he is rightfully passionate about, but now a days he does only seem to do it to "defend" his honour when people such as your self try and get a rise out of him.

So back to the question, Why did you start this thread, if it wasn't just to play childish games, pick on others, and stir some shit?

Incorrigible

Original Poster:

13,668 posts

268 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
I started this thread because

1. I have nothing against Den, and don't want to say "give it rest mate" on every thread where he brings this up

2. As I said before I'm vaguely aware of the story, I've heard all I'm ever going to hear, so re-iteration every five fg minutes seems pretty pointless to me

3. I wanted to remind Den that a lot of people have already asked him to keep his comments positive as he has a lot of usefull knowledge about the kit car industry. At the moment when I see "kitcarman" in the reply cloumn I think "I hope he's not going on again" I am frequently disappointed

4. I did not start this thread to "just to play childish games, pick on others, and stir some shit" I really hope you're not a Troll 'cause if you are I've just fell for it, I will always give new members the benefit of the doubt though

5. I wondered if anyone else felt the same. It would seem not, but quite a few of the replies have come from new(ish) members who haven't had this day in day out for the last 4 months


I don't mind being the only one who thinks like this, but please refrain from the name calling all to prevalent, in the threads I'm moaning about

Incorrigible

Original Poster:

13,668 posts

268 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
mattstead said:
when people such as your self try and get a rise out of him.
No not at all, the last thing I want

And sorry about the KC / KCI thing, please excuse the odd typo

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

291 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
Incorrigible said:
5. I wondered if anyone else felt the same.

Largely yes. I read threads which have new posts, but it depends on who posted last... kitcarman is not one of those which attracts the fastest mouse click.

It's a bit like the drunk in the pub, always looking for one more person to listen to the story...

Wacky Racer

38,989 posts

254 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
Incorrigible said:
I started this thread because

1. I have nothing against Den, and don't want to say "give it rest mate" on every thread where he brings this up





A while ago, I bet Den a fiver he couldn't last a week without mentioning Fib's but he declined my bet.......






ps. I wouldn't have taken his money off him anyway

>> Edited by Wacky Racer on Tuesday 11th November 17:38

chris_n

1,232 posts

265 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
As far as I can see, absolutely no-one appears to be saying "this KC/WC saga is really interesting, tell me more". So if we all stop mentioning it, and Kitcarman has supposedly said he won't mention it except in response to others posts, then it should all go away.

So, anyone who mentions either mag from now on is therefore blatantly trolling and deserves to be treated accordingly, surely?

Got to be worth a try, hasn't it?

gpdude

48 posts

253 months

Tuesday 11th November 2003
quotequote all
Incorrigible said:
OK,

But you've only been here a month, how many of my other posts have you found impolite and/or unhelpfull ??


I must admid your other posts have not bothered me at all. Point taken.

Incorrigible said:
I read your last thread re your bussiness, I hope you sort it out (or have already) and I'm sorry that you found my post offensive.


Thank you!
Much appreciated! We're working on it...

Aprisa

1,829 posts

265 months

Wednesday 12th November 2003
quotequote all
Incorrigible
I was the person responsible for bringing the debate to PH in the first instance and long ago sttled my feelings on the subject with Den.

I have had little problem in avoiding the ongoing saga since then but starting a thread like this with no clue in the title will only serve to bring it to the fore again.

So this time I blame you
Nick

Incorrigible

Original Poster:

13,668 posts

268 months

Wednesday 12th November 2003
quotequote all
Aprisa said:
So this time I blame you [Nick
I just wanted Den to know that people were actively avoiding it as there are rarely clues in the other thread titles

Just goes to show that if you want to have a rant, do it in gen gassing where it'll be off the first page within 20 minutes

happier today, sorry I rubbed people up the wrong way etc etc etc